Sand Face

Humanism after Antihumanism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Have the critiques of humanism of the 1960s and 1970s buried this idea once and for all? Or is there a way that humanism can absorb some of this antihumanist thinking and thereby renew itself? Drawing on writings of Michel Foucault, Charles Taylor, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Martin Heidegger in order to illuminate artworks by Robert Smithson and Hans Holbein, René Arcilla argues for a revised idea of the human that is rooted not in some authentic, essential identity of ours, but in an unruly language in which we all participate. He suggests that educatively cultivating a society that appreciates the Human language could be the aim of humanism in our time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)655-664
Number of pages10
JournalEducational Theory
Volume65
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

humanism
language

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Sand Face : Humanism after Antihumanism. / Arcilla, René V.

In: Educational Theory, Vol. 65, No. 6, 01.12.2015, p. 655-664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{89ee483bf5eb446d9df97ac1e97bb222,
title = "Sand Face: Humanism after Antihumanism",
abstract = "Have the critiques of humanism of the 1960s and 1970s buried this idea once and for all? Or is there a way that humanism can absorb some of this antihumanist thinking and thereby renew itself? Drawing on writings of Michel Foucault, Charles Taylor, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Martin Heidegger in order to illuminate artworks by Robert Smithson and Hans Holbein, Ren{\'e} Arcilla argues for a revised idea of the human that is rooted not in some authentic, essential identity of ours, but in an unruly language in which we all participate. He suggests that educatively cultivating a society that appreciates the Human language could be the aim of humanism in our time.",
author = "Arcilla, {Ren{\'e} V.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/edth.12140",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "655--664",
journal = "Educational Theory",
issn = "0013-2004",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sand Face

T2 - Humanism after Antihumanism

AU - Arcilla, René V.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Have the critiques of humanism of the 1960s and 1970s buried this idea once and for all? Or is there a way that humanism can absorb some of this antihumanist thinking and thereby renew itself? Drawing on writings of Michel Foucault, Charles Taylor, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Martin Heidegger in order to illuminate artworks by Robert Smithson and Hans Holbein, René Arcilla argues for a revised idea of the human that is rooted not in some authentic, essential identity of ours, but in an unruly language in which we all participate. He suggests that educatively cultivating a society that appreciates the Human language could be the aim of humanism in our time.

AB - Have the critiques of humanism of the 1960s and 1970s buried this idea once and for all? Or is there a way that humanism can absorb some of this antihumanist thinking and thereby renew itself? Drawing on writings of Michel Foucault, Charles Taylor, Friedrich Nietzsche, and Martin Heidegger in order to illuminate artworks by Robert Smithson and Hans Holbein, René Arcilla argues for a revised idea of the human that is rooted not in some authentic, essential identity of ours, but in an unruly language in which we all participate. He suggests that educatively cultivating a society that appreciates the Human language could be the aim of humanism in our time.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84952323576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84952323576&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/edth.12140

DO - 10.1111/edth.12140

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 655

EP - 664

JO - Educational Theory

JF - Educational Theory

SN - 0013-2004

IS - 6

ER -