Sample Retention in an Urban Context

Exploring Influential Factors Within a Longitudinal Randomized Evaluation

Juliana Karras-Jean Gilles, Jennifer Astuto, Kalina Gjicali, LaRue Allen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Secondary data analysis was employed to scrutinize factors affecting sample retention in a randomized evaluation of an early childhood intervention. Retention was measured by whether data were collected at 3 points over 2 years. The participants were diverse, immigrant, and U.S.-born families of color from urban, low-income communities. We examined how the initial recruitment and enrollment process, and sample demographics related to retention. Effects that adversely related to retention included recruitment from a public area (e.g., bus stop) versus personally salient locations (e.g., child’s school); assignment to the control group versus the treatment group; longer time lapses in communication between researchers and participants; and living in a less-resourced, low-income neighborhood relative to higher resourced, low-income neighborhoods. Being born outside the United States was positively associated with retention relative to participants born in the U.S. Implications for evaluators and recommendations for evaluation methodology are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-290
Number of pages23
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

low income
evaluation
secondary analysis
Motor Vehicles
data analysis
Group
Color
childhood
Communication
immigrant
Research Personnel
Demography
Control Groups
communication
methodology
school
community
Evaluation
Influential factors
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • randomized evaluation
  • sample retention
  • sociocultural variability
  • urban context

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Sample Retention in an Urban Context : Exploring Influential Factors Within a Longitudinal Randomized Evaluation. / Karras-Jean Gilles, Juliana; Astuto, Jennifer; Gjicali, Kalina; Allen, LaRue.

In: American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.06.2019, p. 268-290.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karras-Jean Gilles, Juliana ; Astuto, Jennifer ; Gjicali, Kalina ; Allen, LaRue. / Sample Retention in an Urban Context : Exploring Influential Factors Within a Longitudinal Randomized Evaluation. In: American Journal of Evaluation. 2019 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 268-290.
@article{8cf532f71ef945b3bbe15556e2724955,
title = "Sample Retention in an Urban Context: Exploring Influential Factors Within a Longitudinal Randomized Evaluation",
abstract = "Secondary data analysis was employed to scrutinize factors affecting sample retention in a randomized evaluation of an early childhood intervention. Retention was measured by whether data were collected at 3 points over 2 years. The participants were diverse, immigrant, and U.S.-born families of color from urban, low-income communities. We examined how the initial recruitment and enrollment process, and sample demographics related to retention. Effects that adversely related to retention included recruitment from a public area (e.g., bus stop) versus personally salient locations (e.g., child’s school); assignment to the control group versus the treatment group; longer time lapses in communication between researchers and participants; and living in a less-resourced, low-income neighborhood relative to higher resourced, low-income neighborhoods. Being born outside the United States was positively associated with retention relative to participants born in the U.S. Implications for evaluators and recommendations for evaluation methodology are discussed.",
keywords = "randomized evaluation, sample retention, sociocultural variability, urban context",
author = "{Karras-Jean Gilles}, Juliana and Jennifer Astuto and Kalina Gjicali and LaRue Allen",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1098214017742719",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "268--290",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sample Retention in an Urban Context

T2 - Exploring Influential Factors Within a Longitudinal Randomized Evaluation

AU - Karras-Jean Gilles, Juliana

AU - Astuto, Jennifer

AU - Gjicali, Kalina

AU - Allen, LaRue

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Secondary data analysis was employed to scrutinize factors affecting sample retention in a randomized evaluation of an early childhood intervention. Retention was measured by whether data were collected at 3 points over 2 years. The participants were diverse, immigrant, and U.S.-born families of color from urban, low-income communities. We examined how the initial recruitment and enrollment process, and sample demographics related to retention. Effects that adversely related to retention included recruitment from a public area (e.g., bus stop) versus personally salient locations (e.g., child’s school); assignment to the control group versus the treatment group; longer time lapses in communication between researchers and participants; and living in a less-resourced, low-income neighborhood relative to higher resourced, low-income neighborhoods. Being born outside the United States was positively associated with retention relative to participants born in the U.S. Implications for evaluators and recommendations for evaluation methodology are discussed.

AB - Secondary data analysis was employed to scrutinize factors affecting sample retention in a randomized evaluation of an early childhood intervention. Retention was measured by whether data were collected at 3 points over 2 years. The participants were diverse, immigrant, and U.S.-born families of color from urban, low-income communities. We examined how the initial recruitment and enrollment process, and sample demographics related to retention. Effects that adversely related to retention included recruitment from a public area (e.g., bus stop) versus personally salient locations (e.g., child’s school); assignment to the control group versus the treatment group; longer time lapses in communication between researchers and participants; and living in a less-resourced, low-income neighborhood relative to higher resourced, low-income neighborhoods. Being born outside the United States was positively associated with retention relative to participants born in the U.S. Implications for evaluators and recommendations for evaluation methodology are discussed.

KW - randomized evaluation

KW - sample retention

KW - sociocultural variability

KW - urban context

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066412081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066412081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098214017742719

DO - 10.1177/1098214017742719

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 268

EP - 290

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 2

ER -