Safety in the home healthcare sector

Development of a new household safety checklist

Robyn Gershon, Maureen Dailey, Lori A. Magda, Halley E.M. Riley, Jay Conolly, Alexis Silver

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Objectives: Unsafe household conditions could adversely affect safety and quality in home health care. However, risk identification tools and procedures that can be readily implemented in this setting are lacking. To address this need, we developed and tested a new household safety checklist and accompanying training program. Methods: A 50-item, photo-illustrated, multi-hazard checklist was designed as a tool to enable home healthcare paraprofessionals (HHCPs) to conduct visual safety inspections in patients' homes. The checklist focused on hazards presenting the greatest threat to the safety of seniors. A convenience sample of 57 HHCPs was recruited to participate in a 1-hour training program, followed by pilot testing of the checklist in their patients' households. Checklist data from 116 patient homes were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative feedback on the inspection process was provided by HHCPs participating in a focus group. Results: Pretesting and posttesting determined that the training program was effective; participating HHCPs' ability to identify household hazards significantly improved after training (P < 0.001). Using the checklist, HHCPs were able to identify unsafe conditions, including fire safety deficiencies, fall hazards, unsanitary conditions, and problems with medication management. Home healthcare paraprofessionals reported that the checklist was easy to use and that inspections were well accepted by patients. Inspections took roughly 20 minutes to conduct. Conclusions: Home healthcare paraprofessionals can be effectively trained to identify commonplace household hazards. Using this checklist as a guide, visual household inspections were easily performed by trained HHCPS. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the reliability of the checklist and to determine if hazard identification leads to interventions that improve performance outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-59
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Patient Safety
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2012

Fingerprint

Health Care Sector
Checklist
Safety
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Aptitude
Home Care Services
Focus Groups

Keywords

  • Home health care
  • Household hazards
  • Patient safety
  • Safety checklist
  • Worker safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Safety in the home healthcare sector : Development of a new household safety checklist. / Gershon, Robyn; Dailey, Maureen; Magda, Lori A.; Riley, Halley E.M.; Conolly, Jay; Silver, Alexis.

In: Journal of Patient Safety, Vol. 8, No. 2, 01.06.2012, p. 51-59.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Gershon, Robyn ; Dailey, Maureen ; Magda, Lori A. ; Riley, Halley E.M. ; Conolly, Jay ; Silver, Alexis. / Safety in the home healthcare sector : Development of a new household safety checklist. In: Journal of Patient Safety. 2012 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 51-59.
@article{a6806066fc6a4a3e9b2dcb314e553adb,
title = "Safety in the home healthcare sector: Development of a new household safety checklist",
abstract = "Objectives: Unsafe household conditions could adversely affect safety and quality in home health care. However, risk identification tools and procedures that can be readily implemented in this setting are lacking. To address this need, we developed and tested a new household safety checklist and accompanying training program. Methods: A 50-item, photo-illustrated, multi-hazard checklist was designed as a tool to enable home healthcare paraprofessionals (HHCPs) to conduct visual safety inspections in patients' homes. The checklist focused on hazards presenting the greatest threat to the safety of seniors. A convenience sample of 57 HHCPs was recruited to participate in a 1-hour training program, followed by pilot testing of the checklist in their patients' households. Checklist data from 116 patient homes were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative feedback on the inspection process was provided by HHCPs participating in a focus group. Results: Pretesting and posttesting determined that the training program was effective; participating HHCPs' ability to identify household hazards significantly improved after training (P < 0.001). Using the checklist, HHCPs were able to identify unsafe conditions, including fire safety deficiencies, fall hazards, unsanitary conditions, and problems with medication management. Home healthcare paraprofessionals reported that the checklist was easy to use and that inspections were well accepted by patients. Inspections took roughly 20 minutes to conduct. Conclusions: Home healthcare paraprofessionals can be effectively trained to identify commonplace household hazards. Using this checklist as a guide, visual household inspections were easily performed by trained HHCPS. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the reliability of the checklist and to determine if hazard identification leads to interventions that improve performance outcomes.",
keywords = "Home health care, Household hazards, Patient safety, Safety checklist, Worker safety",
author = "Robyn Gershon and Maureen Dailey and Magda, {Lori A.} and Riley, {Halley E.M.} and Jay Conolly and Alexis Silver",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PTS.0b013e31824a4ad6",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "51--59",
journal = "Journal of Patient Safety",
issn = "1549-8417",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety in the home healthcare sector

T2 - Development of a new household safety checklist

AU - Gershon, Robyn

AU - Dailey, Maureen

AU - Magda, Lori A.

AU - Riley, Halley E.M.

AU - Conolly, Jay

AU - Silver, Alexis

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Objectives: Unsafe household conditions could adversely affect safety and quality in home health care. However, risk identification tools and procedures that can be readily implemented in this setting are lacking. To address this need, we developed and tested a new household safety checklist and accompanying training program. Methods: A 50-item, photo-illustrated, multi-hazard checklist was designed as a tool to enable home healthcare paraprofessionals (HHCPs) to conduct visual safety inspections in patients' homes. The checklist focused on hazards presenting the greatest threat to the safety of seniors. A convenience sample of 57 HHCPs was recruited to participate in a 1-hour training program, followed by pilot testing of the checklist in their patients' households. Checklist data from 116 patient homes were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative feedback on the inspection process was provided by HHCPs participating in a focus group. Results: Pretesting and posttesting determined that the training program was effective; participating HHCPs' ability to identify household hazards significantly improved after training (P < 0.001). Using the checklist, HHCPs were able to identify unsafe conditions, including fire safety deficiencies, fall hazards, unsanitary conditions, and problems with medication management. Home healthcare paraprofessionals reported that the checklist was easy to use and that inspections were well accepted by patients. Inspections took roughly 20 minutes to conduct. Conclusions: Home healthcare paraprofessionals can be effectively trained to identify commonplace household hazards. Using this checklist as a guide, visual household inspections were easily performed by trained HHCPS. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the reliability of the checklist and to determine if hazard identification leads to interventions that improve performance outcomes.

AB - Objectives: Unsafe household conditions could adversely affect safety and quality in home health care. However, risk identification tools and procedures that can be readily implemented in this setting are lacking. To address this need, we developed and tested a new household safety checklist and accompanying training program. Methods: A 50-item, photo-illustrated, multi-hazard checklist was designed as a tool to enable home healthcare paraprofessionals (HHCPs) to conduct visual safety inspections in patients' homes. The checklist focused on hazards presenting the greatest threat to the safety of seniors. A convenience sample of 57 HHCPs was recruited to participate in a 1-hour training program, followed by pilot testing of the checklist in their patients' households. Checklist data from 116 patient homes were summarized using descriptive statistics. Qualitative feedback on the inspection process was provided by HHCPs participating in a focus group. Results: Pretesting and posttesting determined that the training program was effective; participating HHCPs' ability to identify household hazards significantly improved after training (P < 0.001). Using the checklist, HHCPs were able to identify unsafe conditions, including fire safety deficiencies, fall hazards, unsanitary conditions, and problems with medication management. Home healthcare paraprofessionals reported that the checklist was easy to use and that inspections were well accepted by patients. Inspections took roughly 20 minutes to conduct. Conclusions: Home healthcare paraprofessionals can be effectively trained to identify commonplace household hazards. Using this checklist as a guide, visual household inspections were easily performed by trained HHCPS. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the reliability of the checklist and to determine if hazard identification leads to interventions that improve performance outcomes.

KW - Home health care

KW - Household hazards

KW - Patient safety

KW - Safety checklist

KW - Worker safety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861420715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861420715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31824a4ad6

DO - 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31824a4ad6

M3 - Review article

VL - 8

SP - 51

EP - 59

JO - Journal of Patient Safety

JF - Journal of Patient Safety

SN - 1549-8417

IS - 2

ER -