Ruminations on challenges to prediction with rational choice models

Bruce Bueno De Mesquita

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The ultimate test of any social science theory lies in its ability to predict and explain real behavior. Converting formal theory into a form that can be tested against real-time predictions, however, is a difficult and demanding task. The growing literature on applied formal models provides an opportunity to investigate how robust predictions are to the relaxation of specific assumptions. Here I investigate the robustness of applied theories in the light of multiple equilibria and the chaos theorems of McKelvey and Schofield, alternative dimensionality assumptions, modifications of conditions for preference aggregation, and bounded rationality - all with an eye toward their implications for the accuracy of predictions regarding outcomes and decision dynamics. We come to a better understanding of the challenges that remain in converting formal models into practical tools to guide the assessment and making of complex decisions.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)136-147
    Number of pages12
    JournalRationality and Society
    Volume15
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Feb 2003

    Fingerprint

    social science theory
    chaos
    aggregation
    rationality
    ability
    time
    literature

    Keywords

    • Applied models
    • Bounded rationality
    • Common conjectures
    • Common knowledge
    • Game theory
    • Multiple equilibria
    • Prediction
    • Preference aggregation
    • Social choice theory
    • Spatial models

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Ruminations on challenges to prediction with rational choice models. / Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce.

    In: Rationality and Society, Vol. 15, No. 1, 02.2003, p. 136-147.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce. / Ruminations on challenges to prediction with rational choice models. In: Rationality and Society. 2003 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 136-147.
    @article{92fbd6b4b6134646abff04b6c57fe3ed,
    title = "Ruminations on challenges to prediction with rational choice models",
    abstract = "The ultimate test of any social science theory lies in its ability to predict and explain real behavior. Converting formal theory into a form that can be tested against real-time predictions, however, is a difficult and demanding task. The growing literature on applied formal models provides an opportunity to investigate how robust predictions are to the relaxation of specific assumptions. Here I investigate the robustness of applied theories in the light of multiple equilibria and the chaos theorems of McKelvey and Schofield, alternative dimensionality assumptions, modifications of conditions for preference aggregation, and bounded rationality - all with an eye toward their implications for the accuracy of predictions regarding outcomes and decision dynamics. We come to a better understanding of the challenges that remain in converting formal models into practical tools to guide the assessment and making of complex decisions.",
    keywords = "Applied models, Bounded rationality, Common conjectures, Common knowledge, Game theory, Multiple equilibria, Prediction, Preference aggregation, Social choice theory, Spatial models",
    author = "{Bueno De Mesquita}, Bruce",
    year = "2003",
    month = "2",
    doi = "10.1177/1043463103015001076",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "15",
    pages = "136--147",
    journal = "Rationality and Society",
    issn = "1043-4631",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ruminations on challenges to prediction with rational choice models

    AU - Bueno De Mesquita, Bruce

    PY - 2003/2

    Y1 - 2003/2

    N2 - The ultimate test of any social science theory lies in its ability to predict and explain real behavior. Converting formal theory into a form that can be tested against real-time predictions, however, is a difficult and demanding task. The growing literature on applied formal models provides an opportunity to investigate how robust predictions are to the relaxation of specific assumptions. Here I investigate the robustness of applied theories in the light of multiple equilibria and the chaos theorems of McKelvey and Schofield, alternative dimensionality assumptions, modifications of conditions for preference aggregation, and bounded rationality - all with an eye toward their implications for the accuracy of predictions regarding outcomes and decision dynamics. We come to a better understanding of the challenges that remain in converting formal models into practical tools to guide the assessment and making of complex decisions.

    AB - The ultimate test of any social science theory lies in its ability to predict and explain real behavior. Converting formal theory into a form that can be tested against real-time predictions, however, is a difficult and demanding task. The growing literature on applied formal models provides an opportunity to investigate how robust predictions are to the relaxation of specific assumptions. Here I investigate the robustness of applied theories in the light of multiple equilibria and the chaos theorems of McKelvey and Schofield, alternative dimensionality assumptions, modifications of conditions for preference aggregation, and bounded rationality - all with an eye toward their implications for the accuracy of predictions regarding outcomes and decision dynamics. We come to a better understanding of the challenges that remain in converting formal models into practical tools to guide the assessment and making of complex decisions.

    KW - Applied models

    KW - Bounded rationality

    KW - Common conjectures

    KW - Common knowledge

    KW - Game theory

    KW - Multiple equilibria

    KW - Prediction

    KW - Preference aggregation

    KW - Social choice theory

    KW - Spatial models

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037282054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037282054&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/1043463103015001076

    DO - 10.1177/1043463103015001076

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:0037282054

    VL - 15

    SP - 136

    EP - 147

    JO - Rationality and Society

    JF - Rationality and Society

    SN - 1043-4631

    IS - 1

    ER -