Rulership and Sovereignty at Akchakhan-kala in Chorasmia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Starting from the fall of the Seleucid Empire, scholars have noted changes to the practice of kingship manifest in the emergence of what has been described as a ruler cult based on a blending of Iranian and Greek or Hellenistic practices. The mix of indigenous Iranian ideas of kingship and (“Zoroastrian”) religion with Greek and Hellenistic ideas is key to understanding the practice of Central Asian rulership after the arrival of Alexander the Great. Chorasmia has not traditionally been part of this conversation: here the issue of a post-Seleucid transformation of Iranian kingship is nuanced by the fact that Alexander never visited the region, and the remains of Hellenism are rather scant. Nevertheless, the most recent findings at the mid 1st century BC - mid 1st century AD Ceremonial Complex at Akchakhan-kala suggest new practices of rule also in this region. This paper examines these new ideas against the background of changing practices in kingship across eastern Iran, the Caucasus and Central Asia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-278
Number of pages28
JournalAncient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia
Volume24
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

sovereignty
Central Asia
ritual
Iran
conversation
Religion
Rulership
Sovereignty
Kingship
Seleucids
Hellenistic Period

Keywords

  • Architecture
  • Chorasmia
  • Kingship
  • Sovereignty

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Classics
  • Archaeology
  • History
  • Archaeology

Cite this

Rulership and Sovereignty at Akchakhan-kala in Chorasmia. / Kidd, Fiona.

In: Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia, Vol. 24, No. 1-2, 01.01.2018, p. 251-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6b058bb817f2435faf08a18204c62f92,
title = "Rulership and Sovereignty at Akchakhan-kala in Chorasmia",
abstract = "Starting from the fall of the Seleucid Empire, scholars have noted changes to the practice of kingship manifest in the emergence of what has been described as a ruler cult based on a blending of Iranian and Greek or Hellenistic practices. The mix of indigenous Iranian ideas of kingship and (“Zoroastrian”) religion with Greek and Hellenistic ideas is key to understanding the practice of Central Asian rulership after the arrival of Alexander the Great. Chorasmia has not traditionally been part of this conversation: here the issue of a post-Seleucid transformation of Iranian kingship is nuanced by the fact that Alexander never visited the region, and the remains of Hellenism are rather scant. Nevertheless, the most recent findings at the mid 1st century BC - mid 1st century AD Ceremonial Complex at Akchakhan-kala suggest new practices of rule also in this region. This paper examines these new ideas against the background of changing practices in kingship across eastern Iran, the Caucasus and Central Asia.",
keywords = "Architecture, Chorasmia, Kingship, Sovereignty",
author = "Fiona Kidd",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1163/15700577-12341332",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "251--278",
journal = "Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia",
issn = "0929-077X",
publisher = "Brill",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rulership and Sovereignty at Akchakhan-kala in Chorasmia

AU - Kidd, Fiona

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Starting from the fall of the Seleucid Empire, scholars have noted changes to the practice of kingship manifest in the emergence of what has been described as a ruler cult based on a blending of Iranian and Greek or Hellenistic practices. The mix of indigenous Iranian ideas of kingship and (“Zoroastrian”) religion with Greek and Hellenistic ideas is key to understanding the practice of Central Asian rulership after the arrival of Alexander the Great. Chorasmia has not traditionally been part of this conversation: here the issue of a post-Seleucid transformation of Iranian kingship is nuanced by the fact that Alexander never visited the region, and the remains of Hellenism are rather scant. Nevertheless, the most recent findings at the mid 1st century BC - mid 1st century AD Ceremonial Complex at Akchakhan-kala suggest new practices of rule also in this region. This paper examines these new ideas against the background of changing practices in kingship across eastern Iran, the Caucasus and Central Asia.

AB - Starting from the fall of the Seleucid Empire, scholars have noted changes to the practice of kingship manifest in the emergence of what has been described as a ruler cult based on a blending of Iranian and Greek or Hellenistic practices. The mix of indigenous Iranian ideas of kingship and (“Zoroastrian”) religion with Greek and Hellenistic ideas is key to understanding the practice of Central Asian rulership after the arrival of Alexander the Great. Chorasmia has not traditionally been part of this conversation: here the issue of a post-Seleucid transformation of Iranian kingship is nuanced by the fact that Alexander never visited the region, and the remains of Hellenism are rather scant. Nevertheless, the most recent findings at the mid 1st century BC - mid 1st century AD Ceremonial Complex at Akchakhan-kala suggest new practices of rule also in this region. This paper examines these new ideas against the background of changing practices in kingship across eastern Iran, the Caucasus and Central Asia.

KW - Architecture

KW - Chorasmia

KW - Kingship

KW - Sovereignty

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065829482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065829482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/15700577-12341332

DO - 10.1163/15700577-12341332

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065829482

VL - 24

SP - 251

EP - 278

JO - Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia

JF - Ancient Civilizations from Scythia to Siberia

SN - 0929-077X

IS - 1-2

ER -