Risk bureaucracies in environmental health and safety management

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The management of health risks from environmental factors continues to be at the forefront of environmental policy and management in many areas, including energy production. In the 1990s, institutions to manage environmental health have continued to be created and refined and new bureaucracies and a professional workforce to deal with these problems have continued to be formed as well. This paper reviews the following aspects of environmental health risk management in the executive branch of the federal government, including those agencies responsible for energy risk management: (1) The nature and size of agency missions in environmental health; (2) the organization of risk functions; (3) the size and composition of agency workforces; and (4) the use of external resources to expand traditional human resources. Major findings are that environmental health has been given a high priority in the federal system in both agency missions and in the organization of the risk management function. The environmental health component of the workforce in many agencies having environmental health responsibilities is still relatively small compared to the representation of the conventional engineering disciplines. The environmental health profession is highly diverse, drawing from many disciplines, and as such, can diversify the existing workforce engaged in risk management. The size and composition of the environmental health workforce in federal agencies (including those devoted to energy production) necessitate reliance upon external resources and cross-agency linkages to supplement existing agency resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-114
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Energy Engineering
Volume117
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1991

Fingerprint

bureaucracy
health and safety
Health
Risk management
Health risks
health risk
resource
federal system
environmental health
Chemical analysis
human resource
environmental risk
environmental policy
environmental management
Personnel
environmental factor
engineering
risk management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Nuclear Energy and Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology
  • Waste Management and Disposal

Cite this

Risk bureaucracies in environmental health and safety management. / Zimmerman, Rae.

In: Journal of Energy Engineering, Vol. 117, No. 3, 1991, p. 97-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2ded385d0d5c487fa93a1c78ace6f7e0,
title = "Risk bureaucracies in environmental health and safety management",
abstract = "The management of health risks from environmental factors continues to be at the forefront of environmental policy and management in many areas, including energy production. In the 1990s, institutions to manage environmental health have continued to be created and refined and new bureaucracies and a professional workforce to deal with these problems have continued to be formed as well. This paper reviews the following aspects of environmental health risk management in the executive branch of the federal government, including those agencies responsible for energy risk management: (1) The nature and size of agency missions in environmental health; (2) the organization of risk functions; (3) the size and composition of agency workforces; and (4) the use of external resources to expand traditional human resources. Major findings are that environmental health has been given a high priority in the federal system in both agency missions and in the organization of the risk management function. The environmental health component of the workforce in many agencies having environmental health responsibilities is still relatively small compared to the representation of the conventional engineering disciplines. The environmental health profession is highly diverse, drawing from many disciplines, and as such, can diversify the existing workforce engaged in risk management. The size and composition of the environmental health workforce in federal agencies (including those devoted to energy production) necessitate reliance upon external resources and cross-agency linkages to supplement existing agency resources.",
author = "Rae Zimmerman",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1991)117:3(97)",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "97--114",
journal = "Journal of Energy Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "0733-9402",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk bureaucracies in environmental health and safety management

AU - Zimmerman, Rae

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - The management of health risks from environmental factors continues to be at the forefront of environmental policy and management in many areas, including energy production. In the 1990s, institutions to manage environmental health have continued to be created and refined and new bureaucracies and a professional workforce to deal with these problems have continued to be formed as well. This paper reviews the following aspects of environmental health risk management in the executive branch of the federal government, including those agencies responsible for energy risk management: (1) The nature and size of agency missions in environmental health; (2) the organization of risk functions; (3) the size and composition of agency workforces; and (4) the use of external resources to expand traditional human resources. Major findings are that environmental health has been given a high priority in the federal system in both agency missions and in the organization of the risk management function. The environmental health component of the workforce in many agencies having environmental health responsibilities is still relatively small compared to the representation of the conventional engineering disciplines. The environmental health profession is highly diverse, drawing from many disciplines, and as such, can diversify the existing workforce engaged in risk management. The size and composition of the environmental health workforce in federal agencies (including those devoted to energy production) necessitate reliance upon external resources and cross-agency linkages to supplement existing agency resources.

AB - The management of health risks from environmental factors continues to be at the forefront of environmental policy and management in many areas, including energy production. In the 1990s, institutions to manage environmental health have continued to be created and refined and new bureaucracies and a professional workforce to deal with these problems have continued to be formed as well. This paper reviews the following aspects of environmental health risk management in the executive branch of the federal government, including those agencies responsible for energy risk management: (1) The nature and size of agency missions in environmental health; (2) the organization of risk functions; (3) the size and composition of agency workforces; and (4) the use of external resources to expand traditional human resources. Major findings are that environmental health has been given a high priority in the federal system in both agency missions and in the organization of the risk management function. The environmental health component of the workforce in many agencies having environmental health responsibilities is still relatively small compared to the representation of the conventional engineering disciplines. The environmental health profession is highly diverse, drawing from many disciplines, and as such, can diversify the existing workforce engaged in risk management. The size and composition of the environmental health workforce in federal agencies (including those devoted to energy production) necessitate reliance upon external resources and cross-agency linkages to supplement existing agency resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026392208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026392208&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1991)117:3(97)

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9402(1991)117:3(97)

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0026392208

VL - 117

SP - 97

EP - 114

JO - Journal of Energy Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Energy Engineering - ASCE

SN - 0733-9402

IS - 3

ER -