Rhetorics of Radicalism

Daniel Karell, Michael Freedman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    What rhetorics run throughout radical discourse, and why do some gain prominence over others? The scholarship on radicalism largely portrays radical discourse as opposition to powerful ideas and enemies, but radicals often evince great interest in personal and local concerns. To shed light on how radicals use and adopt rhetoric, we analyze an original corpus of more than 23,000 pages produced by Afghan radical groups between 1979 and 2001 using a novel computational abductive approach. We first identify how radicalism not only attacks dominant ideas, actors, and institutions using a rhetoric of subversion, but also how it can use a rhetoric of reversion to urge intimate transformations in morals and behavior. Next, we find evidence that radicals’ networks of support affect the rhetorical mixture they espouse, due to social ties drawing radicals into encounters with backers’ social domains. Our study advances a relational understanding of radical discourse, while also showing how a combination of computational and abductive methods can help theorize and analyze discourses of contention.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)726-753
    Number of pages28
    JournalAmerican Sociological Review
    Volume84
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    radicalism
    rhetoric
    discourse
    subversion
    opposition
    evidence
    Group

    Keywords

    • Afghanistan
    • computational abductive analysis
    • radicalism
    • sociology of the future
    • textual analysis

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Rhetorics of Radicalism. / Karell, Daniel; Freedman, Michael.

    In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, 01.08.2019, p. 726-753.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Karell, D & Freedman, M 2019, 'Rhetorics of Radicalism', American Sociological Review, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 726-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419859519
    Karell, Daniel ; Freedman, Michael. / Rhetorics of Radicalism. In: American Sociological Review. 2019 ; Vol. 84, No. 4. pp. 726-753.
    @article{685ab5cadf9e4f0ba44143124f5e83f5,
    title = "Rhetorics of Radicalism",
    abstract = "What rhetorics run throughout radical discourse, and why do some gain prominence over others? The scholarship on radicalism largely portrays radical discourse as opposition to powerful ideas and enemies, but radicals often evince great interest in personal and local concerns. To shed light on how radicals use and adopt rhetoric, we analyze an original corpus of more than 23,000 pages produced by Afghan radical groups between 1979 and 2001 using a novel computational abductive approach. We first identify how radicalism not only attacks dominant ideas, actors, and institutions using a rhetoric of subversion, but also how it can use a rhetoric of reversion to urge intimate transformations in morals and behavior. Next, we find evidence that radicals’ networks of support affect the rhetorical mixture they espouse, due to social ties drawing radicals into encounters with backers’ social domains. Our study advances a relational understanding of radical discourse, while also showing how a combination of computational and abductive methods can help theorize and analyze discourses of contention.",
    keywords = "Afghanistan, computational abductive analysis, radicalism, sociology of the future, textual analysis",
    author = "Daniel Karell and Michael Freedman",
    year = "2019",
    month = "8",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1177/0003122419859519",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "84",
    pages = "726--753",
    journal = "American Sociological Review",
    issn = "0003-1224",
    publisher = "American Sociological Association",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Rhetorics of Radicalism

    AU - Karell, Daniel

    AU - Freedman, Michael

    PY - 2019/8/1

    Y1 - 2019/8/1

    N2 - What rhetorics run throughout radical discourse, and why do some gain prominence over others? The scholarship on radicalism largely portrays radical discourse as opposition to powerful ideas and enemies, but radicals often evince great interest in personal and local concerns. To shed light on how radicals use and adopt rhetoric, we analyze an original corpus of more than 23,000 pages produced by Afghan radical groups between 1979 and 2001 using a novel computational abductive approach. We first identify how radicalism not only attacks dominant ideas, actors, and institutions using a rhetoric of subversion, but also how it can use a rhetoric of reversion to urge intimate transformations in morals and behavior. Next, we find evidence that radicals’ networks of support affect the rhetorical mixture they espouse, due to social ties drawing radicals into encounters with backers’ social domains. Our study advances a relational understanding of radical discourse, while also showing how a combination of computational and abductive methods can help theorize and analyze discourses of contention.

    AB - What rhetorics run throughout radical discourse, and why do some gain prominence over others? The scholarship on radicalism largely portrays radical discourse as opposition to powerful ideas and enemies, but radicals often evince great interest in personal and local concerns. To shed light on how radicals use and adopt rhetoric, we analyze an original corpus of more than 23,000 pages produced by Afghan radical groups between 1979 and 2001 using a novel computational abductive approach. We first identify how radicalism not only attacks dominant ideas, actors, and institutions using a rhetoric of subversion, but also how it can use a rhetoric of reversion to urge intimate transformations in morals and behavior. Next, we find evidence that radicals’ networks of support affect the rhetorical mixture they espouse, due to social ties drawing radicals into encounters with backers’ social domains. Our study advances a relational understanding of radical discourse, while also showing how a combination of computational and abductive methods can help theorize and analyze discourses of contention.

    KW - Afghanistan

    KW - computational abductive analysis

    KW - radicalism

    KW - sociology of the future

    KW - textual analysis

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068855182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068855182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0003122419859519

    DO - 10.1177/0003122419859519

    M3 - Article

    VL - 84

    SP - 726

    EP - 753

    JO - American Sociological Review

    JF - American Sociological Review

    SN - 0003-1224

    IS - 4

    ER -