Rhetorics of Radicalism

Daniel Karell, Michael Freedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

What rhetorics run throughout radical discourse, and why do some gain prominence over others? The scholarship on radicalism largely portrays radical discourse as opposition to powerful ideas and enemies, but radicals often evince great interest in personal and local concerns. To shed light on how radicals use and adopt rhetoric, we analyze an original corpus of more than 23,000 pages produced by Afghan radical groups between 1979 and 2001 using a novel computational abductive approach. We first identify how radicalism not only attacks dominant ideas, actors, and institutions using a rhetoric of subversion, but also how it can use a rhetoric of reversion to urge intimate transformations in morals and behavior. Next, we find evidence that radicals’ networks of support affect the rhetorical mixture they espouse, due to social ties drawing radicals into encounters with backers’ social domains. Our study advances a relational understanding of radical discourse, while also showing how a combination of computational and abductive methods can help theorize and analyze discourses of contention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)726-753
Number of pages28
JournalAmerican Sociological Review
Volume84
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

radicalism
rhetoric
discourse
subversion
opposition
evidence
Group

Keywords

  • Afghanistan
  • computational abductive analysis
  • radicalism
  • sociology of the future
  • textual analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Rhetorics of Radicalism. / Karell, Daniel; Freedman, Michael.

In: American Sociological Review, Vol. 84, No. 4, 01.08.2019, p. 726-753.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karell, Daniel ; Freedman, Michael. / Rhetorics of Radicalism. In: American Sociological Review. 2019 ; Vol. 84, No. 4. pp. 726-753.
@article{d1e6ceb303a8461ab21427e8ad4e859f,
title = "Rhetorics of Radicalism",
abstract = "What rhetorics run throughout radical discourse, and why do some gain prominence over others? The scholarship on radicalism largely portrays radical discourse as opposition to powerful ideas and enemies, but radicals often evince great interest in personal and local concerns. To shed light on how radicals use and adopt rhetoric, we analyze an original corpus of more than 23,000 pages produced by Afghan radical groups between 1979 and 2001 using a novel computational abductive approach. We first identify how radicalism not only attacks dominant ideas, actors, and institutions using a rhetoric of subversion, but also how it can use a rhetoric of reversion to urge intimate transformations in morals and behavior. Next, we find evidence that radicals’ networks of support affect the rhetorical mixture they espouse, due to social ties drawing radicals into encounters with backers’ social domains. Our study advances a relational understanding of radical discourse, while also showing how a combination of computational and abductive methods can help theorize and analyze discourses of contention.",
keywords = "Afghanistan, computational abductive analysis, radicalism, sociology of the future, textual analysis",
author = "Daniel Karell and Michael Freedman",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0003122419859519",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "726--753",
journal = "American Sociological Review",
issn = "0003-1224",
publisher = "American Sociological Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rhetorics of Radicalism

AU - Karell, Daniel

AU - Freedman, Michael

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - What rhetorics run throughout radical discourse, and why do some gain prominence over others? The scholarship on radicalism largely portrays radical discourse as opposition to powerful ideas and enemies, but radicals often evince great interest in personal and local concerns. To shed light on how radicals use and adopt rhetoric, we analyze an original corpus of more than 23,000 pages produced by Afghan radical groups between 1979 and 2001 using a novel computational abductive approach. We first identify how radicalism not only attacks dominant ideas, actors, and institutions using a rhetoric of subversion, but also how it can use a rhetoric of reversion to urge intimate transformations in morals and behavior. Next, we find evidence that radicals’ networks of support affect the rhetorical mixture they espouse, due to social ties drawing radicals into encounters with backers’ social domains. Our study advances a relational understanding of radical discourse, while also showing how a combination of computational and abductive methods can help theorize and analyze discourses of contention.

AB - What rhetorics run throughout radical discourse, and why do some gain prominence over others? The scholarship on radicalism largely portrays radical discourse as opposition to powerful ideas and enemies, but radicals often evince great interest in personal and local concerns. To shed light on how radicals use and adopt rhetoric, we analyze an original corpus of more than 23,000 pages produced by Afghan radical groups between 1979 and 2001 using a novel computational abductive approach. We first identify how radicalism not only attacks dominant ideas, actors, and institutions using a rhetoric of subversion, but also how it can use a rhetoric of reversion to urge intimate transformations in morals and behavior. Next, we find evidence that radicals’ networks of support affect the rhetorical mixture they espouse, due to social ties drawing radicals into encounters with backers’ social domains. Our study advances a relational understanding of radical discourse, while also showing how a combination of computational and abductive methods can help theorize and analyze discourses of contention.

KW - Afghanistan

KW - computational abductive analysis

KW - radicalism

KW - sociology of the future

KW - textual analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068855182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068855182&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0003122419859519

DO - 10.1177/0003122419859519

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85068855182

VL - 84

SP - 726

EP - 753

JO - American Sociological Review

JF - American Sociological Review

SN - 0003-1224

IS - 4

ER -