Revisiting the evolution of mouse LINE-1 in the genomic era

Akash Sookdeo, Crystal M. Hepp, Marcella A. McClure, Stephane Boissinot

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: LINE-1 (L1) is the dominant category of transposable elements in placental mammals. L1 has significantly affected the size and structure of all mammalian genomes and understanding the nature of the interactions between L1 and its mammalian host remains a question of crucial importance in comparative genomics. For this reason, much attention has been dedicated to the evolution of L1. Among the most studied elements is the mouse L1 which has been the subject of a number of studies in the 1980s and 1990s. These seminal studies, performed in the pre-genomic era when only a limited number of L1 sequences were available, have significantly improved our understanding of L1 evolution. Yet, no comprehensive study on the evolution of L1 in mouse has been performed since the completion of this genome sequence. Results: Using the Genome Parsing Suite we performed the first evolutionary analysis of mouse L1 over the entire length of the element. This analysis indicates that the mouse L1 has recruited novel 5UTR sequences more frequently than previously thought and that the simultaneous activity of non-homologous promoters seems to be one of the conditions for the co-existence of multiple L1 families or lineages. In addition the exchange of genetic information between L1 families is not limited to the 5UTR as evidence of inter-family recombination was observed in ORF1, ORF2, and the 3UTR. In contrast to the human L1, there was little evidence of rapid amino-acid replacement in the coiled-coil of ORF1, although this region is structurally unstable. We propose that the structural instability of the coiled-coil domain might be adaptive and that structural changes in this region are selectively equivalent to the rapid evolution at the amino-acid level reported in the human lineage. Conclusions: The pattern of evolution of L1 in mouse shows some similarity with human suggesting that the nature of the interactions between L1 and its host might be similar in these two species. Yet, some notable differences, particularly in the evolution of ORF1, suggest that the molecular mechanisms involved in host-L1 interactions might be different in these two species.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number3
JournalMobile DNA
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 27 2013

Fingerprint

Genome
Amino Acids
DNA Transposable Elements
Genomics
Genetic Recombination
Mammals

Keywords

  • L1
  • LINE-1
  • Mus musculus
  • Recombination
  • Retroposon
  • Retrotransposon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Biology

Cite this

Revisiting the evolution of mouse LINE-1 in the genomic era. / Sookdeo, Akash; Hepp, Crystal M.; McClure, Marcella A.; Boissinot, Stephane.

In: Mobile DNA, Vol. 4, No. 1, 3, 27.03.2013.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sookdeo, Akash ; Hepp, Crystal M. ; McClure, Marcella A. ; Boissinot, Stephane. / Revisiting the evolution of mouse LINE-1 in the genomic era. In: Mobile DNA. 2013 ; Vol. 4, No. 1.
@article{11ee7a35d95448208dff8275119883c8,
title = "Revisiting the evolution of mouse LINE-1 in the genomic era",
abstract = "Background: LINE-1 (L1) is the dominant category of transposable elements in placental mammals. L1 has significantly affected the size and structure of all mammalian genomes and understanding the nature of the interactions between L1 and its mammalian host remains a question of crucial importance in comparative genomics. For this reason, much attention has been dedicated to the evolution of L1. Among the most studied elements is the mouse L1 which has been the subject of a number of studies in the 1980s and 1990s. These seminal studies, performed in the pre-genomic era when only a limited number of L1 sequences were available, have significantly improved our understanding of L1 evolution. Yet, no comprehensive study on the evolution of L1 in mouse has been performed since the completion of this genome sequence. Results: Using the Genome Parsing Suite we performed the first evolutionary analysis of mouse L1 over the entire length of the element. This analysis indicates that the mouse L1 has recruited novel 5UTR sequences more frequently than previously thought and that the simultaneous activity of non-homologous promoters seems to be one of the conditions for the co-existence of multiple L1 families or lineages. In addition the exchange of genetic information between L1 families is not limited to the 5UTR as evidence of inter-family recombination was observed in ORF1, ORF2, and the 3UTR. In contrast to the human L1, there was little evidence of rapid amino-acid replacement in the coiled-coil of ORF1, although this region is structurally unstable. We propose that the structural instability of the coiled-coil domain might be adaptive and that structural changes in this region are selectively equivalent to the rapid evolution at the amino-acid level reported in the human lineage. Conclusions: The pattern of evolution of L1 in mouse shows some similarity with human suggesting that the nature of the interactions between L1 and its host might be similar in these two species. Yet, some notable differences, particularly in the evolution of ORF1, suggest that the molecular mechanisms involved in host-L1 interactions might be different in these two species.",
keywords = "L1, LINE-1, Mus musculus, Recombination, Retroposon, Retrotransposon",
author = "Akash Sookdeo and Hepp, {Crystal M.} and McClure, {Marcella A.} and Stephane Boissinot",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "27",
doi = "10.1186/1759-8753-4-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
journal = "Mobile DNA",
issn = "1759-8753",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting the evolution of mouse LINE-1 in the genomic era

AU - Sookdeo, Akash

AU - Hepp, Crystal M.

AU - McClure, Marcella A.

AU - Boissinot, Stephane

PY - 2013/3/27

Y1 - 2013/3/27

N2 - Background: LINE-1 (L1) is the dominant category of transposable elements in placental mammals. L1 has significantly affected the size and structure of all mammalian genomes and understanding the nature of the interactions between L1 and its mammalian host remains a question of crucial importance in comparative genomics. For this reason, much attention has been dedicated to the evolution of L1. Among the most studied elements is the mouse L1 which has been the subject of a number of studies in the 1980s and 1990s. These seminal studies, performed in the pre-genomic era when only a limited number of L1 sequences were available, have significantly improved our understanding of L1 evolution. Yet, no comprehensive study on the evolution of L1 in mouse has been performed since the completion of this genome sequence. Results: Using the Genome Parsing Suite we performed the first evolutionary analysis of mouse L1 over the entire length of the element. This analysis indicates that the mouse L1 has recruited novel 5UTR sequences more frequently than previously thought and that the simultaneous activity of non-homologous promoters seems to be one of the conditions for the co-existence of multiple L1 families or lineages. In addition the exchange of genetic information between L1 families is not limited to the 5UTR as evidence of inter-family recombination was observed in ORF1, ORF2, and the 3UTR. In contrast to the human L1, there was little evidence of rapid amino-acid replacement in the coiled-coil of ORF1, although this region is structurally unstable. We propose that the structural instability of the coiled-coil domain might be adaptive and that structural changes in this region are selectively equivalent to the rapid evolution at the amino-acid level reported in the human lineage. Conclusions: The pattern of evolution of L1 in mouse shows some similarity with human suggesting that the nature of the interactions between L1 and its host might be similar in these two species. Yet, some notable differences, particularly in the evolution of ORF1, suggest that the molecular mechanisms involved in host-L1 interactions might be different in these two species.

AB - Background: LINE-1 (L1) is the dominant category of transposable elements in placental mammals. L1 has significantly affected the size and structure of all mammalian genomes and understanding the nature of the interactions between L1 and its mammalian host remains a question of crucial importance in comparative genomics. For this reason, much attention has been dedicated to the evolution of L1. Among the most studied elements is the mouse L1 which has been the subject of a number of studies in the 1980s and 1990s. These seminal studies, performed in the pre-genomic era when only a limited number of L1 sequences were available, have significantly improved our understanding of L1 evolution. Yet, no comprehensive study on the evolution of L1 in mouse has been performed since the completion of this genome sequence. Results: Using the Genome Parsing Suite we performed the first evolutionary analysis of mouse L1 over the entire length of the element. This analysis indicates that the mouse L1 has recruited novel 5UTR sequences more frequently than previously thought and that the simultaneous activity of non-homologous promoters seems to be one of the conditions for the co-existence of multiple L1 families or lineages. In addition the exchange of genetic information between L1 families is not limited to the 5UTR as evidence of inter-family recombination was observed in ORF1, ORF2, and the 3UTR. In contrast to the human L1, there was little evidence of rapid amino-acid replacement in the coiled-coil of ORF1, although this region is structurally unstable. We propose that the structural instability of the coiled-coil domain might be adaptive and that structural changes in this region are selectively equivalent to the rapid evolution at the amino-acid level reported in the human lineage. Conclusions: The pattern of evolution of L1 in mouse shows some similarity with human suggesting that the nature of the interactions between L1 and its host might be similar in these two species. Yet, some notable differences, particularly in the evolution of ORF1, suggest that the molecular mechanisms involved in host-L1 interactions might be different in these two species.

KW - L1

KW - LINE-1

KW - Mus musculus

KW - Recombination

KW - Retroposon

KW - Retrotransposon

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875313166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875313166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1759-8753-4-3

DO - 10.1186/1759-8753-4-3

M3 - Article

C2 - 23286374

AN - SCOPUS:84875313166

VL - 4

JO - Mobile DNA

JF - Mobile DNA

SN - 1759-8753

IS - 1

M1 - 3

ER -