Revisiting mothers' pensions: A critique of a social science classic and a new analysis

Sheera Joy Olasky, David Greenberg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    We identify methodological weaknesses in a paper by Skocpol, AbendWein, Howard, and Lehmann (1993) on the origins of mothers' pensions in the American states in the early twentieth century. These include a sub-optimal and potentially biased strategy for assessing the impact of state characteristics on the time to adoption of pensions, as well as the use of a backward stepwise regression procedure for selecting independent variables. To determine whether Skocpol et al.'s conclusions remain valid, we recreated most of their dataset and used methods that are more appropriate for the analysis of duration data, including the Cox and complementary cloglog event history procedures. While we find support for several of their claims, our findings allow for a more straightforward interpretation of the role of explanatory variables, and the temporal dependence of the adoption process.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)93-119
    Number of pages27
    JournalResearch in Political Sociology
    Volume24
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 2017

    Fingerprint

    pension
    social science
    twentieth century
    regression
    interpretation
    event
    time

    Keywords

    • Event history analysis
    • Mothers' pensions
    • Skocpol
    • Stepwise regression
    • Welfare state
    • Women's associations

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Revisiting mothers' pensions : A critique of a social science classic and a new analysis. / Olasky, Sheera Joy; Greenberg, David.

    In: Research in Political Sociology, Vol. 24, 2017, p. 93-119.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{c44af2dc052f40bfbecde04f676dbb38,
    title = "Revisiting mothers' pensions: A critique of a social science classic and a new analysis",
    abstract = "We identify methodological weaknesses in a paper by Skocpol, AbendWein, Howard, and Lehmann (1993) on the origins of mothers' pensions in the American states in the early twentieth century. These include a sub-optimal and potentially biased strategy for assessing the impact of state characteristics on the time to adoption of pensions, as well as the use of a backward stepwise regression procedure for selecting independent variables. To determine whether Skocpol et al.'s conclusions remain valid, we recreated most of their dataset and used methods that are more appropriate for the analysis of duration data, including the Cox and complementary cloglog event history procedures. While we find support for several of their claims, our findings allow for a more straightforward interpretation of the role of explanatory variables, and the temporal dependence of the adoption process.",
    keywords = "Event history analysis, Mothers' pensions, Skocpol, Stepwise regression, Welfare state, Women's associations",
    author = "Olasky, {Sheera Joy} and David Greenberg",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1108/S0895-993520160000024010",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "24",
    pages = "93--119",
    journal = "Research in Political Sociology",
    issn = "0895-9935",
    publisher = "JAI Press",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Revisiting mothers' pensions

    T2 - A critique of a social science classic and a new analysis

    AU - Olasky, Sheera Joy

    AU - Greenberg, David

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - We identify methodological weaknesses in a paper by Skocpol, AbendWein, Howard, and Lehmann (1993) on the origins of mothers' pensions in the American states in the early twentieth century. These include a sub-optimal and potentially biased strategy for assessing the impact of state characteristics on the time to adoption of pensions, as well as the use of a backward stepwise regression procedure for selecting independent variables. To determine whether Skocpol et al.'s conclusions remain valid, we recreated most of their dataset and used methods that are more appropriate for the analysis of duration data, including the Cox and complementary cloglog event history procedures. While we find support for several of their claims, our findings allow for a more straightforward interpretation of the role of explanatory variables, and the temporal dependence of the adoption process.

    AB - We identify methodological weaknesses in a paper by Skocpol, AbendWein, Howard, and Lehmann (1993) on the origins of mothers' pensions in the American states in the early twentieth century. These include a sub-optimal and potentially biased strategy for assessing the impact of state characteristics on the time to adoption of pensions, as well as the use of a backward stepwise regression procedure for selecting independent variables. To determine whether Skocpol et al.'s conclusions remain valid, we recreated most of their dataset and used methods that are more appropriate for the analysis of duration data, including the Cox and complementary cloglog event history procedures. While we find support for several of their claims, our findings allow for a more straightforward interpretation of the role of explanatory variables, and the temporal dependence of the adoption process.

    KW - Event history analysis

    KW - Mothers' pensions

    KW - Skocpol

    KW - Stepwise regression

    KW - Welfare state

    KW - Women's associations

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006253049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85006253049&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/S0895-993520160000024010

    DO - 10.1108/S0895-993520160000024010

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85006253049

    VL - 24

    SP - 93

    EP - 119

    JO - Research in Political Sociology

    JF - Research in Political Sociology

    SN - 0895-9935

    ER -