Revisiting Ebenbreite

Walter Gerbino, Robert Volcic

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Ebenbreite (Morinaga 1941) is a powerful factor of figure/ground organization. Regions bounded by parallel contours are perceived as figures more easily than regions bounded by non-parallel contours (Metzger 1953). Despite its power to generate elegant demonstrations, the crucial stimulus feature involved in Ebenbreite is unclear. Vertically-oriented stripes used in Morinaga-like patterns can involve two different transformations: (a) translation of a curved contour along a horizontal direction; (b) reflection relative to a curved axis, under a smoothness constraint. At small curvatures the stripes generated by the two transformations are similar; whereas they differ substantially at large curvatures. We performed two experiments to study the possible superiority of reflection over translation, following the general intuition that figural organization based on reflection Ebenbreite might be easier because of its compatibility with a simpler 3D percept. In the first experiment observers judged if a target stripe was present/absent in a pattern made of several stripes, which could be either translatory or reflective, depending on trial. In the second experiment observers searched for a stripe with translation Ebenbreite among distractors with reflection Ebenbreite, or viceversa. In both conditions we found a superiority of reflection over translation, despite the fact that also translation Ebenbreite is compatible with a 3D percept. Such a superiority might depend on the projective compatibility of reflection Ebenbreite with rotational symmetry around an elongation axis.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalJournal of vision
    Volume3
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2003

    Fingerprint

    Intuition
    Direction compound
    Power (Psychology)

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Ophthalmology

    Cite this

    Revisiting Ebenbreite. / Gerbino, Walter; Volcic, Robert.

    In: Journal of vision, Vol. 3, No. 9, 01.12.2003.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Gerbino, W & Volcic, R 2003, 'Revisiting Ebenbreite', Journal of vision, vol. 3, no. 9. https://doi.org/10.1167/3.9.116
    Gerbino, Walter ; Volcic, Robert. / Revisiting Ebenbreite. In: Journal of vision. 2003 ; Vol. 3, No. 9.
    @article{2576b713ab95440b96b87c64e02cb176,
    title = "Revisiting Ebenbreite",
    abstract = "Ebenbreite (Morinaga 1941) is a powerful factor of figure/ground organization. Regions bounded by parallel contours are perceived as figures more easily than regions bounded by non-parallel contours (Metzger 1953). Despite its power to generate elegant demonstrations, the crucial stimulus feature involved in Ebenbreite is unclear. Vertically-oriented stripes used in Morinaga-like patterns can involve two different transformations: (a) translation of a curved contour along a horizontal direction; (b) reflection relative to a curved axis, under a smoothness constraint. At small curvatures the stripes generated by the two transformations are similar; whereas they differ substantially at large curvatures. We performed two experiments to study the possible superiority of reflection over translation, following the general intuition that figural organization based on reflection Ebenbreite might be easier because of its compatibility with a simpler 3D percept. In the first experiment observers judged if a target stripe was present/absent in a pattern made of several stripes, which could be either translatory or reflective, depending on trial. In the second experiment observers searched for a stripe with translation Ebenbreite among distractors with reflection Ebenbreite, or viceversa. In both conditions we found a superiority of reflection over translation, despite the fact that also translation Ebenbreite is compatible with a 3D percept. Such a superiority might depend on the projective compatibility of reflection Ebenbreite with rotational symmetry around an elongation axis.",
    author = "Walter Gerbino and Robert Volcic",
    year = "2003",
    month = "12",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1167/3.9.116",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "3",
    journal = "Journal of vision",
    issn = "1534-7362",
    number = "9",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Revisiting Ebenbreite

    AU - Gerbino, Walter

    AU - Volcic, Robert

    PY - 2003/12/1

    Y1 - 2003/12/1

    N2 - Ebenbreite (Morinaga 1941) is a powerful factor of figure/ground organization. Regions bounded by parallel contours are perceived as figures more easily than regions bounded by non-parallel contours (Metzger 1953). Despite its power to generate elegant demonstrations, the crucial stimulus feature involved in Ebenbreite is unclear. Vertically-oriented stripes used in Morinaga-like patterns can involve two different transformations: (a) translation of a curved contour along a horizontal direction; (b) reflection relative to a curved axis, under a smoothness constraint. At small curvatures the stripes generated by the two transformations are similar; whereas they differ substantially at large curvatures. We performed two experiments to study the possible superiority of reflection over translation, following the general intuition that figural organization based on reflection Ebenbreite might be easier because of its compatibility with a simpler 3D percept. In the first experiment observers judged if a target stripe was present/absent in a pattern made of several stripes, which could be either translatory or reflective, depending on trial. In the second experiment observers searched for a stripe with translation Ebenbreite among distractors with reflection Ebenbreite, or viceversa. In both conditions we found a superiority of reflection over translation, despite the fact that also translation Ebenbreite is compatible with a 3D percept. Such a superiority might depend on the projective compatibility of reflection Ebenbreite with rotational symmetry around an elongation axis.

    AB - Ebenbreite (Morinaga 1941) is a powerful factor of figure/ground organization. Regions bounded by parallel contours are perceived as figures more easily than regions bounded by non-parallel contours (Metzger 1953). Despite its power to generate elegant demonstrations, the crucial stimulus feature involved in Ebenbreite is unclear. Vertically-oriented stripes used in Morinaga-like patterns can involve two different transformations: (a) translation of a curved contour along a horizontal direction; (b) reflection relative to a curved axis, under a smoothness constraint. At small curvatures the stripes generated by the two transformations are similar; whereas they differ substantially at large curvatures. We performed two experiments to study the possible superiority of reflection over translation, following the general intuition that figural organization based on reflection Ebenbreite might be easier because of its compatibility with a simpler 3D percept. In the first experiment observers judged if a target stripe was present/absent in a pattern made of several stripes, which could be either translatory or reflective, depending on trial. In the second experiment observers searched for a stripe with translation Ebenbreite among distractors with reflection Ebenbreite, or viceversa. In both conditions we found a superiority of reflection over translation, despite the fact that also translation Ebenbreite is compatible with a 3D percept. Such a superiority might depend on the projective compatibility of reflection Ebenbreite with rotational symmetry around an elongation axis.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4243169351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4243169351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1167/3.9.116

    DO - 10.1167/3.9.116

    M3 - Article

    VL - 3

    JO - Journal of vision

    JF - Journal of vision

    SN - 1534-7362

    IS - 9

    ER -