Review

The net benefits of depression management in primary care

Sharon Glied, Karin Herzog, Richard Frank

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Depression is often diagnosed and treated in primary care settings. Organizational and systems interventions that restructure primary care practices and train staff have been shown to be cost-effective strategies for treating depression. Funders are increasingly calling for a cost-benefit assessment of such programs. In this study, the authors review existing cost-effectiveness studies of primary care depression treatments, classify them into categories, translate the results into net benefit terms, and assess whether more costly programs generate greater net benefit. The authors find that interventions that provide training to primary care teams in how to manage depression most consistently produce net benefits, with more costly interventions of this type generating larger net benefits than less costly interventions. Collaborative care interventions, which add specialized staff to primary care practices, and therapy interventions, in which clinicians are trained to provide therapy, also generate net social benefits at conventional valuations of quality-adjusted life years.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-274
Number of pages24
JournalMedical Care Research and Review
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Costs and Cost Analysis
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Cost-benefit
  • Depression management
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Review : The net benefits of depression management in primary care. / Glied, Sharon; Herzog, Karin; Frank, Richard.

In: Medical Care Research and Review, Vol. 67, No. 3, 06.2010, p. 251-274.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Glied, Sharon ; Herzog, Karin ; Frank, Richard. / Review : The net benefits of depression management in primary care. In: Medical Care Research and Review. 2010 ; Vol. 67, No. 3. pp. 251-274.
@article{816b1a7f8ca943e889bfd8deebf34825,
title = "Review: The net benefits of depression management in primary care",
abstract = "Depression is often diagnosed and treated in primary care settings. Organizational and systems interventions that restructure primary care practices and train staff have been shown to be cost-effective strategies for treating depression. Funders are increasingly calling for a cost-benefit assessment of such programs. In this study, the authors review existing cost-effectiveness studies of primary care depression treatments, classify them into categories, translate the results into net benefit terms, and assess whether more costly programs generate greater net benefit. The authors find that interventions that provide training to primary care teams in how to manage depression most consistently produce net benefits, with more costly interventions of this type generating larger net benefits than less costly interventions. Collaborative care interventions, which add specialized staff to primary care practices, and therapy interventions, in which clinicians are trained to provide therapy, also generate net social benefits at conventional valuations of quality-adjusted life years.",
keywords = "Cost-benefit, Depression management, Primary care",
author = "Sharon Glied and Karin Herzog and Richard Frank",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1077558709356357",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "251--274",
journal = "Medical Care Research and Review",
issn = "1077-5587",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review

T2 - The net benefits of depression management in primary care

AU - Glied, Sharon

AU - Herzog, Karin

AU - Frank, Richard

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - Depression is often diagnosed and treated in primary care settings. Organizational and systems interventions that restructure primary care practices and train staff have been shown to be cost-effective strategies for treating depression. Funders are increasingly calling for a cost-benefit assessment of such programs. In this study, the authors review existing cost-effectiveness studies of primary care depression treatments, classify them into categories, translate the results into net benefit terms, and assess whether more costly programs generate greater net benefit. The authors find that interventions that provide training to primary care teams in how to manage depression most consistently produce net benefits, with more costly interventions of this type generating larger net benefits than less costly interventions. Collaborative care interventions, which add specialized staff to primary care practices, and therapy interventions, in which clinicians are trained to provide therapy, also generate net social benefits at conventional valuations of quality-adjusted life years.

AB - Depression is often diagnosed and treated in primary care settings. Organizational and systems interventions that restructure primary care practices and train staff have been shown to be cost-effective strategies for treating depression. Funders are increasingly calling for a cost-benefit assessment of such programs. In this study, the authors review existing cost-effectiveness studies of primary care depression treatments, classify them into categories, translate the results into net benefit terms, and assess whether more costly programs generate greater net benefit. The authors find that interventions that provide training to primary care teams in how to manage depression most consistently produce net benefits, with more costly interventions of this type generating larger net benefits than less costly interventions. Collaborative care interventions, which add specialized staff to primary care practices, and therapy interventions, in which clinicians are trained to provide therapy, also generate net social benefits at conventional valuations of quality-adjusted life years.

KW - Cost-benefit

KW - Depression management

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952626663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952626663&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077558709356357

DO - 10.1177/1077558709356357

M3 - Review article

VL - 67

SP - 251

EP - 274

JO - Medical Care Research and Review

JF - Medical Care Research and Review

SN - 1077-5587

IS - 3

ER -