Revealing individual differences in strategy selection through visual motion extrapolation

Jacqueline M. Fulvio, Laurence Maloney, Paul R. Schrater

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Humans are constantly challenged to make use of internal models to fill in missing sensory information. We measured human performance in a simple motion extrapolation task where no feedback was provided in order to elucidate the models of object motion incorporated into observers’ extrapolation strategies. There was no “right” model for extrapolation in this task. Observers consistently adopted one of two models, linear or quadratic, but different observers chose different models. We further demonstrate that differences in motion sensitivity impact the choice of internal models for many observers. These results demonstrate that internal models and individual differences in those models can be elicited by unconstrained, predictive-based psychophysical tasks.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)169-179
Number of pages11
JournalCognitive Neuroscience
Volume6
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Individuality
Linear Models

Keywords

  • Individual differences
  • Internal models
  • Motion extrapolation
  • Uncertainty
  • Visual perception

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Revealing individual differences in strategy selection through visual motion extrapolation. / Fulvio, Jacqueline M.; Maloney, Laurence; Schrater, Paul R.

In: Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2015, p. 169-179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ef7da24976f240b582c3f36a2b08b504,
title = "Revealing individual differences in strategy selection through visual motion extrapolation",
abstract = "Humans are constantly challenged to make use of internal models to fill in missing sensory information. We measured human performance in a simple motion extrapolation task where no feedback was provided in order to elucidate the models of object motion incorporated into observers’ extrapolation strategies. There was no “right” model for extrapolation in this task. Observers consistently adopted one of two models, linear or quadratic, but different observers chose different models. We further demonstrate that differences in motion sensitivity impact the choice of internal models for many observers. These results demonstrate that internal models and individual differences in those models can be elicited by unconstrained, predictive-based psychophysical tasks.",
keywords = "Individual differences, Internal models, Motion extrapolation, Uncertainty, Visual perception",
author = "Fulvio, {Jacqueline M.} and Laurence Maloney and Schrater, {Paul R.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1080/17588928.2014.1003181",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "169--179",
journal = "Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "1758-8928",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revealing individual differences in strategy selection through visual motion extrapolation

AU - Fulvio, Jacqueline M.

AU - Maloney, Laurence

AU - Schrater, Paul R.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Humans are constantly challenged to make use of internal models to fill in missing sensory information. We measured human performance in a simple motion extrapolation task where no feedback was provided in order to elucidate the models of object motion incorporated into observers’ extrapolation strategies. There was no “right” model for extrapolation in this task. Observers consistently adopted one of two models, linear or quadratic, but different observers chose different models. We further demonstrate that differences in motion sensitivity impact the choice of internal models for many observers. These results demonstrate that internal models and individual differences in those models can be elicited by unconstrained, predictive-based psychophysical tasks.

AB - Humans are constantly challenged to make use of internal models to fill in missing sensory information. We measured human performance in a simple motion extrapolation task where no feedback was provided in order to elucidate the models of object motion incorporated into observers’ extrapolation strategies. There was no “right” model for extrapolation in this task. Observers consistently adopted one of two models, linear or quadratic, but different observers chose different models. We further demonstrate that differences in motion sensitivity impact the choice of internal models for many observers. These results demonstrate that internal models and individual differences in those models can be elicited by unconstrained, predictive-based psychophysical tasks.

KW - Individual differences

KW - Internal models

KW - Motion extrapolation

KW - Uncertainty

KW - Visual perception

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954380833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954380833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17588928.2014.1003181

DO - 10.1080/17588928.2014.1003181

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 169

EP - 179

JO - Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 1758-8928

IS - 4

ER -