Returning genetic research results: Study type matters

Amy L. McGuire, Jill Oliver Robinson, Rachel B. Ramoni, Debra S. Morley, Steven Joffe, Sharon E. Plon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: The return of individual genetic research results has been identified as one of the most pressing ethical challenges warranting immediate policy attention. We explored the practices and perspectives of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) investigators on this topic. Materials & methods: Corresponding authors of published GWAS were invited to participate in a semistructured interview. Interviews (n = 35) were transcribed and analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: Most investigators had not returned GWAS results. Several had experience returning results in the context of linkage/family studies, and many felt that it will become a larger issue in whole-genome/-exome sequencing. Conclusions: Research context and nature of the study are important considerations in the decision to return results. More nuanced ethical guidelines should take these contextual factors into account.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)27-34
Number of pages8
JournalPersonalized Medicine
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013

Fingerprint

Genetic Research
Genome-Wide Association Study
Research Personnel
Interviews
Exome
Genome
Guidelines
Research

Keywords

  • ethics
  • genome-wide association
  • genomics
  • policy
  • return of results
  • whole-genome sequencing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

McGuire, A. L., Robinson, J. O., Ramoni, R. B., Morley, D. S., Joffe, S., & Plon, S. E. (2013). Returning genetic research results: Study type matters. Personalized Medicine, 10(1), 27-34. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.12.109

Returning genetic research results : Study type matters. / McGuire, Amy L.; Robinson, Jill Oliver; Ramoni, Rachel B.; Morley, Debra S.; Joffe, Steven; Plon, Sharon E.

In: Personalized Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 1, 01.2013, p. 27-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGuire, AL, Robinson, JO, Ramoni, RB, Morley, DS, Joffe, S & Plon, SE 2013, 'Returning genetic research results: Study type matters', Personalized Medicine, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 27-34. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.12.109
McGuire AL, Robinson JO, Ramoni RB, Morley DS, Joffe S, Plon SE. Returning genetic research results: Study type matters. Personalized Medicine. 2013 Jan;10(1):27-34. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme.12.109
McGuire, Amy L. ; Robinson, Jill Oliver ; Ramoni, Rachel B. ; Morley, Debra S. ; Joffe, Steven ; Plon, Sharon E. / Returning genetic research results : Study type matters. In: Personalized Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 10, No. 1. pp. 27-34.
@article{117d8489eb0747e8a59df388aa5af703,
title = "Returning genetic research results: Study type matters",
abstract = "Aim: The return of individual genetic research results has been identified as one of the most pressing ethical challenges warranting immediate policy attention. We explored the practices and perspectives of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) investigators on this topic. Materials & methods: Corresponding authors of published GWAS were invited to participate in a semistructured interview. Interviews (n = 35) were transcribed and analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: Most investigators had not returned GWAS results. Several had experience returning results in the context of linkage/family studies, and many felt that it will become a larger issue in whole-genome/-exome sequencing. Conclusions: Research context and nature of the study are important considerations in the decision to return results. More nuanced ethical guidelines should take these contextual factors into account.",
keywords = "ethics, genome-wide association, genomics, policy, return of results, whole-genome sequencing",
author = "McGuire, {Amy L.} and Robinson, {Jill Oliver} and Ramoni, {Rachel B.} and Morley, {Debra S.} and Steven Joffe and Plon, {Sharon E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.2217/pme.12.109",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "27--34",
journal = "Personalized Medicine",
issn = "1741-0541",
publisher = "Future Medicine Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Returning genetic research results

T2 - Study type matters

AU - McGuire, Amy L.

AU - Robinson, Jill Oliver

AU - Ramoni, Rachel B.

AU - Morley, Debra S.

AU - Joffe, Steven

AU - Plon, Sharon E.

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Aim: The return of individual genetic research results has been identified as one of the most pressing ethical challenges warranting immediate policy attention. We explored the practices and perspectives of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) investigators on this topic. Materials & methods: Corresponding authors of published GWAS were invited to participate in a semistructured interview. Interviews (n = 35) were transcribed and analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: Most investigators had not returned GWAS results. Several had experience returning results in the context of linkage/family studies, and many felt that it will become a larger issue in whole-genome/-exome sequencing. Conclusions: Research context and nature of the study are important considerations in the decision to return results. More nuanced ethical guidelines should take these contextual factors into account.

AB - Aim: The return of individual genetic research results has been identified as one of the most pressing ethical challenges warranting immediate policy attention. We explored the practices and perspectives of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) investigators on this topic. Materials & methods: Corresponding authors of published GWAS were invited to participate in a semistructured interview. Interviews (n = 35) were transcribed and analyzed using conventional content analysis. Results: Most investigators had not returned GWAS results. Several had experience returning results in the context of linkage/family studies, and many felt that it will become a larger issue in whole-genome/-exome sequencing. Conclusions: Research context and nature of the study are important considerations in the decision to return results. More nuanced ethical guidelines should take these contextual factors into account.

KW - ethics

KW - genome-wide association

KW - genomics

KW - policy

KW - return of results

KW - whole-genome sequencing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871462894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871462894&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2217/pme.12.109

DO - 10.2217/pme.12.109

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 27

EP - 34

JO - Personalized Medicine

JF - Personalized Medicine

SN - 1741-0541

IS - 1

ER -