Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: Evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention

Tara McAllister Byun, Elaine R. Hitchcock, Michelle T. Swartz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Method: Eight participants received 8 weeks of individual ultrasound biofeedback treatment targeting rhotics. In Study 1, all 4 participants were cued to match a bunched tongue-shape target. In Study 2, participants received individualized cues aimed at eliciting the tongue shape most facilitative of perceptually correct rhotics.

Purpose: To document the efficacy of ultrasound biofeedback treatment for misarticulation of the North American English rhotic in children. Because of limited progress in the first cohort, a series of two closely related studies was conducted in place of a single study. The studies differed primarily in the nature of tongue-shape targets (e.g., retroflex, bunched) cued during treatment.

Results: Participants in Study 1 showed only minimal treatment effects. In Study 2, all participants demonstrated improved production of rhotics in untreated words produced without biofeedback, with large to very large effect sizes.

Conclusions: The results of Study 2 indicate that with proper parameters of treatment, ultrasound biofeedback can be a highly effective intervention for children with persistent rhotic errors. In addition, qualitative comparison of Studies 1 and 2 suggests that treatment for the North American English rhotic should include opportunities to explore different tongue shapes, to find the most facilitative variant for each individual speaker.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2116-2130
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Volume57
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Articulation Disorders
Tongue
evidence
Therapeutics
Cues
Biofeedback (Psychology)
Retroflex
Ultrasound
Rhotics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation : Evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention. / McAllister Byun, Tara; Hitchcock, Elaine R.; Swartz, Michelle T.

In: Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, Vol. 57, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 2116-2130.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ab529eca6abe42bbace4c3c3063bf598,
title = "Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation: Evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention",
abstract = "Method: Eight participants received 8 weeks of individual ultrasound biofeedback treatment targeting rhotics. In Study 1, all 4 participants were cued to match a bunched tongue-shape target. In Study 2, participants received individualized cues aimed at eliciting the tongue shape most facilitative of perceptually correct rhotics.Purpose: To document the efficacy of ultrasound biofeedback treatment for misarticulation of the North American English rhotic in children. Because of limited progress in the first cohort, a series of two closely related studies was conducted in place of a single study. The studies differed primarily in the nature of tongue-shape targets (e.g., retroflex, bunched) cued during treatment.Results: Participants in Study 1 showed only minimal treatment effects. In Study 2, all participants demonstrated improved production of rhotics in untreated words produced without biofeedback, with large to very large effect sizes.Conclusions: The results of Study 2 indicate that with proper parameters of treatment, ultrasound biofeedback can be a highly effective intervention for children with persistent rhotic errors. In addition, qualitative comparison of Studies 1 and 2 suggests that treatment for the North American English rhotic should include opportunities to explore different tongue shapes, to find the most facilitative variant for each individual speaker.",
author = "{McAllister Byun}, Tara and Hitchcock, {Elaine R.} and Swartz, {Michelle T.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "2116--2130",
journal = "Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research",
issn = "1092-4388",
publisher = "American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA)",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retroflex versus bunched in treatment for rhotic misarticulation

T2 - Evidence from ultrasound biofeedback intervention

AU - McAllister Byun, Tara

AU - Hitchcock, Elaine R.

AU - Swartz, Michelle T.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Method: Eight participants received 8 weeks of individual ultrasound biofeedback treatment targeting rhotics. In Study 1, all 4 participants were cued to match a bunched tongue-shape target. In Study 2, participants received individualized cues aimed at eliciting the tongue shape most facilitative of perceptually correct rhotics.Purpose: To document the efficacy of ultrasound biofeedback treatment for misarticulation of the North American English rhotic in children. Because of limited progress in the first cohort, a series of two closely related studies was conducted in place of a single study. The studies differed primarily in the nature of tongue-shape targets (e.g., retroflex, bunched) cued during treatment.Results: Participants in Study 1 showed only minimal treatment effects. In Study 2, all participants demonstrated improved production of rhotics in untreated words produced without biofeedback, with large to very large effect sizes.Conclusions: The results of Study 2 indicate that with proper parameters of treatment, ultrasound biofeedback can be a highly effective intervention for children with persistent rhotic errors. In addition, qualitative comparison of Studies 1 and 2 suggests that treatment for the North American English rhotic should include opportunities to explore different tongue shapes, to find the most facilitative variant for each individual speaker.

AB - Method: Eight participants received 8 weeks of individual ultrasound biofeedback treatment targeting rhotics. In Study 1, all 4 participants were cued to match a bunched tongue-shape target. In Study 2, participants received individualized cues aimed at eliciting the tongue shape most facilitative of perceptually correct rhotics.Purpose: To document the efficacy of ultrasound biofeedback treatment for misarticulation of the North American English rhotic in children. Because of limited progress in the first cohort, a series of two closely related studies was conducted in place of a single study. The studies differed primarily in the nature of tongue-shape targets (e.g., retroflex, bunched) cued during treatment.Results: Participants in Study 1 showed only minimal treatment effects. In Study 2, all participants demonstrated improved production of rhotics in untreated words produced without biofeedback, with large to very large effect sizes.Conclusions: The results of Study 2 indicate that with proper parameters of treatment, ultrasound biofeedback can be a highly effective intervention for children with persistent rhotic errors. In addition, qualitative comparison of Studies 1 and 2 suggests that treatment for the North American English rhotic should include opportunities to explore different tongue shapes, to find the most facilitative variant for each individual speaker.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84918768963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84918768963&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034

DO - 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-14-0034

M3 - Article

C2 - 25088034

AN - SCOPUS:84918768963

VL - 57

SP - 2116

EP - 2130

JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

SN - 1092-4388

IS - 6

ER -