Rethinking the Nature of Cruelty: The Role of Identity Leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment

S. Alexander Haslam, Stephen D. Reicher, Jay J. Van Bavel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of the most famous studies in the history of psychology. For nearly a half century it has been understood to show that assigning people to a toxic role will, on its own, unlock the human capacity to treat others with cruelty. In contrast, principles of identity leadership argue that roles are unlikely to elicit cruelty unless leaders encourage potential perpetrators to identify with what is presented as a noble ingroup cause and to believe their actions are necessary for the advancement of that cause. Although identity leadership has been implicated in behavior ranging from electoral success to obedience to authority, researchers have hitherto had limited capacity to establish whether role conformity or identity leadership provides a better account of the cruelty observed in the SPE. Through examination of material in the SPE archive, we present comprehensive evidence that, rather than guards conforming to role of their own accord, experimenters directly encouraged them to adopt roles and act tough in a manner consistent with tenets of identity leadership. Implications for the analysis of conformity and cruelty as well as for interpretation of the SPE are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Psychologist
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Prisons
Poisons
History
Research Personnel
Psychology

Keywords

  • Followership
  • Identity entrepreneurship
  • Leadership
  • Social identification
  • Stanford Prison Experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Rethinking the Nature of Cruelty : The Role of Identity Leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment. / Haslam, S. Alexander; Reicher, Stephen D.; Van Bavel, Jay J.

In: American Psychologist, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4ea87f54719e498bb49ae625f91b801b,
title = "Rethinking the Nature of Cruelty: The Role of Identity Leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment",
abstract = "The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of the most famous studies in the history of psychology. For nearly a half century it has been understood to show that assigning people to a toxic role will, on its own, unlock the human capacity to treat others with cruelty. In contrast, principles of identity leadership argue that roles are unlikely to elicit cruelty unless leaders encourage potential perpetrators to identify with what is presented as a noble ingroup cause and to believe their actions are necessary for the advancement of that cause. Although identity leadership has been implicated in behavior ranging from electoral success to obedience to authority, researchers have hitherto had limited capacity to establish whether role conformity or identity leadership provides a better account of the cruelty observed in the SPE. Through examination of material in the SPE archive, we present comprehensive evidence that, rather than guards conforming to role of their own accord, experimenters directly encouraged them to adopt roles and act tough in a manner consistent with tenets of identity leadership. Implications for the analysis of conformity and cruelty as well as for interpretation of the SPE are discussed.",
keywords = "Followership, Identity entrepreneurship, Leadership, Social identification, Stanford Prison Experiment",
author = "Haslam, {S. Alexander} and Reicher, {Stephen D.} and {Van Bavel}, {Jay J.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/amp0000443",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Psychologist",
issn = "0003-066X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking the Nature of Cruelty

T2 - The Role of Identity Leadership in the Stanford Prison Experiment

AU - Haslam, S. Alexander

AU - Reicher, Stephen D.

AU - Van Bavel, Jay J.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of the most famous studies in the history of psychology. For nearly a half century it has been understood to show that assigning people to a toxic role will, on its own, unlock the human capacity to treat others with cruelty. In contrast, principles of identity leadership argue that roles are unlikely to elicit cruelty unless leaders encourage potential perpetrators to identify with what is presented as a noble ingroup cause and to believe their actions are necessary for the advancement of that cause. Although identity leadership has been implicated in behavior ranging from electoral success to obedience to authority, researchers have hitherto had limited capacity to establish whether role conformity or identity leadership provides a better account of the cruelty observed in the SPE. Through examination of material in the SPE archive, we present comprehensive evidence that, rather than guards conforming to role of their own accord, experimenters directly encouraged them to adopt roles and act tough in a manner consistent with tenets of identity leadership. Implications for the analysis of conformity and cruelty as well as for interpretation of the SPE are discussed.

AB - The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) is one of the most famous studies in the history of psychology. For nearly a half century it has been understood to show that assigning people to a toxic role will, on its own, unlock the human capacity to treat others with cruelty. In contrast, principles of identity leadership argue that roles are unlikely to elicit cruelty unless leaders encourage potential perpetrators to identify with what is presented as a noble ingroup cause and to believe their actions are necessary for the advancement of that cause. Although identity leadership has been implicated in behavior ranging from electoral success to obedience to authority, researchers have hitherto had limited capacity to establish whether role conformity or identity leadership provides a better account of the cruelty observed in the SPE. Through examination of material in the SPE archive, we present comprehensive evidence that, rather than guards conforming to role of their own accord, experimenters directly encouraged them to adopt roles and act tough in a manner consistent with tenets of identity leadership. Implications for the analysis of conformity and cruelty as well as for interpretation of the SPE are discussed.

KW - Followership

KW - Identity entrepreneurship

KW - Leadership

KW - Social identification

KW - Stanford Prison Experiment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068459573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068459573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/amp0000443

DO - 10.1037/amp0000443

M3 - Article

C2 - 31380665

AN - SCOPUS:85068459573

JO - American Psychologist

JF - American Psychologist

SN - 0003-066X

ER -