Restrictive workplace smoking policies

Impact on nonsmokers’ tobacco exposure

Bess H. Marcus, Karen M. Emmons, David Abrams, Robert J. Marshall, Margaret Kane, Thomas E. Novotny, Ruth A. Etzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The health consequences of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) are well documented. Although nonsmokers are generally aware of the health risks of ETS exposure, the majority of nonsmokers are regularly exposed. The most common source of exposure is the workplace. Restrictive workplace smoking policies are being used as a primary means of reducing ETS exposure. However, few studies have focused on the relation between workplace policy and ETS exposure. We performed two studies which examined the relationship between smoking policy, self-reported ETS exposure, and salivary cotinine concentrations. Study 1, a pilot study, focused on a workplace-based sample of 106 volunteers; Study 2 examined exposure among 881 nonsmokers in workplace settings. In both studies, more restrictive workplace smoking policies were associated with a lower proportion of nonsmoking volunteers with detectable salivary cotinine. In Study 2, the larger study, the only other variable found to be significantly related to cotinine detection was the presence of smokers in the home. These results suggest that restrictive workplace smoking policies may reduce employees’ overall ETS exposure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)42-51
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Public Health Policy
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 1992

Fingerprint

Workplace
Tobacco
Smoke
Smoking
Cotinine
Volunteers
Environmental Policy
Environmental Health
Environmental Exposure
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Marcus, B. H., Emmons, K. M., Abrams, D., Marshall, R. J., Kane, M., Novotny, T. E., & Etzel, R. A. (1992). Restrictive workplace smoking policies: Impact on nonsmokers’ tobacco exposure. Journal of Public Health Policy, 13(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3343057

Restrictive workplace smoking policies : Impact on nonsmokers’ tobacco exposure. / Marcus, Bess H.; Emmons, Karen M.; Abrams, David; Marshall, Robert J.; Kane, Margaret; Novotny, Thomas E.; Etzel, Ruth A.

In: Journal of Public Health Policy, Vol. 13, No. 1, 01.03.1992, p. 42-51.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marcus, BH, Emmons, KM, Abrams, D, Marshall, RJ, Kane, M, Novotny, TE & Etzel, RA 1992, 'Restrictive workplace smoking policies: Impact on nonsmokers’ tobacco exposure', Journal of Public Health Policy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 42-51. https://doi.org/10.2307/3343057
Marcus, Bess H. ; Emmons, Karen M. ; Abrams, David ; Marshall, Robert J. ; Kane, Margaret ; Novotny, Thomas E. ; Etzel, Ruth A. / Restrictive workplace smoking policies : Impact on nonsmokers’ tobacco exposure. In: Journal of Public Health Policy. 1992 ; Vol. 13, No. 1. pp. 42-51.
@article{f96779e5c8d9426d835ec9dc3cc97e51,
title = "Restrictive workplace smoking policies: Impact on nonsmokers’ tobacco exposure",
abstract = "The health consequences of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) are well documented. Although nonsmokers are generally aware of the health risks of ETS exposure, the majority of nonsmokers are regularly exposed. The most common source of exposure is the workplace. Restrictive workplace smoking policies are being used as a primary means of reducing ETS exposure. However, few studies have focused on the relation between workplace policy and ETS exposure. We performed two studies which examined the relationship between smoking policy, self-reported ETS exposure, and salivary cotinine concentrations. Study 1, a pilot study, focused on a workplace-based sample of 106 volunteers; Study 2 examined exposure among 881 nonsmokers in workplace settings. In both studies, more restrictive workplace smoking policies were associated with a lower proportion of nonsmoking volunteers with detectable salivary cotinine. In Study 2, the larger study, the only other variable found to be significantly related to cotinine detection was the presence of smokers in the home. These results suggest that restrictive workplace smoking policies may reduce employees’ overall ETS exposure.",
author = "Marcus, {Bess H.} and Emmons, {Karen M.} and David Abrams and Marshall, {Robert J.} and Margaret Kane and Novotny, {Thomas E.} and Etzel, {Ruth A.}",
year = "1992",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2307/3343057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "42--51",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Policy",
issn = "0197-5897",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Restrictive workplace smoking policies

T2 - Impact on nonsmokers’ tobacco exposure

AU - Marcus, Bess H.

AU - Emmons, Karen M.

AU - Abrams, David

AU - Marshall, Robert J.

AU - Kane, Margaret

AU - Novotny, Thomas E.

AU - Etzel, Ruth A.

PY - 1992/3/1

Y1 - 1992/3/1

N2 - The health consequences of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) are well documented. Although nonsmokers are generally aware of the health risks of ETS exposure, the majority of nonsmokers are regularly exposed. The most common source of exposure is the workplace. Restrictive workplace smoking policies are being used as a primary means of reducing ETS exposure. However, few studies have focused on the relation between workplace policy and ETS exposure. We performed two studies which examined the relationship between smoking policy, self-reported ETS exposure, and salivary cotinine concentrations. Study 1, a pilot study, focused on a workplace-based sample of 106 volunteers; Study 2 examined exposure among 881 nonsmokers in workplace settings. In both studies, more restrictive workplace smoking policies were associated with a lower proportion of nonsmoking volunteers with detectable salivary cotinine. In Study 2, the larger study, the only other variable found to be significantly related to cotinine detection was the presence of smokers in the home. These results suggest that restrictive workplace smoking policies may reduce employees’ overall ETS exposure.

AB - The health consequences of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) are well documented. Although nonsmokers are generally aware of the health risks of ETS exposure, the majority of nonsmokers are regularly exposed. The most common source of exposure is the workplace. Restrictive workplace smoking policies are being used as a primary means of reducing ETS exposure. However, few studies have focused on the relation between workplace policy and ETS exposure. We performed two studies which examined the relationship between smoking policy, self-reported ETS exposure, and salivary cotinine concentrations. Study 1, a pilot study, focused on a workplace-based sample of 106 volunteers; Study 2 examined exposure among 881 nonsmokers in workplace settings. In both studies, more restrictive workplace smoking policies were associated with a lower proportion of nonsmoking volunteers with detectable salivary cotinine. In Study 2, the larger study, the only other variable found to be significantly related to cotinine detection was the presence of smokers in the home. These results suggest that restrictive workplace smoking policies may reduce employees’ overall ETS exposure.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026522148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026522148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2307/3343057

DO - 10.2307/3343057

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 42

EP - 51

JO - Journal of Public Health Policy

JF - Journal of Public Health Policy

SN - 0197-5897

IS - 1

ER -