Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: A magnetoencephalography study

Timothy Leffel, Miriam Lauter, Masha Westerlund, Liina Pylkkänen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1191-1204
Number of pages14
JournalLanguage, Cognition and Neuroscience
Volume29
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Magnetoencephalography
Temporal Lobe
stimulus
pragmatics
brain
paradigm
language
Language
Brain
Research
Adjective
Determiners
Contextual
Stimulus

Keywords

  • Composition
  • Left anterior temporal lobe
  • MEG
  • Pragmatics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition : A magnetoencephalography study. / Leffel, Timothy; Lauter, Miriam; Westerlund, Masha; Pylkkänen, Liina.

In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Vol. 29, No. 10, 2014, p. 1191-1204.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leffel, Timothy ; Lauter, Miriam ; Westerlund, Masha ; Pylkkänen, Liina. / Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition : A magnetoencephalography study. In: Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. 2014 ; Vol. 29, No. 10. pp. 1191-1204.
@article{4b0f34a48ece4c3ab731a2a8d3224e5f,
title = "Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition: A magnetoencephalography study",
abstract = "Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors.",
keywords = "Composition, Left anterior temporal lobe, MEG, Pragmatics",
author = "Timothy Leffel and Miriam Lauter and Masha Westerlund and Liina Pylkk{\"a}nen",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1080/23273798.2014.956765",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "1191--1204",
journal = "Language, Cognition and Neuroscience",
issn = "2327-3798",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Restrictive vs. non-restrictive composition

T2 - A magnetoencephalography study

AU - Leffel, Timothy

AU - Lauter, Miriam

AU - Westerlund, Masha

AU - Pylkkänen, Liina

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors.

AB - Recent research on the brain mechanisms underlying language processing has implicated the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL) as a central region for the composition of simple phrases. Because these studies typically present their critical stimuli without contextual information, the sensitivity of LATL responses to contextual factors is unknown. In this magnetoencephalography (MEG) study, we employed a simple question-answer paradigm to manipulate whether a prenominal adjective or determiner is interpreted restrictively, i.e., as limiting the set of entities under discussion. Our results show that the LATL is sensitive to restriction, with restrictive composition eliciting higher responses than non-restrictive composition. However, this effect was only observed when the restricting element was a determiner, adjectival stimuli showing the opposite pattern, which we hypothesise to be driven by the special pragmatic properties of non-restrictive adjectives. Overall, our results demonstrate a robust sensitivity of the LATL to high level contextual and potentially also pragmatic factors.

KW - Composition

KW - Left anterior temporal lobe

KW - MEG

KW - Pragmatics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930625970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930625970&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/23273798.2014.956765

DO - 10.1080/23273798.2014.956765

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84930625970

VL - 29

SP - 1191

EP - 1204

JO - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

JF - Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

SN - 2327-3798

IS - 10

ER -