Responsiveness without Representation: Evidence from Minimum Wage Laws in U.S. States

Gabor Simonovits, Andrew M. Guess, Jonathan Nagler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

How well does public policy represent mass preferences in U.S. states? Current approaches provide an incomplete account of statehouse democracy because they fail to compare preferences and policies on meaningful scales. Here, we overcome this problem by generating estimates of Americans' preferences on the minimum wage and compare them to observed policies both within and across states. Because we measure both preferences and policies on the same scale (U.S. dollars), we can quantify both the association of policy outcomes with preferences across states (responsiveness) and their deviation within states (bias). We demonstrate that while minimum wages respond to corresponding preferences across states, policy outcomes are more conservative than preferences in each state, with the average policy bias amounting to about two dollars. We also show that policy bias is substantially smaller in states with access to direct democratic institutions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Political Science
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

minimum wage
Law
evidence
dollar
trend
public policy
democracy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Responsiveness without Representation : Evidence from Minimum Wage Laws in U.S. States. / Simonovits, Gabor; Guess, Andrew M.; Nagler, Jonathan.

In: American Journal of Political Science, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e8808e3650f44bacbaab1fa1ae3ee1c7,
title = "Responsiveness without Representation: Evidence from Minimum Wage Laws in U.S. States",
abstract = "How well does public policy represent mass preferences in U.S. states? Current approaches provide an incomplete account of statehouse democracy because they fail to compare preferences and policies on meaningful scales. Here, we overcome this problem by generating estimates of Americans' preferences on the minimum wage and compare them to observed policies both within and across states. Because we measure both preferences and policies on the same scale (U.S. dollars), we can quantify both the association of policy outcomes with preferences across states (responsiveness) and their deviation within states (bias). We demonstrate that while minimum wages respond to corresponding preferences across states, policy outcomes are more conservative than preferences in each state, with the average policy bias amounting to about two dollars. We also show that policy bias is substantially smaller in states with access to direct democratic institutions.",
author = "Gabor Simonovits and Guess, {Andrew M.} and Jonathan Nagler",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ajps.12412",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Political Science",
issn = "0092-5853",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsiveness without Representation

T2 - Evidence from Minimum Wage Laws in U.S. States

AU - Simonovits, Gabor

AU - Guess, Andrew M.

AU - Nagler, Jonathan

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - How well does public policy represent mass preferences in U.S. states? Current approaches provide an incomplete account of statehouse democracy because they fail to compare preferences and policies on meaningful scales. Here, we overcome this problem by generating estimates of Americans' preferences on the minimum wage and compare them to observed policies both within and across states. Because we measure both preferences and policies on the same scale (U.S. dollars), we can quantify both the association of policy outcomes with preferences across states (responsiveness) and their deviation within states (bias). We demonstrate that while minimum wages respond to corresponding preferences across states, policy outcomes are more conservative than preferences in each state, with the average policy bias amounting to about two dollars. We also show that policy bias is substantially smaller in states with access to direct democratic institutions.

AB - How well does public policy represent mass preferences in U.S. states? Current approaches provide an incomplete account of statehouse democracy because they fail to compare preferences and policies on meaningful scales. Here, we overcome this problem by generating estimates of Americans' preferences on the minimum wage and compare them to observed policies both within and across states. Because we measure both preferences and policies on the same scale (U.S. dollars), we can quantify both the association of policy outcomes with preferences across states (responsiveness) and their deviation within states (bias). We demonstrate that while minimum wages respond to corresponding preferences across states, policy outcomes are more conservative than preferences in each state, with the average policy bias amounting to about two dollars. We also show that policy bias is substantially smaller in states with access to direct democratic institutions.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057457426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057457426&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ajps.12412

DO - 10.1111/ajps.12412

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85057457426

JO - American Journal of Political Science

JF - American Journal of Political Science

SN - 0092-5853

ER -