Responsive consumerism: Empowerment in markets for health plans

Brian D. Elbel, Mark Schlesinger

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Context: American health policy is increasingly relying on consumerism to improve its performance. This article examines a neglected aspect of medical consumerism: the extent to which consumers respond to problems with their health plans. Methods: Using a telephone survey of five thousand consumers conducted in 2002, this article assesses how frequently consumers voice formal grievances or exit from their health plan in response to problems of differing severity. This article also examines the potential impact of this responsiveness on both individuals and the market. In addition, using cross-group comparisons of means and regressions, it looks at how the responses of "empowered" consumers compared with those who are "less empowered." Findings: The vast majority of consumers do not formally voice their complaints or exit health plans, even in response to problems with significant consequences. "Empowered" consumers are only minimally more likely to formally voice and no more likely to leave their plan. Moreover, given the greater prevalence of trivial problems, consumers are much more likely to complain or leave their plans because of problems that are not severe. Greater empowerment does not alleviate this. Conclusions: While much of the attention on consumerism has focused on prospective choice, understanding how consumers respond to problems is equally, if not more, important. Relying on consumers' responses as a means to protect individual consumers or influence the market for health plans is unlikely to be successful in its current form.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)633-682
Number of pages50
JournalMilbank Quarterly
Volume87
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Health
Health Policy
Telephone
Power (Psychology)
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Consumerism
  • Exit
  • Health plans
  • Markets
  • Responsive consumerism
  • Voice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Responsive consumerism : Empowerment in markets for health plans. / Elbel, Brian D.; Schlesinger, Mark.

In: Milbank Quarterly, Vol. 87, No. 3, 09.2009, p. 633-682.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Elbel, Brian D. ; Schlesinger, Mark. / Responsive consumerism : Empowerment in markets for health plans. In: Milbank Quarterly. 2009 ; Vol. 87, No. 3. pp. 633-682.
@article{c90d7a52ab49475b8a12317dcd276a14,
title = "Responsive consumerism: Empowerment in markets for health plans",
abstract = "Context: American health policy is increasingly relying on consumerism to improve its performance. This article examines a neglected aspect of medical consumerism: the extent to which consumers respond to problems with their health plans. Methods: Using a telephone survey of five thousand consumers conducted in 2002, this article assesses how frequently consumers voice formal grievances or exit from their health plan in response to problems of differing severity. This article also examines the potential impact of this responsiveness on both individuals and the market. In addition, using cross-group comparisons of means and regressions, it looks at how the responses of {"}empowered{"} consumers compared with those who are {"}less empowered.{"} Findings: The vast majority of consumers do not formally voice their complaints or exit health plans, even in response to problems with significant consequences. {"}Empowered{"} consumers are only minimally more likely to formally voice and no more likely to leave their plan. Moreover, given the greater prevalence of trivial problems, consumers are much more likely to complain or leave their plans because of problems that are not severe. Greater empowerment does not alleviate this. Conclusions: While much of the attention on consumerism has focused on prospective choice, understanding how consumers respond to problems is equally, if not more, important. Relying on consumers' responses as a means to protect individual consumers or influence the market for health plans is unlikely to be successful in its current form.",
keywords = "Consumerism, Exit, Health plans, Markets, Responsive consumerism, Voice",
author = "Elbel, {Brian D.} and Mark Schlesinger",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00574.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "633--682",
journal = "Milbank Quarterly",
issn = "0887-378X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsive consumerism

T2 - Empowerment in markets for health plans

AU - Elbel, Brian D.

AU - Schlesinger, Mark

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - Context: American health policy is increasingly relying on consumerism to improve its performance. This article examines a neglected aspect of medical consumerism: the extent to which consumers respond to problems with their health plans. Methods: Using a telephone survey of five thousand consumers conducted in 2002, this article assesses how frequently consumers voice formal grievances or exit from their health plan in response to problems of differing severity. This article also examines the potential impact of this responsiveness on both individuals and the market. In addition, using cross-group comparisons of means and regressions, it looks at how the responses of "empowered" consumers compared with those who are "less empowered." Findings: The vast majority of consumers do not formally voice their complaints or exit health plans, even in response to problems with significant consequences. "Empowered" consumers are only minimally more likely to formally voice and no more likely to leave their plan. Moreover, given the greater prevalence of trivial problems, consumers are much more likely to complain or leave their plans because of problems that are not severe. Greater empowerment does not alleviate this. Conclusions: While much of the attention on consumerism has focused on prospective choice, understanding how consumers respond to problems is equally, if not more, important. Relying on consumers' responses as a means to protect individual consumers or influence the market for health plans is unlikely to be successful in its current form.

AB - Context: American health policy is increasingly relying on consumerism to improve its performance. This article examines a neglected aspect of medical consumerism: the extent to which consumers respond to problems with their health plans. Methods: Using a telephone survey of five thousand consumers conducted in 2002, this article assesses how frequently consumers voice formal grievances or exit from their health plan in response to problems of differing severity. This article also examines the potential impact of this responsiveness on both individuals and the market. In addition, using cross-group comparisons of means and regressions, it looks at how the responses of "empowered" consumers compared with those who are "less empowered." Findings: The vast majority of consumers do not formally voice their complaints or exit health plans, even in response to problems with significant consequences. "Empowered" consumers are only minimally more likely to formally voice and no more likely to leave their plan. Moreover, given the greater prevalence of trivial problems, consumers are much more likely to complain or leave their plans because of problems that are not severe. Greater empowerment does not alleviate this. Conclusions: While much of the attention on consumerism has focused on prospective choice, understanding how consumers respond to problems is equally, if not more, important. Relying on consumers' responses as a means to protect individual consumers or influence the market for health plans is unlikely to be successful in its current form.

KW - Consumerism

KW - Exit

KW - Health plans

KW - Markets

KW - Responsive consumerism

KW - Voice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69949154161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69949154161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00574.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00574.x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 19751285

AN - SCOPUS:69949154161

VL - 87

SP - 633

EP - 682

JO - Milbank Quarterly

JF - Milbank Quarterly

SN - 0887-378X

IS - 3

ER -