Response to reviewers on “The Tyranny of Experts”

William Easterly

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    I respond to the three excellent reviewers, who have covered well some of the most difficult issues raised by the arguments in The Tyranny of Experts. These include the good intentions of aid officials supporting autocrats, the role of Western history and current Western travails in the debate on freedom, distinguishing good and bad experts, advocating principles vs. tangible interventions, the serious flaws of democracy and not overstating the case for democracy, the question of whether some academics are also technocrats, the value of freedom as an end in itself, and the definition of democracy as to whether it includes individual rights. Finally and most controversially, I address the biggest question raised by the reviewers (and many others): what should we do? I say why I believe this question is the wrong one, why I refuse to answer it, and suggest more constructive ways to debate freedom and development.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)425-441
    Number of pages17
    JournalReview of Austrian Economics
    Volume28
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jul 24 2015

    Fingerprint

    Democracy
    Individual rights

    Keywords

    • Economic development
    • Economic freedom
    • Foreign aid
    • Individual rights
    • Institutions
    • Political freedom

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)

    Cite this

    Response to reviewers on “The Tyranny of Experts”. / Easterly, William.

    In: Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 24.07.2015, p. 425-441.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Easterly, William. / Response to reviewers on “The Tyranny of Experts”. In: Review of Austrian Economics. 2015 ; Vol. 28, No. 4. pp. 425-441.
    @article{195993effa2e49d1a5b0333415d7dfe8,
    title = "Response to reviewers on “The Tyranny of Experts”",
    abstract = "I respond to the three excellent reviewers, who have covered well some of the most difficult issues raised by the arguments in The Tyranny of Experts. These include the good intentions of aid officials supporting autocrats, the role of Western history and current Western travails in the debate on freedom, distinguishing good and bad experts, advocating principles vs. tangible interventions, the serious flaws of democracy and not overstating the case for democracy, the question of whether some academics are also technocrats, the value of freedom as an end in itself, and the definition of democracy as to whether it includes individual rights. Finally and most controversially, I address the biggest question raised by the reviewers (and many others): what should we do? I say why I believe this question is the wrong one, why I refuse to answer it, and suggest more constructive ways to debate freedom and development.",
    keywords = "Economic development, Economic freedom, Foreign aid, Individual rights, Institutions, Political freedom",
    author = "William Easterly",
    year = "2015",
    month = "7",
    day = "24",
    doi = "10.1007/s11138-015-0326-8",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "28",
    pages = "425--441",
    journal = "Review of Austrian Economics",
    issn = "0889-3047",
    publisher = "Kluwer Academic Publishers",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Response to reviewers on “The Tyranny of Experts”

    AU - Easterly, William

    PY - 2015/7/24

    Y1 - 2015/7/24

    N2 - I respond to the three excellent reviewers, who have covered well some of the most difficult issues raised by the arguments in The Tyranny of Experts. These include the good intentions of aid officials supporting autocrats, the role of Western history and current Western travails in the debate on freedom, distinguishing good and bad experts, advocating principles vs. tangible interventions, the serious flaws of democracy and not overstating the case for democracy, the question of whether some academics are also technocrats, the value of freedom as an end in itself, and the definition of democracy as to whether it includes individual rights. Finally and most controversially, I address the biggest question raised by the reviewers (and many others): what should we do? I say why I believe this question is the wrong one, why I refuse to answer it, and suggest more constructive ways to debate freedom and development.

    AB - I respond to the three excellent reviewers, who have covered well some of the most difficult issues raised by the arguments in The Tyranny of Experts. These include the good intentions of aid officials supporting autocrats, the role of Western history and current Western travails in the debate on freedom, distinguishing good and bad experts, advocating principles vs. tangible interventions, the serious flaws of democracy and not overstating the case for democracy, the question of whether some academics are also technocrats, the value of freedom as an end in itself, and the definition of democracy as to whether it includes individual rights. Finally and most controversially, I address the biggest question raised by the reviewers (and many others): what should we do? I say why I believe this question is the wrong one, why I refuse to answer it, and suggest more constructive ways to debate freedom and development.

    KW - Economic development

    KW - Economic freedom

    KW - Foreign aid

    KW - Individual rights

    KW - Institutions

    KW - Political freedom

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945435303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945435303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1007/s11138-015-0326-8

    DO - 10.1007/s11138-015-0326-8

    M3 - Article

    VL - 28

    SP - 425

    EP - 441

    JO - Review of Austrian Economics

    JF - Review of Austrian Economics

    SN - 0889-3047

    IS - 4

    ER -