Resource allocation, emergency response capability, and infrastructure concentration around vulnerable sites

Jeffrey S. Simonoff, Carlos E. Restrepo, Rae Zimmerman, Zvia Segal Naphtali, Henry H. Willis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Public and private decision-makers continue to seek risk-based approaches to allocate funds to help communities respond to disasters, accidents, and terrorist attacks involving critical infrastructure facilities. The requirements for emergency response capability depend both upon risks within a region's jurisdiction and mutual aid agreements that have been made with other regions. In general, regions in close proximity to infrastructure would benefit more from resources to improve preparedness because there is a greater potential for an event requiring emergency response to occur if there are more facilities at which such events could occur. Thus, a potentially important input into decisions about allocating funds for security is the proximity of a community to high concentrations of infrastructure systems that potentially could be at risk to an industrial accident, natural disaster, or terrorist attack. In this paper, we describe a methodology for measuring a region's exposure to infrastructure-related risks that captures both a community's concentration of facilities or sites considered to be vulnerable and of the proximity of these facilities to surrounding infrastructure systems. These measures are based on smoothing-based nonparametric probability density estimators, which are then used to estimate the probability of the entire infrastructure occurring within any specified distance of facilities in a county. The set of facilities used in the paper to illustrate the use of this methodology consists of facilities identified as vulnerable through the California Buffer Zone Protection Program. For infrastructure in surrounding areas we use dams judged to be high hazards, and BART tracks. The results show that the methodology provides information about patterns of critical infrastructure in regions that is relevant for decisions about how to allocate terrorism security and emergency preparedness resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)597-613
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Risk Research
Volume14
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Resource allocation
infrastructure
resources
Critical infrastructures
Disasters
Accidents
methodology
accident
Terrorism
community
Emergency response
event
Dams
Hazards
decision maker
jurisdiction
disaster
terrorism
natural disaster
Proximity

Keywords

  • critical infrastructure
  • high hazard dams
  • probability density estimation
  • rapid transit
  • resource allocation
  • terrorist attacks

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
  • Engineering(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Resource allocation, emergency response capability, and infrastructure concentration around vulnerable sites. / Simonoff, Jeffrey S.; Restrepo, Carlos E.; Zimmerman, Rae; Naphtali, Zvia Segal; Willis, Henry H.

In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 14, No. 5, 05.2011, p. 597-613.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simonoff, Jeffrey S. ; Restrepo, Carlos E. ; Zimmerman, Rae ; Naphtali, Zvia Segal ; Willis, Henry H. / Resource allocation, emergency response capability, and infrastructure concentration around vulnerable sites. In: Journal of Risk Research. 2011 ; Vol. 14, No. 5. pp. 597-613.
@article{4d31c09508ae436091825d3a5d55d5a1,
title = "Resource allocation, emergency response capability, and infrastructure concentration around vulnerable sites",
abstract = "Public and private decision-makers continue to seek risk-based approaches to allocate funds to help communities respond to disasters, accidents, and terrorist attacks involving critical infrastructure facilities. The requirements for emergency response capability depend both upon risks within a region's jurisdiction and mutual aid agreements that have been made with other regions. In general, regions in close proximity to infrastructure would benefit more from resources to improve preparedness because there is a greater potential for an event requiring emergency response to occur if there are more facilities at which such events could occur. Thus, a potentially important input into decisions about allocating funds for security is the proximity of a community to high concentrations of infrastructure systems that potentially could be at risk to an industrial accident, natural disaster, or terrorist attack. In this paper, we describe a methodology for measuring a region's exposure to infrastructure-related risks that captures both a community's concentration of facilities or sites considered to be vulnerable and of the proximity of these facilities to surrounding infrastructure systems. These measures are based on smoothing-based nonparametric probability density estimators, which are then used to estimate the probability of the entire infrastructure occurring within any specified distance of facilities in a county. The set of facilities used in the paper to illustrate the use of this methodology consists of facilities identified as vulnerable through the California Buffer Zone Protection Program. For infrastructure in surrounding areas we use dams judged to be high hazards, and BART tracks. The results show that the methodology provides information about patterns of critical infrastructure in regions that is relevant for decisions about how to allocate terrorism security and emergency preparedness resources.",
keywords = "critical infrastructure, high hazard dams, probability density estimation, rapid transit, resource allocation, terrorist attacks",
author = "Simonoff, {Jeffrey S.} and Restrepo, {Carlos E.} and Rae Zimmerman and Naphtali, {Zvia Segal} and Willis, {Henry H.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/13669877.2010.547257",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "597--613",
journal = "Journal of Risk Research",
issn = "1366-9877",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resource allocation, emergency response capability, and infrastructure concentration around vulnerable sites

AU - Simonoff, Jeffrey S.

AU - Restrepo, Carlos E.

AU - Zimmerman, Rae

AU - Naphtali, Zvia Segal

AU - Willis, Henry H.

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Public and private decision-makers continue to seek risk-based approaches to allocate funds to help communities respond to disasters, accidents, and terrorist attacks involving critical infrastructure facilities. The requirements for emergency response capability depend both upon risks within a region's jurisdiction and mutual aid agreements that have been made with other regions. In general, regions in close proximity to infrastructure would benefit more from resources to improve preparedness because there is a greater potential for an event requiring emergency response to occur if there are more facilities at which such events could occur. Thus, a potentially important input into decisions about allocating funds for security is the proximity of a community to high concentrations of infrastructure systems that potentially could be at risk to an industrial accident, natural disaster, or terrorist attack. In this paper, we describe a methodology for measuring a region's exposure to infrastructure-related risks that captures both a community's concentration of facilities or sites considered to be vulnerable and of the proximity of these facilities to surrounding infrastructure systems. These measures are based on smoothing-based nonparametric probability density estimators, which are then used to estimate the probability of the entire infrastructure occurring within any specified distance of facilities in a county. The set of facilities used in the paper to illustrate the use of this methodology consists of facilities identified as vulnerable through the California Buffer Zone Protection Program. For infrastructure in surrounding areas we use dams judged to be high hazards, and BART tracks. The results show that the methodology provides information about patterns of critical infrastructure in regions that is relevant for decisions about how to allocate terrorism security and emergency preparedness resources.

AB - Public and private decision-makers continue to seek risk-based approaches to allocate funds to help communities respond to disasters, accidents, and terrorist attacks involving critical infrastructure facilities. The requirements for emergency response capability depend both upon risks within a region's jurisdiction and mutual aid agreements that have been made with other regions. In general, regions in close proximity to infrastructure would benefit more from resources to improve preparedness because there is a greater potential for an event requiring emergency response to occur if there are more facilities at which such events could occur. Thus, a potentially important input into decisions about allocating funds for security is the proximity of a community to high concentrations of infrastructure systems that potentially could be at risk to an industrial accident, natural disaster, or terrorist attack. In this paper, we describe a methodology for measuring a region's exposure to infrastructure-related risks that captures both a community's concentration of facilities or sites considered to be vulnerable and of the proximity of these facilities to surrounding infrastructure systems. These measures are based on smoothing-based nonparametric probability density estimators, which are then used to estimate the probability of the entire infrastructure occurring within any specified distance of facilities in a county. The set of facilities used in the paper to illustrate the use of this methodology consists of facilities identified as vulnerable through the California Buffer Zone Protection Program. For infrastructure in surrounding areas we use dams judged to be high hazards, and BART tracks. The results show that the methodology provides information about patterns of critical infrastructure in regions that is relevant for decisions about how to allocate terrorism security and emergency preparedness resources.

KW - critical infrastructure

KW - high hazard dams

KW - probability density estimation

KW - rapid transit

KW - resource allocation

KW - terrorist attacks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960929621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960929621&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13669877.2010.547257

DO - 10.1080/13669877.2010.547257

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79960929621

VL - 14

SP - 597

EP - 613

JO - Journal of Risk Research

JF - Journal of Risk Research

SN - 1366-9877

IS - 5

ER -