Research data collection methods: From paper to tablet computers

Adam B. Wilcox, Kathleen D. Gallagher, Bernadette Boden-Albala, Suzanne R. Bakken

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Primary data collection is a critical activity in clinical research. Even with significant advances in technical capabilities, clear benefits of use, and even user preferences for using electronic systems for collecting primary data, paper-based data collection is still common in clinical research settings. However, with recent developments in both clinical research and tablet computer technology, the comparative advantages and disadvantages of data collection methods should be determined. Objective: To describe case studies using multiple methods of data collection, including next-generation tablets, and consider their various advantages and disadvantages. MATERIALS AND Methods: We reviewed 5 modern case studies using primary data collection, using methods ranging from paper to next-generation tablet computers. We performed semistructured telephone interviews with each project, which considered factors relevant to data collection. We address specific issues with workflow, implementation and security for these different methods, and identify differences in implementation that led to different technology considerations for each case study. Results and Discussion: There remain multiple methods for primary data collection, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Two recent methods are electronic health record templates and next-generation tablet computers. Electronic health record templates can link data directly to medical records, but are notably difficult to use. Current tablet computers are substantially different from previous technologies with regard to user familiarity and software cost. The use of cloud-based storage for tablet computers, however, creates a specific challenge for clinical research that must be considered but can be overcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedical Care
Volume50
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2012

Fingerprint

Handheld Computers
Research
Electronic Health Records
Technology
Workflow
Tablets
Medical Records
Software
Interviews
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Clinical research
  • IPad
  • Primary data collection
  • Tablet computers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Research data collection methods : From paper to tablet computers. / Wilcox, Adam B.; Gallagher, Kathleen D.; Boden-Albala, Bernadette; Bakken, Suzanne R.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 50, No. SUPPL. 1, 07.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wilcox, Adam B. ; Gallagher, Kathleen D. ; Boden-Albala, Bernadette ; Bakken, Suzanne R. / Research data collection methods : From paper to tablet computers. In: Medical Care. 2012 ; Vol. 50, No. SUPPL. 1.
@article{3d6be9a320504eefa8a82ff6e4f03398,
title = "Research data collection methods: From paper to tablet computers",
abstract = "Background: Primary data collection is a critical activity in clinical research. Even with significant advances in technical capabilities, clear benefits of use, and even user preferences for using electronic systems for collecting primary data, paper-based data collection is still common in clinical research settings. However, with recent developments in both clinical research and tablet computer technology, the comparative advantages and disadvantages of data collection methods should be determined. Objective: To describe case studies using multiple methods of data collection, including next-generation tablets, and consider their various advantages and disadvantages. MATERIALS AND Methods: We reviewed 5 modern case studies using primary data collection, using methods ranging from paper to next-generation tablet computers. We performed semistructured telephone interviews with each project, which considered factors relevant to data collection. We address specific issues with workflow, implementation and security for these different methods, and identify differences in implementation that led to different technology considerations for each case study. Results and Discussion: There remain multiple methods for primary data collection, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Two recent methods are electronic health record templates and next-generation tablet computers. Electronic health record templates can link data directly to medical records, but are notably difficult to use. Current tablet computers are substantially different from previous technologies with regard to user familiarity and software cost. The use of cloud-based storage for tablet computers, however, creates a specific challenge for clinical research that must be considered but can be overcome.",
keywords = "Clinical research, IPad, Primary data collection, Tablet computers",
author = "Wilcox, {Adam B.} and Gallagher, {Kathleen D.} and Bernadette Boden-Albala and Bakken, {Suzanne R.}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c1e7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research data collection methods

T2 - From paper to tablet computers

AU - Wilcox, Adam B.

AU - Gallagher, Kathleen D.

AU - Boden-Albala, Bernadette

AU - Bakken, Suzanne R.

PY - 2012/7

Y1 - 2012/7

N2 - Background: Primary data collection is a critical activity in clinical research. Even with significant advances in technical capabilities, clear benefits of use, and even user preferences for using electronic systems for collecting primary data, paper-based data collection is still common in clinical research settings. However, with recent developments in both clinical research and tablet computer technology, the comparative advantages and disadvantages of data collection methods should be determined. Objective: To describe case studies using multiple methods of data collection, including next-generation tablets, and consider their various advantages and disadvantages. MATERIALS AND Methods: We reviewed 5 modern case studies using primary data collection, using methods ranging from paper to next-generation tablet computers. We performed semistructured telephone interviews with each project, which considered factors relevant to data collection. We address specific issues with workflow, implementation and security for these different methods, and identify differences in implementation that led to different technology considerations for each case study. Results and Discussion: There remain multiple methods for primary data collection, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Two recent methods are electronic health record templates and next-generation tablet computers. Electronic health record templates can link data directly to medical records, but are notably difficult to use. Current tablet computers are substantially different from previous technologies with regard to user familiarity and software cost. The use of cloud-based storage for tablet computers, however, creates a specific challenge for clinical research that must be considered but can be overcome.

AB - Background: Primary data collection is a critical activity in clinical research. Even with significant advances in technical capabilities, clear benefits of use, and even user preferences for using electronic systems for collecting primary data, paper-based data collection is still common in clinical research settings. However, with recent developments in both clinical research and tablet computer technology, the comparative advantages and disadvantages of data collection methods should be determined. Objective: To describe case studies using multiple methods of data collection, including next-generation tablets, and consider their various advantages and disadvantages. MATERIALS AND Methods: We reviewed 5 modern case studies using primary data collection, using methods ranging from paper to next-generation tablet computers. We performed semistructured telephone interviews with each project, which considered factors relevant to data collection. We address specific issues with workflow, implementation and security for these different methods, and identify differences in implementation that led to different technology considerations for each case study. Results and Discussion: There remain multiple methods for primary data collection, each with its own strengths and weaknesses. Two recent methods are electronic health record templates and next-generation tablet computers. Electronic health record templates can link data directly to medical records, but are notably difficult to use. Current tablet computers are substantially different from previous technologies with regard to user familiarity and software cost. The use of cloud-based storage for tablet computers, however, creates a specific challenge for clinical research that must be considered but can be overcome.

KW - Clinical research

KW - IPad

KW - Primary data collection

KW - Tablet computers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862281001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862281001&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c1e7

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c1e7

M3 - Article

VL - 50

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -