Reproductive and sexual health benefits in private health insurance plans in Washington State

A. Kurth, L. Bielinski, K. Graap, J. Conniff, F. A. Connell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carders in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)153-160+179
JournalFamily Planning Perspectives
Volume33
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

private health insurance
Reproductive Health
Preferred Provider Organizations
Insurance Benefits
Health Insurance
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Reproductive Health Services
Health Maintenance Organizations
Insurance
Contraception
Early Detection of Cancer
Pregnancy
Infertility
Major Medical Insurance
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
health
HIV
Private Sector
Privacy
Confidentiality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Kurth, A., Bielinski, L., Graap, K., Conniff, J., & Connell, F. A. (2001). Reproductive and sexual health benefits in private health insurance plans in Washington State. Family Planning Perspectives, 33(4), 153-160+179.

Reproductive and sexual health benefits in private health insurance plans in Washington State. / Kurth, A.; Bielinski, L.; Graap, K.; Conniff, J.; Connell, F. A.

In: Family Planning Perspectives, Vol. 33, No. 4, 2001, p. 153-160+179.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kurth, A, Bielinski, L, Graap, K, Conniff, J & Connell, FA 2001, 'Reproductive and sexual health benefits in private health insurance plans in Washington State', Family Planning Perspectives, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 153-160+179.
Kurth A, Bielinski L, Graap K, Conniff J, Connell FA. Reproductive and sexual health benefits in private health insurance plans in Washington State. Family Planning Perspectives. 2001;33(4):153-160+179.
Kurth, A. ; Bielinski, L. ; Graap, K. ; Conniff, J. ; Connell, F. A. / Reproductive and sexual health benefits in private health insurance plans in Washington State. In: Family Planning Perspectives. 2001 ; Vol. 33, No. 4. pp. 153-160+179.
@article{d873a0a57af94117a29559195e24d556,
title = "Reproductive and sexual health benefits in private health insurance plans in Washington State",
abstract = "Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carders in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. {"}Core{"} services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8{\%} were indemnity plans, 14{\%} were point-of-service plans, 21{\%} were preferred-provider organization plans and 57{\%} were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13{\%} of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19{\%} for maternity services, 75{\%} for contraception, 37{\%} for sterilization and 53{\%} for pregnancy termination; 98{\%} of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.",
author = "A. Kurth and L. Bielinski and K. Graap and J. Conniff and Connell, {F. A.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "153--160+179",
journal = "Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health",
issn = "1538-6341",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reproductive and sexual health benefits in private health insurance plans in Washington State

AU - Kurth, A.

AU - Bielinski, L.

AU - Graap, K.

AU - Conniff, J.

AU - Connell, F. A.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carders in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.

AB - Context: Although unintended pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) are considerable problems in the United States, private health insurance plans are inconsistent in their coverage of reproductive and sexual health services needed to address these problems. Methods: A survey administered to a market-representative sample of 12 health insurance carders in Washington State assessed benefit coverage for gynecologic services, maternity services, contraceptive services, pregnancy termination, infertility services, reproductive cancer screening, STD services, HIV and AIDS services, and sterilization, as well as for the existence of confidentiality policies. "Core" services in each category were defined based on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other recommendations. Results: Of the 91 top-selling plans on which data were collected, 8% were indemnity plans, 14% were point-of-service plans, 21% were preferred-provider organization plans and 57% were health maintenance organization (HMO)-type products; they had a combined enrollment of 1.4 million individuals. Coverage of core services varied widely by type of plan. While a high proportion of plans covered core gynecologic, maternity, reproductive cancer screening, STD and HIV and AIDS services, nearly half of plans did not cover any kind of contraceptive method. Approximately 13% of female enrollees did not have core coverage for gynecologic services, 19% for maternity services, 75% for contraception, 37% for sterilization and 53% for pregnancy termination; 98% of women and men were not covered for infertility treatment. Most carriers did not have specific policies for maintaining privacy of sensitive health information. Overall, benefit coverage was lower for indemnity, preferred-provider organization and HMO plans in Washington State than has previously been seen nationally. Conclusions: A sizable proportion of women and men in Washington State who rely on private-sector health insurance lack comprehensive coverage for key reproductive and sexual health services.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034918849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034918849&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 153-160+179

JO - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

JF - Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health

SN - 1538-6341

IS - 4

ER -