Representing versus generalizing: Two approaches to external validity and their implications for the study of prejudice

Hart Blanton, James Jaccard

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-105
Number of pages7
JournalPsychological Inquiry
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2008

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Representing versus generalizing : Two approaches to external validity and their implications for the study of prejudice. / Blanton, Hart; Jaccard, James.

In: Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 19, No. 2, 04.2008, p. 99-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{6079a8a06d234997b4b43da8ab95a9a7,
title = "Representing versus generalizing: Two approaches to external validity and their implications for the study of prejudice",
author = "Hart Blanton and James Jaccard",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/10478400802049811",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "99--105",
journal = "Psychological Inquiry",
issn = "1047-840X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Representing versus generalizing

T2 - Two approaches to external validity and their implications for the study of prejudice

AU - Blanton, Hart

AU - Jaccard, James

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48249133329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48249133329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10478400802049811

DO - 10.1080/10478400802049811

M3 - Review article

VL - 19

SP - 99

EP - 105

JO - Psychological Inquiry

JF - Psychological Inquiry

SN - 1047-840X

IS - 2

ER -