Repeated Measures Analysis of Means in Clinical Research

James Jaccard, Lee Ackerman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Assumptions for analyzing treatment means in repeated measures designs are noted. The traditional F test has been shown to have limitations, given violations of the assumption of sphericity. This assumption is probably infrequently satisfied in clinical applications. Analytic alternatives based on a three-step Geisser-Greenhouse approach are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)426-428
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Volume53
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1985

Fingerprint

Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Repeated Measures Analysis of Means in Clinical Research. / Jaccard, James; Ackerman, Lee.

In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 53, No. 3, 06.1985, p. 426-428.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6c448c95bd044306b17102eed7b7b93b,
title = "Repeated Measures Analysis of Means in Clinical Research",
abstract = "Assumptions for analyzing treatment means in repeated measures designs are noted. The traditional F test has been shown to have limitations, given violations of the assumption of sphericity. This assumption is probably infrequently satisfied in clinical applications. Analytic alternatives based on a three-step Geisser-Greenhouse approach are discussed.",
author = "James Jaccard and Lee Ackerman",
year = "1985",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.426",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "426--428",
journal = "Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology",
issn = "0022-006X",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Repeated Measures Analysis of Means in Clinical Research

AU - Jaccard, James

AU - Ackerman, Lee

PY - 1985/6

Y1 - 1985/6

N2 - Assumptions for analyzing treatment means in repeated measures designs are noted. The traditional F test has been shown to have limitations, given violations of the assumption of sphericity. This assumption is probably infrequently satisfied in clinical applications. Analytic alternatives based on a three-step Geisser-Greenhouse approach are discussed.

AB - Assumptions for analyzing treatment means in repeated measures designs are noted. The traditional F test has been shown to have limitations, given violations of the assumption of sphericity. This assumption is probably infrequently satisfied in clinical applications. Analytic alternatives based on a three-step Geisser-Greenhouse approach are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0001195420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0001195420&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.426

DO - 10.1037/0022-006X.53.3.426

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0001195420

VL - 53

SP - 426

EP - 428

JO - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

JF - Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

SN - 0022-006X

IS - 3

ER -