Reliability of stellar inclination estimated from asteroseismology: Analytical criteria, mock simulations, and Kepler data analysis

Shoya Kamiaka, Othman Benomar, Yasushi Suto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Advances in asteroseismology of solar-like stars now provide a unique method to estimate the stellar inclination i*. This enables to evaluate the spin-orbit angle of transiting planetary systems in a complementary fashion to the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect, a well-established method to estimate the projected spin-orbit angle ?. Although the asteroseismic method has been broadly applied to the Kepler data, its reliability is yet to be assessed intensively. In this work, we evaluate the accuracy of i* from asteroseismology of solar-like stars using 3000 simulated power spectra. We find that the low-signal-to-noise ratio of the power spectra induces a systematic underestimate (overestimate) bias for stars with high (low) inclinations. We derive analytical criteria for the reliable asteroseismic estimate, which indicates that reliable measurements are possible in the range of 20° ≲ i* ≲ 80° only for stars with high-signal-tonoise ratio. We also analyse and measure the stellar inclination of 94 Kepler main-sequence solar-like stars, among that 33 are planetary hosts. According to our reliability criteria, a third of them (nine with planets, 22 without) have accurate stellar inclination. Comparison of our asteroseismic estimate of vsin i* against spectroscopic measurements indicates that the latter suffers from a large uncertainty possibly due to the modelling of macroturbulence, especially for stars with projected rotation speed vsin i* ≲ 5 kms-1. This reinforces earlier claims, and the stellar inclination estimated from the combination of measurements from spectroscopy and photometric variation for slowly rotating stars needs to be interpreted with caution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)391-405
Number of pages15
JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Volume479
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

asteroseismology
inclination
stars
simulation
signal-to-noise ratio
estimates
planet
power spectra
spectroscopy
orbits
planetary systems
modeling
method
data analysis
planets
signal to noise ratios

Keywords

  • Asteroseismology
  • Methods: data analysis
  • Planetary systems
  • Stars: rotation
  • Techniques: photometric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Space and Planetary Science

Cite this

Reliability of stellar inclination estimated from asteroseismology : Analytical criteria, mock simulations, and Kepler data analysis. / Kamiaka, Shoya; Benomar, Othman; Suto, Yasushi.

In: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Vol. 479, No. 1, 01.09.2018, p. 391-405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f7483a58b0c741baa004edda1ee2077c,
title = "Reliability of stellar inclination estimated from asteroseismology: Analytical criteria, mock simulations, and Kepler data analysis",
abstract = "Advances in asteroseismology of solar-like stars now provide a unique method to estimate the stellar inclination i*. This enables to evaluate the spin-orbit angle of transiting planetary systems in a complementary fashion to the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect, a well-established method to estimate the projected spin-orbit angle ?. Although the asteroseismic method has been broadly applied to the Kepler data, its reliability is yet to be assessed intensively. In this work, we evaluate the accuracy of i* from asteroseismology of solar-like stars using 3000 simulated power spectra. We find that the low-signal-to-noise ratio of the power spectra induces a systematic underestimate (overestimate) bias for stars with high (low) inclinations. We derive analytical criteria for the reliable asteroseismic estimate, which indicates that reliable measurements are possible in the range of 20° ≲ i* ≲ 80° only for stars with high-signal-tonoise ratio. We also analyse and measure the stellar inclination of 94 Kepler main-sequence solar-like stars, among that 33 are planetary hosts. According to our reliability criteria, a third of them (nine with planets, 22 without) have accurate stellar inclination. Comparison of our asteroseismic estimate of vsin i* against spectroscopic measurements indicates that the latter suffers from a large uncertainty possibly due to the modelling of macroturbulence, especially for stars with projected rotation speed vsin i* ≲ 5 kms-1. This reinforces earlier claims, and the stellar inclination estimated from the combination of measurements from spectroscopy and photometric variation for slowly rotating stars needs to be interpreted with caution.",
keywords = "Asteroseismology, Methods: data analysis, Planetary systems, Stars: rotation, Techniques: photometric",
author = "Shoya Kamiaka and Othman Benomar and Yasushi Suto",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/mnras/sty1358",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "479",
pages = "391--405",
journal = "Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society",
issn = "0035-8711",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of stellar inclination estimated from asteroseismology

T2 - Analytical criteria, mock simulations, and Kepler data analysis

AU - Kamiaka, Shoya

AU - Benomar, Othman

AU - Suto, Yasushi

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Advances in asteroseismology of solar-like stars now provide a unique method to estimate the stellar inclination i*. This enables to evaluate the spin-orbit angle of transiting planetary systems in a complementary fashion to the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect, a well-established method to estimate the projected spin-orbit angle ?. Although the asteroseismic method has been broadly applied to the Kepler data, its reliability is yet to be assessed intensively. In this work, we evaluate the accuracy of i* from asteroseismology of solar-like stars using 3000 simulated power spectra. We find that the low-signal-to-noise ratio of the power spectra induces a systematic underestimate (overestimate) bias for stars with high (low) inclinations. We derive analytical criteria for the reliable asteroseismic estimate, which indicates that reliable measurements are possible in the range of 20° ≲ i* ≲ 80° only for stars with high-signal-tonoise ratio. We also analyse and measure the stellar inclination of 94 Kepler main-sequence solar-like stars, among that 33 are planetary hosts. According to our reliability criteria, a third of them (nine with planets, 22 without) have accurate stellar inclination. Comparison of our asteroseismic estimate of vsin i* against spectroscopic measurements indicates that the latter suffers from a large uncertainty possibly due to the modelling of macroturbulence, especially for stars with projected rotation speed vsin i* ≲ 5 kms-1. This reinforces earlier claims, and the stellar inclination estimated from the combination of measurements from spectroscopy and photometric variation for slowly rotating stars needs to be interpreted with caution.

AB - Advances in asteroseismology of solar-like stars now provide a unique method to estimate the stellar inclination i*. This enables to evaluate the spin-orbit angle of transiting planetary systems in a complementary fashion to the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect, a well-established method to estimate the projected spin-orbit angle ?. Although the asteroseismic method has been broadly applied to the Kepler data, its reliability is yet to be assessed intensively. In this work, we evaluate the accuracy of i* from asteroseismology of solar-like stars using 3000 simulated power spectra. We find that the low-signal-to-noise ratio of the power spectra induces a systematic underestimate (overestimate) bias for stars with high (low) inclinations. We derive analytical criteria for the reliable asteroseismic estimate, which indicates that reliable measurements are possible in the range of 20° ≲ i* ≲ 80° only for stars with high-signal-tonoise ratio. We also analyse and measure the stellar inclination of 94 Kepler main-sequence solar-like stars, among that 33 are planetary hosts. According to our reliability criteria, a third of them (nine with planets, 22 without) have accurate stellar inclination. Comparison of our asteroseismic estimate of vsin i* against spectroscopic measurements indicates that the latter suffers from a large uncertainty possibly due to the modelling of macroturbulence, especially for stars with projected rotation speed vsin i* ≲ 5 kms-1. This reinforces earlier claims, and the stellar inclination estimated from the combination of measurements from spectroscopy and photometric variation for slowly rotating stars needs to be interpreted with caution.

KW - Asteroseismology

KW - Methods: data analysis

KW - Planetary systems

KW - Stars: rotation

KW - Techniques: photometric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051553920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85051553920&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/mnras/sty1358

DO - 10.1093/mnras/sty1358

M3 - Article

VL - 479

SP - 391

EP - 405

JO - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

JF - Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

SN - 0035-8711

IS - 1

ER -