Reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings

L. Borgatta, Patrick Shrout, M. Y. Divon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The nonstress test is commonly used as a test of fetal well-being, despite the fact that both false-positive and false-negative results are known to occur. Although some of the errors are due to biologic variability among fetuses, some may be due to variability of reading the test. The purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings. Fifty nonstress test monitor strips were read by five perinatologists on two occasions, for a total of 500 readings. Nonstress tests were read as reactive, equivocal, nonreactive, or technically unsatisfactory. Of the 50 tracings, only 11 had identical readings on all 10 occasions, and readers had different readings for the first and second readings 28% of the time. Estimates of interobserver and intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.41 to 0.55. These results indicate that there is considerable interobserver and intraobserver variability that can be expected to have a serious adverse effect on the sensitivity of the nonstress test.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-558
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume159
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1988

Fingerprint

Reading
Observer Variation
Fetus

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings. / Borgatta, L.; Shrout, Patrick; Divon, M. Y.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 159, No. 3, 1988, p. 554-558.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2b1e090ebdb947a98170955cd4262668,
title = "Reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings",
abstract = "The nonstress test is commonly used as a test of fetal well-being, despite the fact that both false-positive and false-negative results are known to occur. Although some of the errors are due to biologic variability among fetuses, some may be due to variability of reading the test. The purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings. Fifty nonstress test monitor strips were read by five perinatologists on two occasions, for a total of 500 readings. Nonstress tests were read as reactive, equivocal, nonreactive, or technically unsatisfactory. Of the 50 tracings, only 11 had identical readings on all 10 occasions, and readers had different readings for the first and second readings 28{\%} of the time. Estimates of interobserver and intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.41 to 0.55. These results indicate that there is considerable interobserver and intraobserver variability that can be expected to have a serious adverse effect on the sensitivity of the nonstress test.",
author = "L. Borgatta and Patrick Shrout and Divon, {M. Y.}",
year = "1988",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "159",
pages = "554--558",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings

AU - Borgatta, L.

AU - Shrout, Patrick

AU - Divon, M. Y.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - The nonstress test is commonly used as a test of fetal well-being, despite the fact that both false-positive and false-negative results are known to occur. Although some of the errors are due to biologic variability among fetuses, some may be due to variability of reading the test. The purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings. Fifty nonstress test monitor strips were read by five perinatologists on two occasions, for a total of 500 readings. Nonstress tests were read as reactive, equivocal, nonreactive, or technically unsatisfactory. Of the 50 tracings, only 11 had identical readings on all 10 occasions, and readers had different readings for the first and second readings 28% of the time. Estimates of interobserver and intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.41 to 0.55. These results indicate that there is considerable interobserver and intraobserver variability that can be expected to have a serious adverse effect on the sensitivity of the nonstress test.

AB - The nonstress test is commonly used as a test of fetal well-being, despite the fact that both false-positive and false-negative results are known to occur. Although some of the errors are due to biologic variability among fetuses, some may be due to variability of reading the test. The purpose of the present study was to assess the reliability and reproducibility of nonstress test readings. Fifty nonstress test monitor strips were read by five perinatologists on two occasions, for a total of 500 readings. Nonstress tests were read as reactive, equivocal, nonreactive, or technically unsatisfactory. Of the 50 tracings, only 11 had identical readings on all 10 occasions, and readers had different readings for the first and second readings 28% of the time. Estimates of interobserver and intraobserver agreement ranged from 0.41 to 0.55. These results indicate that there is considerable interobserver and intraobserver variability that can be expected to have a serious adverse effect on the sensitivity of the nonstress test.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023735326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023735326&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3421253

AN - SCOPUS:0023735326

VL - 159

SP - 554

EP - 558

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 3

ER -