Relationships, instruction, understandings

One district’s implementation of rounds

Rachel Roegman, Thomas Hatch, Kathryn Hill, Victoria S. Kniewel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how instructional rounds contributes to shared understandings and facilitates the development of relationships among administrators. Design/methodology/approach – This mixed methods study draws on three years of data in a district engaged in rounds. Administrators annually completed a social network survey, which focussed on how often they interacted around instructional issues. Additionally, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of administrators. Findings – Administrators have increased their participation in and understanding of instructional rounds, as well as their understanding of district initiatives. However, results are mixed when looking at the quantitative data. While the theory of rounds suggests that the process would lead to increased interactions, the authors found a statistically significant decrease. Research limitations/implications – Implications include examining rounds as part of a district’s set of formal and informal structures. Also, results suggest further examination of how turnover impacts networks. Finally, expanding the number of interviews may present a more mixed qualitative experience of rounds. Practical implications – As districts adopt initiatives based on observations, rounds can be used to support administrators’ growth in understanding these initiatives. Simultaneously, districts need to consider the purpose for both central office and building administrators and how those purposes align with protocols, norms, and practices they use. Originality/value – This paper advances the empirical knowledge on instructional rounds, which has been gaining popularity, though little empirical analysis exists of the process, how its theory of action is enacted, and how administrators experience rounds.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)625-641
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Educational Administration
Volume53
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

district
instruction
informal structure
interview
turnover
popularity
social network
experience
examination
participation
methodology
interaction
Values

Keywords

  • Administrator relationships
  • Administrators
  • Communities of practice
  • Educational administration
  • Instruction
  • Instructional rounds
  • Shared understandings of instruction
  • Social network analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Relationships, instruction, understandings : One district’s implementation of rounds. / Roegman, Rachel; Hatch, Thomas; Hill, Kathryn; Kniewel, Victoria S.

In: Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 53, No. 5, 01.01.2015, p. 625-641.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roegman, Rachel ; Hatch, Thomas ; Hill, Kathryn ; Kniewel, Victoria S. / Relationships, instruction, understandings : One district’s implementation of rounds. In: Journal of Educational Administration. 2015 ; Vol. 53, No. 5. pp. 625-641.
@article{2c4b0dddcd744a9a8c8bd6bd18f4c2a4,
title = "Relationships, instruction, understandings: One district’s implementation of rounds",
abstract = "Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how instructional rounds contributes to shared understandings and facilitates the development of relationships among administrators. Design/methodology/approach – This mixed methods study draws on three years of data in a district engaged in rounds. Administrators annually completed a social network survey, which focussed on how often they interacted around instructional issues. Additionally, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of administrators. Findings – Administrators have increased their participation in and understanding of instructional rounds, as well as their understanding of district initiatives. However, results are mixed when looking at the quantitative data. While the theory of rounds suggests that the process would lead to increased interactions, the authors found a statistically significant decrease. Research limitations/implications – Implications include examining rounds as part of a district’s set of formal and informal structures. Also, results suggest further examination of how turnover impacts networks. Finally, expanding the number of interviews may present a more mixed qualitative experience of rounds. Practical implications – As districts adopt initiatives based on observations, rounds can be used to support administrators’ growth in understanding these initiatives. Simultaneously, districts need to consider the purpose for both central office and building administrators and how those purposes align with protocols, norms, and practices they use. Originality/value – This paper advances the empirical knowledge on instructional rounds, which has been gaining popularity, though little empirical analysis exists of the process, how its theory of action is enacted, and how administrators experience rounds.",
keywords = "Administrator relationships, Administrators, Communities of practice, Educational administration, Instruction, Instructional rounds, Shared understandings of instruction, Social network analysis",
author = "Rachel Roegman and Thomas Hatch and Kathryn Hill and Kniewel, {Victoria S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0078",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "625--641",
journal = "Journal of Educational Administration",
issn = "0957-8234",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationships, instruction, understandings

T2 - One district’s implementation of rounds

AU - Roegman, Rachel

AU - Hatch, Thomas

AU - Hill, Kathryn

AU - Kniewel, Victoria S.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how instructional rounds contributes to shared understandings and facilitates the development of relationships among administrators. Design/methodology/approach – This mixed methods study draws on three years of data in a district engaged in rounds. Administrators annually completed a social network survey, which focussed on how often they interacted around instructional issues. Additionally, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of administrators. Findings – Administrators have increased their participation in and understanding of instructional rounds, as well as their understanding of district initiatives. However, results are mixed when looking at the quantitative data. While the theory of rounds suggests that the process would lead to increased interactions, the authors found a statistically significant decrease. Research limitations/implications – Implications include examining rounds as part of a district’s set of formal and informal structures. Also, results suggest further examination of how turnover impacts networks. Finally, expanding the number of interviews may present a more mixed qualitative experience of rounds. Practical implications – As districts adopt initiatives based on observations, rounds can be used to support administrators’ growth in understanding these initiatives. Simultaneously, districts need to consider the purpose for both central office and building administrators and how those purposes align with protocols, norms, and practices they use. Originality/value – This paper advances the empirical knowledge on instructional rounds, which has been gaining popularity, though little empirical analysis exists of the process, how its theory of action is enacted, and how administrators experience rounds.

AB - Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how instructional rounds contributes to shared understandings and facilitates the development of relationships among administrators. Design/methodology/approach – This mixed methods study draws on three years of data in a district engaged in rounds. Administrators annually completed a social network survey, which focussed on how often they interacted around instructional issues. Additionally, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of administrators. Findings – Administrators have increased their participation in and understanding of instructional rounds, as well as their understanding of district initiatives. However, results are mixed when looking at the quantitative data. While the theory of rounds suggests that the process would lead to increased interactions, the authors found a statistically significant decrease. Research limitations/implications – Implications include examining rounds as part of a district’s set of formal and informal structures. Also, results suggest further examination of how turnover impacts networks. Finally, expanding the number of interviews may present a more mixed qualitative experience of rounds. Practical implications – As districts adopt initiatives based on observations, rounds can be used to support administrators’ growth in understanding these initiatives. Simultaneously, districts need to consider the purpose for both central office and building administrators and how those purposes align with protocols, norms, and practices they use. Originality/value – This paper advances the empirical knowledge on instructional rounds, which has been gaining popularity, though little empirical analysis exists of the process, how its theory of action is enacted, and how administrators experience rounds.

KW - Administrator relationships

KW - Administrators

KW - Communities of practice

KW - Educational administration

KW - Instruction

KW - Instructional rounds

KW - Shared understandings of instruction

KW - Social network analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84936992257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84936992257&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0078

DO - 10.1108/JEA-07-2014-0078

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 625

EP - 641

JO - Journal of Educational Administration

JF - Journal of Educational Administration

SN - 0957-8234

IS - 5

ER -