Rejoinder: Response to discussions and a look ahead

Vincent Dorie, Jennifer Hill, Uri Shalit, Marc Scott, Dan Cervone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Response to discussion of Dorie (2017), in which the authors of that piece express their gratitude to the discussants, rebut some specific criticisms, and argue that the limitations of the 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Competition represent an exciting opportunity for future competitions in a similar mold.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-99
Number of pages6
JournalStatistical Science
Volume34
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

Causal Inference
Look-ahead
Express
Criticism
Causal inference

Keywords

  • Automated algorithms
  • Causal inference
  • Competition
  • Evaluation
  • Machine learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Mathematics(all)
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty

Cite this

Rejoinder : Response to discussions and a look ahead. / Dorie, Vincent; Hill, Jennifer; Shalit, Uri; Scott, Marc; Cervone, Dan.

In: Statistical Science, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.02.2019, p. 94-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dorie, Vincent ; Hill, Jennifer ; Shalit, Uri ; Scott, Marc ; Cervone, Dan. / Rejoinder : Response to discussions and a look ahead. In: Statistical Science. 2019 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 94-99.
@article{eb32aae39e984b3f893999994ca25a92,
title = "Rejoinder: Response to discussions and a look ahead",
abstract = "Response to discussion of Dorie (2017), in which the authors of that piece express their gratitude to the discussants, rebut some specific criticisms, and argue that the limitations of the 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Competition represent an exciting opportunity for future competitions in a similar mold.",
keywords = "Automated algorithms, Causal inference, Competition, Evaluation, Machine learning",
author = "Vincent Dorie and Jennifer Hill and Uri Shalit and Marc Scott and Dan Cervone",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1214/18-STS688",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "94--99",
journal = "Statistical Science",
issn = "0883-4237",
publisher = "Institute of Mathematical Statistics",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rejoinder

T2 - Response to discussions and a look ahead

AU - Dorie, Vincent

AU - Hill, Jennifer

AU - Shalit, Uri

AU - Scott, Marc

AU - Cervone, Dan

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Response to discussion of Dorie (2017), in which the authors of that piece express their gratitude to the discussants, rebut some specific criticisms, and argue that the limitations of the 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Competition represent an exciting opportunity for future competitions in a similar mold.

AB - Response to discussion of Dorie (2017), in which the authors of that piece express their gratitude to the discussants, rebut some specific criticisms, and argue that the limitations of the 2016 Atlantic Causal Inference Competition represent an exciting opportunity for future competitions in a similar mold.

KW - Automated algorithms

KW - Causal inference

KW - Competition

KW - Evaluation

KW - Machine learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065477675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065477675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1214/18-STS688

DO - 10.1214/18-STS688

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85065477675

VL - 34

SP - 94

EP - 99

JO - Statistical Science

JF - Statistical Science

SN - 0883-4237

IS - 1

ER -