Reimplantation of Dental Implants following Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis

A Pilot Study in Dogs

Liran Levin, Hadar Zigdon, Paulo Coelho, Marcelo Suzuki, Eli E. Machtei

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives: This preliminary investigation aimed to evaluate the potential of contaminated implants to reosseointegrate into pristine sites and, in addition, to assess the potential of osseointegration of new implants in peri-implantitis sockets in a canine model. Methods: All mandibular premolars were bilaterally extracted from two mongrel dogs. Following 12 weeks of healing, two dental implants were inserted on each hemiarch. Forty-five days following implant placement, a silk ligature secured with cyanoacrylate was placed around the implants' cervical region in order to induce peri-implantitis. After another 45 days from ligature placement, the implants were mechanically removed using counter rotation with a ratchet and were reimplanted without any decontamination (neither rinsing nor chemical or mechanical cleaning) in adjacent pristine zones. In sites where implants were removed, new, wider-diameter implants were placed in the infected sockets. Forty-five days following reimplantation surgery, the dogs were sacrificed; nondecalcified specimens were processed and toluidine blue stained for morphologic and morphometric (bone-to-implant contact [BIC]) assessment under an optical microscope. In dog 1 all the implants (both in the pristine and in the infected sites) survived and osseointegrated while in dog 2, six out of eight implants failed to osseointegrate and exfoliated. Overall, the mean BIC of all implants was 51.08% (SD 20.54). The mean BIC for the infected implants placed into pristine sites was 51.48%±26.29% (SD) and the mean BIC for the new implants in peri-implantitis socket was 50.58%±14.27% (SD). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this preliminary investigation, especially the small number of animals, osseointegration seems to be achievable both in infected sites and around contaminated implant surfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-6
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Peri-Implantitis
Dental Implants
Replantation
Ligation
Dogs
Osseointegration
Bone and Bones
Cyanoacrylates
Tolonium Chloride
Silk
Decontamination
Bicuspid
Canidae

Keywords

  • Bone loss
  • Implant failure
  • Implant success
  • Local infection
  • Peri-implant mucositis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)
  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

Reimplantation of Dental Implants following Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis : A Pilot Study in Dogs. / Levin, Liran; Zigdon, Hadar; Coelho, Paulo; Suzuki, Marcelo; Machtei, Eli E.

In: Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, Vol. 15, No. 1, 02.2013, p. 1-6.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1ddf8552558143d6b066d4e29d870b54,
title = "Reimplantation of Dental Implants following Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis: A Pilot Study in Dogs",
abstract = "Objectives: This preliminary investigation aimed to evaluate the potential of contaminated implants to reosseointegrate into pristine sites and, in addition, to assess the potential of osseointegration of new implants in peri-implantitis sockets in a canine model. Methods: All mandibular premolars were bilaterally extracted from two mongrel dogs. Following 12 weeks of healing, two dental implants were inserted on each hemiarch. Forty-five days following implant placement, a silk ligature secured with cyanoacrylate was placed around the implants' cervical region in order to induce peri-implantitis. After another 45 days from ligature placement, the implants were mechanically removed using counter rotation with a ratchet and were reimplanted without any decontamination (neither rinsing nor chemical or mechanical cleaning) in adjacent pristine zones. In sites where implants were removed, new, wider-diameter implants were placed in the infected sockets. Forty-five days following reimplantation surgery, the dogs were sacrificed; nondecalcified specimens were processed and toluidine blue stained for morphologic and morphometric (bone-to-implant contact [BIC]) assessment under an optical microscope. In dog 1 all the implants (both in the pristine and in the infected sites) survived and osseointegrated while in dog 2, six out of eight implants failed to osseointegrate and exfoliated. Overall, the mean BIC of all implants was 51.08{\%} (SD 20.54). The mean BIC for the infected implants placed into pristine sites was 51.48{\%}±26.29{\%} (SD) and the mean BIC for the new implants in peri-implantitis socket was 50.58{\%}±14.27{\%} (SD). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this preliminary investigation, especially the small number of animals, osseointegration seems to be achievable both in infected sites and around contaminated implant surfaces.",
keywords = "Bone loss, Implant failure, Implant success, Local infection, Peri-implant mucositis",
author = "Liran Levin and Hadar Zigdon and Paulo Coelho and Marcelo Suzuki and Machtei, {Eli E.}",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00371.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "1--6",
journal = "Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research",
issn = "1523-0899",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reimplantation of Dental Implants following Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis

T2 - A Pilot Study in Dogs

AU - Levin, Liran

AU - Zigdon, Hadar

AU - Coelho, Paulo

AU - Suzuki, Marcelo

AU - Machtei, Eli E.

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Objectives: This preliminary investigation aimed to evaluate the potential of contaminated implants to reosseointegrate into pristine sites and, in addition, to assess the potential of osseointegration of new implants in peri-implantitis sockets in a canine model. Methods: All mandibular premolars were bilaterally extracted from two mongrel dogs. Following 12 weeks of healing, two dental implants were inserted on each hemiarch. Forty-five days following implant placement, a silk ligature secured with cyanoacrylate was placed around the implants' cervical region in order to induce peri-implantitis. After another 45 days from ligature placement, the implants were mechanically removed using counter rotation with a ratchet and were reimplanted without any decontamination (neither rinsing nor chemical or mechanical cleaning) in adjacent pristine zones. In sites where implants were removed, new, wider-diameter implants were placed in the infected sockets. Forty-five days following reimplantation surgery, the dogs were sacrificed; nondecalcified specimens were processed and toluidine blue stained for morphologic and morphometric (bone-to-implant contact [BIC]) assessment under an optical microscope. In dog 1 all the implants (both in the pristine and in the infected sites) survived and osseointegrated while in dog 2, six out of eight implants failed to osseointegrate and exfoliated. Overall, the mean BIC of all implants was 51.08% (SD 20.54). The mean BIC for the infected implants placed into pristine sites was 51.48%±26.29% (SD) and the mean BIC for the new implants in peri-implantitis socket was 50.58%±14.27% (SD). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this preliminary investigation, especially the small number of animals, osseointegration seems to be achievable both in infected sites and around contaminated implant surfaces.

AB - Objectives: This preliminary investigation aimed to evaluate the potential of contaminated implants to reosseointegrate into pristine sites and, in addition, to assess the potential of osseointegration of new implants in peri-implantitis sockets in a canine model. Methods: All mandibular premolars were bilaterally extracted from two mongrel dogs. Following 12 weeks of healing, two dental implants were inserted on each hemiarch. Forty-five days following implant placement, a silk ligature secured with cyanoacrylate was placed around the implants' cervical region in order to induce peri-implantitis. After another 45 days from ligature placement, the implants were mechanically removed using counter rotation with a ratchet and were reimplanted without any decontamination (neither rinsing nor chemical or mechanical cleaning) in adjacent pristine zones. In sites where implants were removed, new, wider-diameter implants were placed in the infected sockets. Forty-five days following reimplantation surgery, the dogs were sacrificed; nondecalcified specimens were processed and toluidine blue stained for morphologic and morphometric (bone-to-implant contact [BIC]) assessment under an optical microscope. In dog 1 all the implants (both in the pristine and in the infected sites) survived and osseointegrated while in dog 2, six out of eight implants failed to osseointegrate and exfoliated. Overall, the mean BIC of all implants was 51.08% (SD 20.54). The mean BIC for the infected implants placed into pristine sites was 51.48%±26.29% (SD) and the mean BIC for the new implants in peri-implantitis socket was 50.58%±14.27% (SD). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this preliminary investigation, especially the small number of animals, osseointegration seems to be achievable both in infected sites and around contaminated implant surfaces.

KW - Bone loss

KW - Implant failure

KW - Implant success

KW - Local infection

KW - Peri-implant mucositis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84873055302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84873055302&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00371.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00371.x

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 1

EP - 6

JO - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

JF - Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research

SN - 1523-0899

IS - 1

ER -