Regulating self-defensiveness

If-then plans prevent claiming and creating performance handicaps

J. Lukas Thürmer, Sean M. McCrea, Peter M. Gollwitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Claiming or creating obstacles before performing important tasks (i.e., self-handicapping) is a costly strategy to protect the self from implications of poor outcomes. We predicted that forming an if-then plan (implementation intention) helps individuals overcome their performance-related worries and thus prevents self-handicapping behavior. In two experiments, all participants formed the goal to perform well on an upcoming task and learned the strategies to ignore worries and tell themselves "I can do it", either in an if-then format (implementation intention) or not (control). The task was either described as an intelligence test (highly threatening) or as a perception style test (less threatening). Participants could then claim a self-handicap (report stress, Experiment 1) or behaviorally self-handicap (inadequately prepare, Experiment 2). As predicted, implementation intentions reduced claimed and behavioral self-handicapping to levels observed in the low-threat control conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated these effects among chronic self-handicappers. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)712-725
Number of pages14
JournalMotivation and Emotion
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2013

Fingerprint

Intelligence Tests
Ego
Self Report

Keywords

  • Implementation intentions
  • Self-defensiveness
  • Self-handicapping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Regulating self-defensiveness : If-then plans prevent claiming and creating performance handicaps. / Thürmer, J. Lukas; McCrea, Sean M.; Gollwitzer, Peter M.

In: Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 37, No. 4, 12.2013, p. 712-725.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d55b2e66324a464fb74af3823c0008d6,
title = "Regulating self-defensiveness: If-then plans prevent claiming and creating performance handicaps",
abstract = "Claiming or creating obstacles before performing important tasks (i.e., self-handicapping) is a costly strategy to protect the self from implications of poor outcomes. We predicted that forming an if-then plan (implementation intention) helps individuals overcome their performance-related worries and thus prevents self-handicapping behavior. In two experiments, all participants formed the goal to perform well on an upcoming task and learned the strategies to ignore worries and tell themselves {"}I can do it{"}, either in an if-then format (implementation intention) or not (control). The task was either described as an intelligence test (highly threatening) or as a perception style test (less threatening). Participants could then claim a self-handicap (report stress, Experiment 1) or behaviorally self-handicap (inadequately prepare, Experiment 2). As predicted, implementation intentions reduced claimed and behavioral self-handicapping to levels observed in the low-threat control conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated these effects among chronic self-handicappers. Implications of these findings are discussed.",
keywords = "Implementation intentions, Self-defensiveness, Self-handicapping",
author = "Th{\"u}rmer, {J. Lukas} and McCrea, {Sean M.} and Gollwitzer, {Peter M.}",
year = "2013",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s11031-013-9352-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "712--725",
journal = "Motivation and Emotion",
issn = "0146-7239",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulating self-defensiveness

T2 - If-then plans prevent claiming and creating performance handicaps

AU - Thürmer, J. Lukas

AU - McCrea, Sean M.

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter M.

PY - 2013/12

Y1 - 2013/12

N2 - Claiming or creating obstacles before performing important tasks (i.e., self-handicapping) is a costly strategy to protect the self from implications of poor outcomes. We predicted that forming an if-then plan (implementation intention) helps individuals overcome their performance-related worries and thus prevents self-handicapping behavior. In two experiments, all participants formed the goal to perform well on an upcoming task and learned the strategies to ignore worries and tell themselves "I can do it", either in an if-then format (implementation intention) or not (control). The task was either described as an intelligence test (highly threatening) or as a perception style test (less threatening). Participants could then claim a self-handicap (report stress, Experiment 1) or behaviorally self-handicap (inadequately prepare, Experiment 2). As predicted, implementation intentions reduced claimed and behavioral self-handicapping to levels observed in the low-threat control conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated these effects among chronic self-handicappers. Implications of these findings are discussed.

AB - Claiming or creating obstacles before performing important tasks (i.e., self-handicapping) is a costly strategy to protect the self from implications of poor outcomes. We predicted that forming an if-then plan (implementation intention) helps individuals overcome their performance-related worries and thus prevents self-handicapping behavior. In two experiments, all participants formed the goal to perform well on an upcoming task and learned the strategies to ignore worries and tell themselves "I can do it", either in an if-then format (implementation intention) or not (control). The task was either described as an intelligence test (highly threatening) or as a perception style test (less threatening). Participants could then claim a self-handicap (report stress, Experiment 1) or behaviorally self-handicap (inadequately prepare, Experiment 2). As predicted, implementation intentions reduced claimed and behavioral self-handicapping to levels observed in the low-threat control conditions. Experiment 2 demonstrated these effects among chronic self-handicappers. Implications of these findings are discussed.

KW - Implementation intentions

KW - Self-defensiveness

KW - Self-handicapping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888001080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888001080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11031-013-9352-7

DO - 10.1007/s11031-013-9352-7

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 712

EP - 725

JO - Motivation and Emotion

JF - Motivation and Emotion

SN - 0146-7239

IS - 4

ER -