Reframing child rights to effect policy change

Sally Cohen, Eileen Fry-Bowers, Sandra Bishop-Josef, Moira K. O'Neill, Kristi Westphaln

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Much of the discourse surrounding children's advocacy in the United States relies on a rights-based approach. We argue that this approach has limitations that impede progress in advancing children's well-being. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explain alternatives to a rights-based approach in advocating for children, such as developmental, economic, capabilities, and mutualism frameworks. Methods: Our analysis is based on the independent work of two separate university-based groups studying children's rights; the authors were each members of one of the groups and subsequently integrated their findings for this article. Discussion: US policies for children, especially in the domains of health and education, depict an unevenness that results in many children failing to receive certain critical services and benefits. Relying on a rights-based approach to correct these disparities and inequities is contentious and has yet to sufficiently change state and federal policies or improve children's health outcomes. Other approaches are needed to advance children's well-being. Conclusion: Nurses individually and collectively need to be mindful of the pitfalls of a rights-based approach and use other frameworks in advocating for children and youth.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalNursing outlook
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Child Welfare
Child Advocacy
Symbiosis
Health Education
Nurses
Economics
Child Health

Keywords

  • Advocacy
  • Children
  • Developmental
  • Economic
  • Mutualism
  • Policy
  • Rights

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Cohen, S., Fry-Bowers, E., Bishop-Josef, S., O'Neill, M. K., & Westphaln, K. (2019). Reframing child rights to effect policy change. Nursing outlook. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.012

Reframing child rights to effect policy change. / Cohen, Sally; Fry-Bowers, Eileen; Bishop-Josef, Sandra; O'Neill, Moira K.; Westphaln, Kristi.

In: Nursing outlook, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohen, Sally ; Fry-Bowers, Eileen ; Bishop-Josef, Sandra ; O'Neill, Moira K. ; Westphaln, Kristi. / Reframing child rights to effect policy change. In: Nursing outlook. 2019.
@article{198d9777dac34806a193649a09624d3f,
title = "Reframing child rights to effect policy change",
abstract = "Background: Much of the discourse surrounding children's advocacy in the United States relies on a rights-based approach. We argue that this approach has limitations that impede progress in advancing children's well-being. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explain alternatives to a rights-based approach in advocating for children, such as developmental, economic, capabilities, and mutualism frameworks. Methods: Our analysis is based on the independent work of two separate university-based groups studying children's rights; the authors were each members of one of the groups and subsequently integrated their findings for this article. Discussion: US policies for children, especially in the domains of health and education, depict an unevenness that results in many children failing to receive certain critical services and benefits. Relying on a rights-based approach to correct these disparities and inequities is contentious and has yet to sufficiently change state and federal policies or improve children's health outcomes. Other approaches are needed to advance children's well-being. Conclusion: Nurses individually and collectively need to be mindful of the pitfalls of a rights-based approach and use other frameworks in advocating for children and youth.",
keywords = "Advocacy, Children, Developmental, Economic, Mutualism, Policy, Rights",
author = "Sally Cohen and Eileen Fry-Bowers and Sandra Bishop-Josef and O'Neill, {Moira K.} and Kristi Westphaln",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.012",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Nursing Outlook",
issn = "0029-6554",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reframing child rights to effect policy change

AU - Cohen, Sally

AU - Fry-Bowers, Eileen

AU - Bishop-Josef, Sandra

AU - O'Neill, Moira K.

AU - Westphaln, Kristi

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Much of the discourse surrounding children's advocacy in the United States relies on a rights-based approach. We argue that this approach has limitations that impede progress in advancing children's well-being. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explain alternatives to a rights-based approach in advocating for children, such as developmental, economic, capabilities, and mutualism frameworks. Methods: Our analysis is based on the independent work of two separate university-based groups studying children's rights; the authors were each members of one of the groups and subsequently integrated their findings for this article. Discussion: US policies for children, especially in the domains of health and education, depict an unevenness that results in many children failing to receive certain critical services and benefits. Relying on a rights-based approach to correct these disparities and inequities is contentious and has yet to sufficiently change state and federal policies or improve children's health outcomes. Other approaches are needed to advance children's well-being. Conclusion: Nurses individually and collectively need to be mindful of the pitfalls of a rights-based approach and use other frameworks in advocating for children and youth.

AB - Background: Much of the discourse surrounding children's advocacy in the United States relies on a rights-based approach. We argue that this approach has limitations that impede progress in advancing children's well-being. Purpose: The purpose of this article is to explain alternatives to a rights-based approach in advocating for children, such as developmental, economic, capabilities, and mutualism frameworks. Methods: Our analysis is based on the independent work of two separate university-based groups studying children's rights; the authors were each members of one of the groups and subsequently integrated their findings for this article. Discussion: US policies for children, especially in the domains of health and education, depict an unevenness that results in many children failing to receive certain critical services and benefits. Relying on a rights-based approach to correct these disparities and inequities is contentious and has yet to sufficiently change state and federal policies or improve children's health outcomes. Other approaches are needed to advance children's well-being. Conclusion: Nurses individually and collectively need to be mindful of the pitfalls of a rights-based approach and use other frameworks in advocating for children and youth.

KW - Advocacy

KW - Children

KW - Developmental

KW - Economic

KW - Mutualism

KW - Policy

KW - Rights

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064511060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064511060&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.012

DO - 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.02.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 31023475

AN - SCOPUS:85064511060

JO - Nursing Outlook

JF - Nursing Outlook

SN - 0029-6554

ER -