Reflective and reflexive action control in patients with frontal brain lesions

Angelika Lengfelder, Peter Gollwitzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Two types of action control derived from the model of action phases (H. Heckhausen & P. M. Gollwitzer, 1987) were analyzed in patients with frontal lesions, patients with nonfrontal lesions, and university students. In Study 1, reflective action control in terms of goal selection was assessed, and impaired deliberation was found in patients with frontal lesions. Study 2 assessed reflexive action control in terms of automatic action initiation as a result of forming implementation intentions (P. M. Gollwitzer, 1999). All participants sped up their responses to critical stimuli by forming implementation intentions. Moreover, lesion patients with weak performances on the Tower of Hanoi (TOH) task did worse than patients with strong TOH performances in Study 1 but better than control participants in Study 2. Findings are interpreted as a functional dissociation between conscious reflective action control and automatic reflexive action control.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-100
Number of pages21
JournalNeuropsychology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001

Fingerprint

Brain
Students

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

Reflective and reflexive action control in patients with frontal brain lesions. / Lengfelder, Angelika; Gollwitzer, Peter.

In: Neuropsychology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2001, p. 80-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{99d40a8bfcad4743a8e32a76659b87c4,
title = "Reflective and reflexive action control in patients with frontal brain lesions",
abstract = "Two types of action control derived from the model of action phases (H. Heckhausen & P. M. Gollwitzer, 1987) were analyzed in patients with frontal lesions, patients with nonfrontal lesions, and university students. In Study 1, reflective action control in terms of goal selection was assessed, and impaired deliberation was found in patients with frontal lesions. Study 2 assessed reflexive action control in terms of automatic action initiation as a result of forming implementation intentions (P. M. Gollwitzer, 1999). All participants sped up their responses to critical stimuli by forming implementation intentions. Moreover, lesion patients with weak performances on the Tower of Hanoi (TOH) task did worse than patients with strong TOH performances in Study 1 but better than control participants in Study 2. Findings are interpreted as a functional dissociation between conscious reflective action control and automatic reflexive action control.",
author = "Angelika Lengfelder and Peter Gollwitzer",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1037//0894-4105.15.1.80",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "80--100",
journal = "Neuropsychology",
issn = "0894-4105",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflective and reflexive action control in patients with frontal brain lesions

AU - Lengfelder, Angelika

AU - Gollwitzer, Peter

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Two types of action control derived from the model of action phases (H. Heckhausen & P. M. Gollwitzer, 1987) were analyzed in patients with frontal lesions, patients with nonfrontal lesions, and university students. In Study 1, reflective action control in terms of goal selection was assessed, and impaired deliberation was found in patients with frontal lesions. Study 2 assessed reflexive action control in terms of automatic action initiation as a result of forming implementation intentions (P. M. Gollwitzer, 1999). All participants sped up their responses to critical stimuli by forming implementation intentions. Moreover, lesion patients with weak performances on the Tower of Hanoi (TOH) task did worse than patients with strong TOH performances in Study 1 but better than control participants in Study 2. Findings are interpreted as a functional dissociation between conscious reflective action control and automatic reflexive action control.

AB - Two types of action control derived from the model of action phases (H. Heckhausen & P. M. Gollwitzer, 1987) were analyzed in patients with frontal lesions, patients with nonfrontal lesions, and university students. In Study 1, reflective action control in terms of goal selection was assessed, and impaired deliberation was found in patients with frontal lesions. Study 2 assessed reflexive action control in terms of automatic action initiation as a result of forming implementation intentions (P. M. Gollwitzer, 1999). All participants sped up their responses to critical stimuli by forming implementation intentions. Moreover, lesion patients with weak performances on the Tower of Hanoi (TOH) task did worse than patients with strong TOH performances in Study 1 but better than control participants in Study 2. Findings are interpreted as a functional dissociation between conscious reflective action control and automatic reflexive action control.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035146847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035146847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037//0894-4105.15.1.80

DO - 10.1037//0894-4105.15.1.80

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 80

EP - 100

JO - Neuropsychology

JF - Neuropsychology

SN - 0894-4105

IS - 1

ER -