Reevaluating the self-medication hypothesis among the dually diagnosed

Benjamin Henwood, Deborah K. Padgett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The self-medication hypothesis (SMH) is an intuitively appealing explanation for substance use. Conceptually, however, it is not always clear what the hypothesis entails, particularly when applied to persons with mental and substance use disorders. This makes empirical support for SMH difficult to evaluate. By classifying the self-reported reasons for substance use from 33 participants in a NIMH-funded qualitative study of dual diagnosis and homelessness, this study aims to evaluate the applicability of SMH. How one conceptualizes SMH will determine whether SMH is empirically supported. When SMH refers to using substances strictly to cope with symptoms of mental disorders, only 11 out of 72 attributions support it. When SMH refers to using substances to cope with painful feelings in general, more than half of all attributions support SMH. The significance of accurately understanding the various reasons people give for why they use substances is discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)160-165
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal on Addictions
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2007

Fingerprint

Self Medication
Dual (Psychiatry) Diagnosis
National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.)
Homeless Persons
Mental Disorders
Substance-Related Disorders
Emotions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Reevaluating the self-medication hypothesis among the dually diagnosed. / Henwood, Benjamin; Padgett, Deborah K.

In: American Journal on Addictions, Vol. 16, No. 3, 05.2007, p. 160-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{4d0db00c9ff2477ba2251fafdc5ee3f8,
title = "Reevaluating the self-medication hypothesis among the dually diagnosed",
abstract = "The self-medication hypothesis (SMH) is an intuitively appealing explanation for substance use. Conceptually, however, it is not always clear what the hypothesis entails, particularly when applied to persons with mental and substance use disorders. This makes empirical support for SMH difficult to evaluate. By classifying the self-reported reasons for substance use from 33 participants in a NIMH-funded qualitative study of dual diagnosis and homelessness, this study aims to evaluate the applicability of SMH. How one conceptualizes SMH will determine whether SMH is empirically supported. When SMH refers to using substances strictly to cope with symptoms of mental disorders, only 11 out of 72 attributions support it. When SMH refers to using substances to cope with painful feelings in general, more than half of all attributions support SMH. The significance of accurately understanding the various reasons people give for why they use substances is discussed.",
author = "Benjamin Henwood and Padgett, {Deborah K.}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1080/10550490701375368",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "160--165",
journal = "American Journal on Addictions",
issn = "1055-0496",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reevaluating the self-medication hypothesis among the dually diagnosed

AU - Henwood, Benjamin

AU - Padgett, Deborah K.

PY - 2007/5

Y1 - 2007/5

N2 - The self-medication hypothesis (SMH) is an intuitively appealing explanation for substance use. Conceptually, however, it is not always clear what the hypothesis entails, particularly when applied to persons with mental and substance use disorders. This makes empirical support for SMH difficult to evaluate. By classifying the self-reported reasons for substance use from 33 participants in a NIMH-funded qualitative study of dual diagnosis and homelessness, this study aims to evaluate the applicability of SMH. How one conceptualizes SMH will determine whether SMH is empirically supported. When SMH refers to using substances strictly to cope with symptoms of mental disorders, only 11 out of 72 attributions support it. When SMH refers to using substances to cope with painful feelings in general, more than half of all attributions support SMH. The significance of accurately understanding the various reasons people give for why they use substances is discussed.

AB - The self-medication hypothesis (SMH) is an intuitively appealing explanation for substance use. Conceptually, however, it is not always clear what the hypothesis entails, particularly when applied to persons with mental and substance use disorders. This makes empirical support for SMH difficult to evaluate. By classifying the self-reported reasons for substance use from 33 participants in a NIMH-funded qualitative study of dual diagnosis and homelessness, this study aims to evaluate the applicability of SMH. How one conceptualizes SMH will determine whether SMH is empirically supported. When SMH refers to using substances strictly to cope with symptoms of mental disorders, only 11 out of 72 attributions support it. When SMH refers to using substances to cope with painful feelings in general, more than half of all attributions support SMH. The significance of accurately understanding the various reasons people give for why they use substances is discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347373033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34347373033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10550490701375368

DO - 10.1080/10550490701375368

M3 - Article

C2 - 17612818

AN - SCOPUS:34347373033

VL - 16

SP - 160

EP - 165

JO - American Journal on Addictions

JF - American Journal on Addictions

SN - 1055-0496

IS - 3

ER -