Recent findings on liquefaction triggering in clean and silty sands during earthquakes

R. Dobry, Tarek Abdoun

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    This is the written version of the H. Bolton Seed Medal Award Lecture presented at the ASCE Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress in Phoenix, Arizona, February 14-17, 2016. It discusses five recent findings on liquefaction triggering of clean and silty sands during earthquakes. Tools ranging from case history analysis to centrifuge tests were used in the corresponding studies. The findings are (1) pore pressure ratio during earthquakes is more uniquely correlated to cyclic shear strain, γc, than to cyclic stress ratio (CSR); (2) current penetration and shear wave velocity (Vs) charts are associated with small to moderate cyclic strains triggering liquefaction, γcl, that range from γcl ≈ 0.03% to γcl ≈ 0.3% depending on soil characteristics and earthquake magnitude; (3) for recent uncompacted clean and silty sand fills that have not been significantly preshaken, such as those in the San Francisco Bay Area of California, and a Richter scale magnitude Mw = 7.5, triggering occurs at γcl ≈ 0.03%; (4) for the heavily preshaken, geologically recent natural silty sands in the Imperial Valley of California, γcl ≈ 0.1-0.2% with a liquefaction resistance that is twice as big despite the fact that some of these sands were deposited as recently as the uncompacted fills in San Francisco; and (5) the static cone penetration resistance (CPT) tip penetration resistance of a clean sand is more sensitive to preshaking than Vs, with the CPT capturing better the increased liquefaction resistance due to preshaking.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Article number04017077
    JournalJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering
    Volume143
    Issue number10
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 1 2017

    Fingerprint

    Liquefaction
    liquefaction
    Earthquakes
    Sand
    earthquake
    penetration
    sand
    Cones
    Geotechnical engineering
    Shear waves
    Pore pressure
    Shear strain
    Centrifuges
    shear strain
    earthquake magnitude
    centrifuge
    Structural design
    pore pressure
    wave velocity
    Seed

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Environmental Science(all)
    • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

    Cite this

    Recent findings on liquefaction triggering in clean and silty sands during earthquakes. / Dobry, R.; Abdoun, Tarek.

    In: Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 143, No. 10, 04017077, 01.10.2017.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{6d0a9e6d01a943c6a72ebbe2bea7fe89,
    title = "Recent findings on liquefaction triggering in clean and silty sands during earthquakes",
    abstract = "This is the written version of the H. Bolton Seed Medal Award Lecture presented at the ASCE Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress in Phoenix, Arizona, February 14-17, 2016. It discusses five recent findings on liquefaction triggering of clean and silty sands during earthquakes. Tools ranging from case history analysis to centrifuge tests were used in the corresponding studies. The findings are (1) pore pressure ratio during earthquakes is more uniquely correlated to cyclic shear strain, γc, than to cyclic stress ratio (CSR); (2) current penetration and shear wave velocity (Vs) charts are associated with small to moderate cyclic strains triggering liquefaction, γcl, that range from γcl ≈ 0.03{\%} to γcl ≈ 0.3{\%} depending on soil characteristics and earthquake magnitude; (3) for recent uncompacted clean and silty sand fills that have not been significantly preshaken, such as those in the San Francisco Bay Area of California, and a Richter scale magnitude Mw = 7.5, triggering occurs at γcl ≈ 0.03{\%}; (4) for the heavily preshaken, geologically recent natural silty sands in the Imperial Valley of California, γcl ≈ 0.1-0.2{\%} with a liquefaction resistance that is twice as big despite the fact that some of these sands were deposited as recently as the uncompacted fills in San Francisco; and (5) the static cone penetration resistance (CPT) tip penetration resistance of a clean sand is more sensitive to preshaking than Vs, with the CPT capturing better the increased liquefaction resistance due to preshaking.",
    author = "R. Dobry and Tarek Abdoun",
    year = "2017",
    month = "10",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001778",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "143",
    journal = "Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE",
    issn = "1090-0241",
    publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
    number = "10",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Recent findings on liquefaction triggering in clean and silty sands during earthquakes

    AU - Dobry, R.

    AU - Abdoun, Tarek

    PY - 2017/10/1

    Y1 - 2017/10/1

    N2 - This is the written version of the H. Bolton Seed Medal Award Lecture presented at the ASCE Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress in Phoenix, Arizona, February 14-17, 2016. It discusses five recent findings on liquefaction triggering of clean and silty sands during earthquakes. Tools ranging from case history analysis to centrifuge tests were used in the corresponding studies. The findings are (1) pore pressure ratio during earthquakes is more uniquely correlated to cyclic shear strain, γc, than to cyclic stress ratio (CSR); (2) current penetration and shear wave velocity (Vs) charts are associated with small to moderate cyclic strains triggering liquefaction, γcl, that range from γcl ≈ 0.03% to γcl ≈ 0.3% depending on soil characteristics and earthquake magnitude; (3) for recent uncompacted clean and silty sand fills that have not been significantly preshaken, such as those in the San Francisco Bay Area of California, and a Richter scale magnitude Mw = 7.5, triggering occurs at γcl ≈ 0.03%; (4) for the heavily preshaken, geologically recent natural silty sands in the Imperial Valley of California, γcl ≈ 0.1-0.2% with a liquefaction resistance that is twice as big despite the fact that some of these sands were deposited as recently as the uncompacted fills in San Francisco; and (5) the static cone penetration resistance (CPT) tip penetration resistance of a clean sand is more sensitive to preshaking than Vs, with the CPT capturing better the increased liquefaction resistance due to preshaking.

    AB - This is the written version of the H. Bolton Seed Medal Award Lecture presented at the ASCE Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Congress in Phoenix, Arizona, February 14-17, 2016. It discusses five recent findings on liquefaction triggering of clean and silty sands during earthquakes. Tools ranging from case history analysis to centrifuge tests were used in the corresponding studies. The findings are (1) pore pressure ratio during earthquakes is more uniquely correlated to cyclic shear strain, γc, than to cyclic stress ratio (CSR); (2) current penetration and shear wave velocity (Vs) charts are associated with small to moderate cyclic strains triggering liquefaction, γcl, that range from γcl ≈ 0.03% to γcl ≈ 0.3% depending on soil characteristics and earthquake magnitude; (3) for recent uncompacted clean and silty sand fills that have not been significantly preshaken, such as those in the San Francisco Bay Area of California, and a Richter scale magnitude Mw = 7.5, triggering occurs at γcl ≈ 0.03%; (4) for the heavily preshaken, geologically recent natural silty sands in the Imperial Valley of California, γcl ≈ 0.1-0.2% with a liquefaction resistance that is twice as big despite the fact that some of these sands were deposited as recently as the uncompacted fills in San Francisco; and (5) the static cone penetration resistance (CPT) tip penetration resistance of a clean sand is more sensitive to preshaking than Vs, with the CPT capturing better the increased liquefaction resistance due to preshaking.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026762891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026762891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001778

    DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001778

    M3 - Article

    VL - 143

    JO - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE

    JF - Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering - ASCE

    SN - 1090-0241

    IS - 10

    M1 - 04017077

    ER -