Reactions to discrimination in an incentive pay compensation scheme: A game-theoretic approach

Keith Weigelt, Janet Dukerich, Andrew Schotter

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    In a series of experiments with undergraduate business students, some behavioral consequences of discrimination in an incentive compensation scheme were investigated. A game-theoretic approach was used to predict the choices subjects should make if they attempted to maximize monetary outcomes. Subjects, who were assigned to either an advantaged or disadvantaged condition, participated in an experiment in which they earned money based on their chosen decisions. The decision choices of the advantaged and disadvantaged groups were then compared to the predicted choices from the game-theory model. The results supported the predictions from the theory of tournaments only in the symmetric tournament, where there was no discrimination. When discrimination was introduced into the experiment, the observed choices of both advantaged and disadvantaged subjects were significantly greater than that predicted by the theory.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)26-44
    Number of pages19
    JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
    Volume44
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    StatePublished - 1989

    Fingerprint

    Vulnerable Populations
    Motivation
    Game Theory
    Students
    Discrimination
    Experiment
    Incentive pay
    Tournament

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
    • Strategy and Management
    • Psychology(all)
    • Applied Psychology

    Cite this

    Reactions to discrimination in an incentive pay compensation scheme : A game-theoretic approach. / Weigelt, Keith; Dukerich, Janet; Schotter, Andrew.

    In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 44, No. 1, 1989, p. 26-44.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{815c558678b643199e2db72d8946ee35,
    title = "Reactions to discrimination in an incentive pay compensation scheme: A game-theoretic approach",
    abstract = "In a series of experiments with undergraduate business students, some behavioral consequences of discrimination in an incentive compensation scheme were investigated. A game-theoretic approach was used to predict the choices subjects should make if they attempted to maximize monetary outcomes. Subjects, who were assigned to either an advantaged or disadvantaged condition, participated in an experiment in which they earned money based on their chosen decisions. The decision choices of the advantaged and disadvantaged groups were then compared to the predicted choices from the game-theory model. The results supported the predictions from the theory of tournaments only in the symmetric tournament, where there was no discrimination. When discrimination was introduced into the experiment, the observed choices of both advantaged and disadvantaged subjects were significantly greater than that predicted by the theory.",
    author = "Keith Weigelt and Janet Dukerich and Andrew Schotter",
    year = "1989",
    doi = "10.1016/0749-5978(89)90033-2",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "44",
    pages = "26--44",
    journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
    issn = "0749-5978",
    publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Reactions to discrimination in an incentive pay compensation scheme

    T2 - A game-theoretic approach

    AU - Weigelt, Keith

    AU - Dukerich, Janet

    AU - Schotter, Andrew

    PY - 1989

    Y1 - 1989

    N2 - In a series of experiments with undergraduate business students, some behavioral consequences of discrimination in an incentive compensation scheme were investigated. A game-theoretic approach was used to predict the choices subjects should make if they attempted to maximize monetary outcomes. Subjects, who were assigned to either an advantaged or disadvantaged condition, participated in an experiment in which they earned money based on their chosen decisions. The decision choices of the advantaged and disadvantaged groups were then compared to the predicted choices from the game-theory model. The results supported the predictions from the theory of tournaments only in the symmetric tournament, where there was no discrimination. When discrimination was introduced into the experiment, the observed choices of both advantaged and disadvantaged subjects were significantly greater than that predicted by the theory.

    AB - In a series of experiments with undergraduate business students, some behavioral consequences of discrimination in an incentive compensation scheme were investigated. A game-theoretic approach was used to predict the choices subjects should make if they attempted to maximize monetary outcomes. Subjects, who were assigned to either an advantaged or disadvantaged condition, participated in an experiment in which they earned money based on their chosen decisions. The decision choices of the advantaged and disadvantaged groups were then compared to the predicted choices from the game-theory model. The results supported the predictions from the theory of tournaments only in the symmetric tournament, where there was no discrimination. When discrimination was introduced into the experiment, the observed choices of both advantaged and disadvantaged subjects were significantly greater than that predicted by the theory.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38249005079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38249005079&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90033-2

    DO - 10.1016/0749-5978(89)90033-2

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:38249005079

    VL - 44

    SP - 26

    EP - 44

    JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

    JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

    SN - 0749-5978

    IS - 1

    ER -