'Rational use' in Antarctic waters

Jennifer Jacquet, Eli Blood-Patterson, Cassandra Brooks, David Ainley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CAMLR Convention) is the legal doctrine presiding over the exploitation of marine life in the Southern Ocean. At recent Commission (CCAMLR) meetings, some member states have interpreted the term 'rational use' in the Convention text as 'the unrestricted right to fish' and, most recently, the term has been evoked in opposition to the establishment of marine protected areas. Tensions over interpretation of the term at CCAMLR are tracked and presented. The term's meaning and original intent are also explored in the publicly available record of treaty negotiations. According to negotiation documents as well as the CAMLR Convention, the term 'rational use' does not imply an unconditional right to exploit marine life in the Southern Ocean. Like 'scientific uncertainty,' which has also been evoked in ways that reflect social values, 'rational use' should be seen as a value-laden term, rather than as an explicit mandate to fish.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)28-34
    Number of pages7
    JournalMarine Policy
    Volume63
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

    Fingerprint

    oceans
    treaties
    water
    social benefit
    fish
    conservation areas
    uncertainty
    ocean
    treaty
    doctrine
    protected area
    Values
    exploitation
    opposition
    conservation
    interpretation
    convention
    Water
    resources
    Fish

    Keywords

    • Antarctica
    • CCAMLR
    • Ecosystem based fishery management
    • Fisheries
    • International environmental law
    • Marine protected areas
    • Rational use
    • Southern Ocean

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Aquatic Science
    • Economics and Econometrics
    • Environmental Science(all)
    • Law
    • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

    Cite this

    Jacquet, J., Blood-Patterson, E., Brooks, C., & Ainley, D. (2016). 'Rational use' in Antarctic waters. Marine Policy, 63, 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.031

    'Rational use' in Antarctic waters. / Jacquet, Jennifer; Blood-Patterson, Eli; Brooks, Cassandra; Ainley, David.

    In: Marine Policy, Vol. 63, 01.01.2016, p. 28-34.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Jacquet, J, Blood-Patterson, E, Brooks, C & Ainley, D 2016, ''Rational use' in Antarctic waters', Marine Policy, vol. 63, pp. 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.031
    Jacquet J, Blood-Patterson E, Brooks C, Ainley D. 'Rational use' in Antarctic waters. Marine Policy. 2016 Jan 1;63:28-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.031
    Jacquet, Jennifer ; Blood-Patterson, Eli ; Brooks, Cassandra ; Ainley, David. / 'Rational use' in Antarctic waters. In: Marine Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 63. pp. 28-34.
    @article{b6496ef4ad574ede8960609b2cbb95b1,
    title = "'Rational use' in Antarctic waters",
    abstract = "The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CAMLR Convention) is the legal doctrine presiding over the exploitation of marine life in the Southern Ocean. At recent Commission (CCAMLR) meetings, some member states have interpreted the term 'rational use' in the Convention text as 'the unrestricted right to fish' and, most recently, the term has been evoked in opposition to the establishment of marine protected areas. Tensions over interpretation of the term at CCAMLR are tracked and presented. The term's meaning and original intent are also explored in the publicly available record of treaty negotiations. According to negotiation documents as well as the CAMLR Convention, the term 'rational use' does not imply an unconditional right to exploit marine life in the Southern Ocean. Like 'scientific uncertainty,' which has also been evoked in ways that reflect social values, 'rational use' should be seen as a value-laden term, rather than as an explicit mandate to fish.",
    keywords = "Antarctica, CCAMLR, Ecosystem based fishery management, Fisheries, International environmental law, Marine protected areas, Rational use, Southern Ocean",
    author = "Jennifer Jacquet and Eli Blood-Patterson and Cassandra Brooks and David Ainley",
    year = "2016",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.031",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "63",
    pages = "28--34",
    journal = "Marine Policy",
    issn = "0308-597X",
    publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - 'Rational use' in Antarctic waters

    AU - Jacquet, Jennifer

    AU - Blood-Patterson, Eli

    AU - Brooks, Cassandra

    AU - Ainley, David

    PY - 2016/1/1

    Y1 - 2016/1/1

    N2 - The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CAMLR Convention) is the legal doctrine presiding over the exploitation of marine life in the Southern Ocean. At recent Commission (CCAMLR) meetings, some member states have interpreted the term 'rational use' in the Convention text as 'the unrestricted right to fish' and, most recently, the term has been evoked in opposition to the establishment of marine protected areas. Tensions over interpretation of the term at CCAMLR are tracked and presented. The term's meaning and original intent are also explored in the publicly available record of treaty negotiations. According to negotiation documents as well as the CAMLR Convention, the term 'rational use' does not imply an unconditional right to exploit marine life in the Southern Ocean. Like 'scientific uncertainty,' which has also been evoked in ways that reflect social values, 'rational use' should be seen as a value-laden term, rather than as an explicit mandate to fish.

    AB - The Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CAMLR Convention) is the legal doctrine presiding over the exploitation of marine life in the Southern Ocean. At recent Commission (CCAMLR) meetings, some member states have interpreted the term 'rational use' in the Convention text as 'the unrestricted right to fish' and, most recently, the term has been evoked in opposition to the establishment of marine protected areas. Tensions over interpretation of the term at CCAMLR are tracked and presented. The term's meaning and original intent are also explored in the publicly available record of treaty negotiations. According to negotiation documents as well as the CAMLR Convention, the term 'rational use' does not imply an unconditional right to exploit marine life in the Southern Ocean. Like 'scientific uncertainty,' which has also been evoked in ways that reflect social values, 'rational use' should be seen as a value-laden term, rather than as an explicit mandate to fish.

    KW - Antarctica

    KW - CCAMLR

    KW - Ecosystem based fishery management

    KW - Fisheries

    KW - International environmental law

    KW - Marine protected areas

    KW - Rational use

    KW - Southern Ocean

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943611482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943611482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.031

    DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.09.031

    M3 - Article

    VL - 63

    SP - 28

    EP - 34

    JO - Marine Policy

    JF - Marine Policy

    SN - 0308-597X

    ER -