Rational inattention, optimal consideration sets, and stochastic choice

Andrew Caplin, Mark Dean, John Leahy

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    We unite two basic approaches to modelling limited attention in choice by showing that the rational inattention model implies the formation of consideration sets—only a subset of the available alternatives will be considered for choice. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for rationally inattentive behaviour which allow the identification of consideration sets. In simple settings, chosen options are those that are best on a stand-alone basis. In richer settings, the consideration set can only be identified holistically. In addition to payoffs, prior beliefs impact consideration sets. Linear inequalities identify all priors consistent with each possible consideration set.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)1061-1094
    Number of pages34
    JournalReview of Economic Studies
    Volume86
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

    Fingerprint

    Consideration sets
    Rational inattention
    Stochastic choice
    Modeling
    Limited attention

    Keywords

    • Consideration
    • Limited attention
    • Sets
    • Shannon Mutual Information

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Cite this

    Rational inattention, optimal consideration sets, and stochastic choice. / Caplin, Andrew; Dean, Mark; Leahy, John.

    In: Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 86, No. 3, 01.01.2019, p. 1061-1094.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Caplin, Andrew ; Dean, Mark ; Leahy, John. / Rational inattention, optimal consideration sets, and stochastic choice. In: Review of Economic Studies. 2019 ; Vol. 86, No. 3. pp. 1061-1094.
    @article{b7a1e9783005490f8a3d23f4be9caa74,
    title = "Rational inattention, optimal consideration sets, and stochastic choice",
    abstract = "We unite two basic approaches to modelling limited attention in choice by showing that the rational inattention model implies the formation of consideration sets—only a subset of the available alternatives will be considered for choice. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for rationally inattentive behaviour which allow the identification of consideration sets. In simple settings, chosen options are those that are best on a stand-alone basis. In richer settings, the consideration set can only be identified holistically. In addition to payoffs, prior beliefs impact consideration sets. Linear inequalities identify all priors consistent with each possible consideration set.",
    keywords = "Consideration, Limited attention, Sets, Shannon Mutual Information",
    author = "Andrew Caplin and Mark Dean and John Leahy",
    year = "2019",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1093/restud/rdy037",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "86",
    pages = "1061--1094",
    journal = "Review of Economic Studies",
    issn = "0034-6527",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Rational inattention, optimal consideration sets, and stochastic choice

    AU - Caplin, Andrew

    AU - Dean, Mark

    AU - Leahy, John

    PY - 2019/1/1

    Y1 - 2019/1/1

    N2 - We unite two basic approaches to modelling limited attention in choice by showing that the rational inattention model implies the formation of consideration sets—only a subset of the available alternatives will be considered for choice. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for rationally inattentive behaviour which allow the identification of consideration sets. In simple settings, chosen options are those that are best on a stand-alone basis. In richer settings, the consideration set can only be identified holistically. In addition to payoffs, prior beliefs impact consideration sets. Linear inequalities identify all priors consistent with each possible consideration set.

    AB - We unite two basic approaches to modelling limited attention in choice by showing that the rational inattention model implies the formation of consideration sets—only a subset of the available alternatives will be considered for choice. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for rationally inattentive behaviour which allow the identification of consideration sets. In simple settings, chosen options are those that are best on a stand-alone basis. In richer settings, the consideration set can only be identified holistically. In addition to payoffs, prior beliefs impact consideration sets. Linear inequalities identify all priors consistent with each possible consideration set.

    KW - Consideration

    KW - Limited attention

    KW - Sets

    KW - Shannon Mutual Information

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068443518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068443518&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/restud/rdy037

    DO - 10.1093/restud/rdy037

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 86

    SP - 1061

    EP - 1094

    JO - Review of Economic Studies

    JF - Review of Economic Studies

    SN - 0034-6527

    IS - 3

    ER -