Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments

Amy M. Belfi, Anna Kasdan, Jess Rowland, Edward A. Vessel, G. Gabrielle Starr, David Poeppel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gating paradigm. In a series of experiments, participants heard excerpts of classical, jazz, and electronica music. Excerpts were of different durations (250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, 1,000 ms, 2,000 ms, 10,000 ms) or note values (eighth note, quarter note, half note, dotted-half note, whole note, and entire 10,000 ms excerpt). After each excerpt, participants rated how much they liked the excerpt on a 9-point Likert scale. In Experiment 1, listeners made accurate aesthetic judgments within 750 ms for classical and jazz pieces, while electronic pieces were judged within 500 ms. When translated into note values (Experiment 2), electronica and jazz clips were judged more quickly than classical. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the familiarity of the musical excerpts. Unfamiliar clips were judged more quickly (500 ms) than familiar clips (750 ms), but there was overall higher accuracy for familiar pieces. Finally, we investigated listeners' aesthetic judgments continuously over the time course of more naturalistic (60 s) excerpts: Within 3 s, listeners' judgments differed between most- and least-liked pieces. We suggest that such rapid aesthetic judgments represent initial gut-level decisions that are made quickly, but that even these initial judgments are influenced by characteristics such as genre and familiarity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1531-1543
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: General
Volume147
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Esthetics
Surgical Instruments
Psychological Models
Music
Recognition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Familiarity
  • Genre
  • Liking
  • Music
  • Timing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Psychology(all)
  • Developmental Neuroscience

Cite this

Belfi, A. M., Kasdan, A., Rowland, J., Vessel, E. A., Gabrielle Starr, G., & Poeppel, D. (2018). Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(10), 1531-1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000474

Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments. / Belfi, Amy M.; Kasdan, Anna; Rowland, Jess; Vessel, Edward A.; Gabrielle Starr, G.; Poeppel, David.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, Vol. 147, No. 10, 01.10.2018, p. 1531-1543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Belfi, AM, Kasdan, A, Rowland, J, Vessel, EA, Gabrielle Starr, G & Poeppel, D 2018, 'Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments', Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, vol. 147, no. 10, pp. 1531-1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000474
Belfi AM, Kasdan A, Rowland J, Vessel EA, Gabrielle Starr G, Poeppel D. Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2018 Oct 1;147(10):1531-1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000474
Belfi, Amy M. ; Kasdan, Anna ; Rowland, Jess ; Vessel, Edward A. ; Gabrielle Starr, G. ; Poeppel, David. / Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2018 ; Vol. 147, No. 10. pp. 1531-1543.
@article{c4225b09dcc44bc499ec73e78adf1410,
title = "Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments",
abstract = "In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gating paradigm. In a series of experiments, participants heard excerpts of classical, jazz, and electronica music. Excerpts were of different durations (250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, 1,000 ms, 2,000 ms, 10,000 ms) or note values (eighth note, quarter note, half note, dotted-half note, whole note, and entire 10,000 ms excerpt). After each excerpt, participants rated how much they liked the excerpt on a 9-point Likert scale. In Experiment 1, listeners made accurate aesthetic judgments within 750 ms for classical and jazz pieces, while electronic pieces were judged within 500 ms. When translated into note values (Experiment 2), electronica and jazz clips were judged more quickly than classical. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the familiarity of the musical excerpts. Unfamiliar clips were judged more quickly (500 ms) than familiar clips (750 ms), but there was overall higher accuracy for familiar pieces. Finally, we investigated listeners' aesthetic judgments continuously over the time course of more naturalistic (60 s) excerpts: Within 3 s, listeners' judgments differed between most- and least-liked pieces. We suggest that such rapid aesthetic judgments represent initial gut-level decisions that are made quickly, but that even these initial judgments are influenced by characteristics such as genre and familiarity.",
keywords = "Familiarity, Genre, Liking, Music, Timing",
author = "Belfi, {Amy M.} and Anna Kasdan and Jess Rowland and Vessel, {Edward A.} and {Gabrielle Starr}, G. and David Poeppel",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/xge0000474",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "147",
pages = "1531--1543",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: General",
issn = "0096-3445",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rapid timing of musical aesthetic judgments

AU - Belfi, Amy M.

AU - Kasdan, Anna

AU - Rowland, Jess

AU - Vessel, Edward A.

AU - Gabrielle Starr, G.

AU - Poeppel, David

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gating paradigm. In a series of experiments, participants heard excerpts of classical, jazz, and electronica music. Excerpts were of different durations (250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, 1,000 ms, 2,000 ms, 10,000 ms) or note values (eighth note, quarter note, half note, dotted-half note, whole note, and entire 10,000 ms excerpt). After each excerpt, participants rated how much they liked the excerpt on a 9-point Likert scale. In Experiment 1, listeners made accurate aesthetic judgments within 750 ms for classical and jazz pieces, while electronic pieces were judged within 500 ms. When translated into note values (Experiment 2), electronica and jazz clips were judged more quickly than classical. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the familiarity of the musical excerpts. Unfamiliar clips were judged more quickly (500 ms) than familiar clips (750 ms), but there was overall higher accuracy for familiar pieces. Finally, we investigated listeners' aesthetic judgments continuously over the time course of more naturalistic (60 s) excerpts: Within 3 s, listeners' judgments differed between most- and least-liked pieces. We suggest that such rapid aesthetic judgments represent initial gut-level decisions that are made quickly, but that even these initial judgments are influenced by characteristics such as genre and familiarity.

AB - In recent years, psychological models of perception have undergone reevaluation due to a broadening of focus toward understanding not only how observers perceive stimuli but also how they subjectively evaluate stimuli. Here, we investigated the time course of such aesthetic evaluations using a gating paradigm. In a series of experiments, participants heard excerpts of classical, jazz, and electronica music. Excerpts were of different durations (250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, 1,000 ms, 2,000 ms, 10,000 ms) or note values (eighth note, quarter note, half note, dotted-half note, whole note, and entire 10,000 ms excerpt). After each excerpt, participants rated how much they liked the excerpt on a 9-point Likert scale. In Experiment 1, listeners made accurate aesthetic judgments within 750 ms for classical and jazz pieces, while electronic pieces were judged within 500 ms. When translated into note values (Experiment 2), electronica and jazz clips were judged more quickly than classical. In Experiment 3, we manipulated the familiarity of the musical excerpts. Unfamiliar clips were judged more quickly (500 ms) than familiar clips (750 ms), but there was overall higher accuracy for familiar pieces. Finally, we investigated listeners' aesthetic judgments continuously over the time course of more naturalistic (60 s) excerpts: Within 3 s, listeners' judgments differed between most- and least-liked pieces. We suggest that such rapid aesthetic judgments represent initial gut-level decisions that are made quickly, but that even these initial judgments are influenced by characteristics such as genre and familiarity.

KW - Familiarity

KW - Genre

KW - Liking

KW - Music

KW - Timing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049851309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049851309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/xge0000474

DO - 10.1037/xge0000474

M3 - Article

C2 - 30010370

AN - SCOPUS:85049851309

VL - 147

SP - 1531

EP - 1543

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General

SN - 0096-3445

IS - 10

ER -