Rapid assessment and response studies of injection drug use: Knowledge gain, capacity building, and intervention development in a multisite study

Gerry V. Stimson, Chris Fitch, Don Des Jarlais, Vladimir Poznyak, Theresa Perlis, Edna Oppenheimer, Tim Rhodes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives. We evaluated the World Health Organization's rapid assessment and response (RAR) method of assessing injection drug use and its associated health problems, focusing on knowledge gain, capacity building, and whether RAR leads to the development of interventions reducing the health effects of injection drug use, Methods. Data were derived from RAR studies conducted in Beijing, China; Bogota, Colombia; Greater Rosario, Argentina; Hanoi, Vietnam; Kharkiv, Ukraine; Minsk, Belarus; Nairobi, Kenya; Penang, Malaysia; St. Petersburg, Russia; and Tehran, Iran. Results. Substantial gains in knowledge and response capacity were reported at all of the study sites. Before RAR initiation, prevention and intervention programs had been absent or inadequate at most of the sites. The RARs resulted in many new or modified interventions; 7 sites reported 24 health-related interventions that were subsequently developed and influenced by the RARs. Conclusions. RARs, which require relatively little external funding, appear to be effective in linking assessment to development of appropriate interventions. The present results add to the evidence that rapid assessment is an important public health tool.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-295
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Public Health
Volume96
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2006

Fingerprint

Capacity Building
Injections
Health
Republic of Belarus
Pharmaceutical Preparations
Ukraine
Colombia
Vietnam
Kenya
Russia
Malaysia
Argentina
Iran
China
Public Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Rapid assessment and response studies of injection drug use : Knowledge gain, capacity building, and intervention development in a multisite study. / Stimson, Gerry V.; Fitch, Chris; Des Jarlais, Don; Poznyak, Vladimir; Perlis, Theresa; Oppenheimer, Edna; Rhodes, Tim.

In: American Journal of Public Health, Vol. 96, No. 2, 01.02.2006, p. 288-295.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stimson, Gerry V. ; Fitch, Chris ; Des Jarlais, Don ; Poznyak, Vladimir ; Perlis, Theresa ; Oppenheimer, Edna ; Rhodes, Tim. / Rapid assessment and response studies of injection drug use : Knowledge gain, capacity building, and intervention development in a multisite study. In: American Journal of Public Health. 2006 ; Vol. 96, No. 2. pp. 288-295.
@article{d173e8e39cb7421aa348b78830acba19,
title = "Rapid assessment and response studies of injection drug use: Knowledge gain, capacity building, and intervention development in a multisite study",
abstract = "Objectives. We evaluated the World Health Organization's rapid assessment and response (RAR) method of assessing injection drug use and its associated health problems, focusing on knowledge gain, capacity building, and whether RAR leads to the development of interventions reducing the health effects of injection drug use, Methods. Data were derived from RAR studies conducted in Beijing, China; Bogota, Colombia; Greater Rosario, Argentina; Hanoi, Vietnam; Kharkiv, Ukraine; Minsk, Belarus; Nairobi, Kenya; Penang, Malaysia; St. Petersburg, Russia; and Tehran, Iran. Results. Substantial gains in knowledge and response capacity were reported at all of the study sites. Before RAR initiation, prevention and intervention programs had been absent or inadequate at most of the sites. The RARs resulted in many new or modified interventions; 7 sites reported 24 health-related interventions that were subsequently developed and influenced by the RARs. Conclusions. RARs, which require relatively little external funding, appear to be effective in linking assessment to development of appropriate interventions. The present results add to the evidence that rapid assessment is an important public health tool.",
author = "Stimson, {Gerry V.} and Chris Fitch and {Des Jarlais}, Don and Vladimir Poznyak and Theresa Perlis and Edna Oppenheimer and Tim Rhodes",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2105/AJPH.2003.035899",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "288--295",
journal = "American Journal of Public Health",
issn = "0090-0036",
publisher = "American Public Health Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rapid assessment and response studies of injection drug use

T2 - Knowledge gain, capacity building, and intervention development in a multisite study

AU - Stimson, Gerry V.

AU - Fitch, Chris

AU - Des Jarlais, Don

AU - Poznyak, Vladimir

AU - Perlis, Theresa

AU - Oppenheimer, Edna

AU - Rhodes, Tim

PY - 2006/2/1

Y1 - 2006/2/1

N2 - Objectives. We evaluated the World Health Organization's rapid assessment and response (RAR) method of assessing injection drug use and its associated health problems, focusing on knowledge gain, capacity building, and whether RAR leads to the development of interventions reducing the health effects of injection drug use, Methods. Data were derived from RAR studies conducted in Beijing, China; Bogota, Colombia; Greater Rosario, Argentina; Hanoi, Vietnam; Kharkiv, Ukraine; Minsk, Belarus; Nairobi, Kenya; Penang, Malaysia; St. Petersburg, Russia; and Tehran, Iran. Results. Substantial gains in knowledge and response capacity were reported at all of the study sites. Before RAR initiation, prevention and intervention programs had been absent or inadequate at most of the sites. The RARs resulted in many new or modified interventions; 7 sites reported 24 health-related interventions that were subsequently developed and influenced by the RARs. Conclusions. RARs, which require relatively little external funding, appear to be effective in linking assessment to development of appropriate interventions. The present results add to the evidence that rapid assessment is an important public health tool.

AB - Objectives. We evaluated the World Health Organization's rapid assessment and response (RAR) method of assessing injection drug use and its associated health problems, focusing on knowledge gain, capacity building, and whether RAR leads to the development of interventions reducing the health effects of injection drug use, Methods. Data were derived from RAR studies conducted in Beijing, China; Bogota, Colombia; Greater Rosario, Argentina; Hanoi, Vietnam; Kharkiv, Ukraine; Minsk, Belarus; Nairobi, Kenya; Penang, Malaysia; St. Petersburg, Russia; and Tehran, Iran. Results. Substantial gains in knowledge and response capacity were reported at all of the study sites. Before RAR initiation, prevention and intervention programs had been absent or inadequate at most of the sites. The RARs resulted in many new or modified interventions; 7 sites reported 24 health-related interventions that were subsequently developed and influenced by the RARs. Conclusions. RARs, which require relatively little external funding, appear to be effective in linking assessment to development of appropriate interventions. The present results add to the evidence that rapid assessment is an important public health tool.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=31544440680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=31544440680&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2105/AJPH.2003.035899

DO - 10.2105/AJPH.2003.035899

M3 - Article

C2 - 16380578

AN - SCOPUS:31544440680

VL - 96

SP - 288

EP - 295

JO - American Journal of Public Health

JF - American Journal of Public Health

SN - 0090-0036

IS - 2

ER -