Random coefficient models for time-series-cross-section data

Monte Carlo experiments

Nathaniel Beck, Jonathan N. Katz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article considers random coefficient models (RCMs) for time-series-cross-section data. These models allow for unit to unit variation in the model parameters. The heart of the article compares the finite sample properties of the fully pooled estimator, the unit by unit (unpooled) estimator, and the (maximum likelihood) RCM estimator. The maximum likelihood estimator RCM performs well, even where the data were generated so that the RCM would be problematic. In an appendix, we show that the most common feasible generalized least squares estimator of the RCM models is always inferior to the maximum likelihood estimator, and in smaller samples dramatically so.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)182-195
Number of pages14
JournalPolitical Analysis
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

time series
experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Random coefficient models for time-series-cross-section data : Monte Carlo experiments. / Beck, Nathaniel; Katz, Jonathan N.

In: Political Analysis, Vol. 15, No. 2, 03.2007, p. 182-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{be7287f287504f5d950faa73bdbf8304,
title = "Random coefficient models for time-series-cross-section data: Monte Carlo experiments",
abstract = "This article considers random coefficient models (RCMs) for time-series-cross-section data. These models allow for unit to unit variation in the model parameters. The heart of the article compares the finite sample properties of the fully pooled estimator, the unit by unit (unpooled) estimator, and the (maximum likelihood) RCM estimator. The maximum likelihood estimator RCM performs well, even where the data were generated so that the RCM would be problematic. In an appendix, we show that the most common feasible generalized least squares estimator of the RCM models is always inferior to the maximum likelihood estimator, and in smaller samples dramatically so.",
author = "Nathaniel Beck and Katz, {Jonathan N.}",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1093/pan/mpl001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "182--195",
journal = "Political Analysis",
issn = "1047-1987",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Random coefficient models for time-series-cross-section data

T2 - Monte Carlo experiments

AU - Beck, Nathaniel

AU - Katz, Jonathan N.

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - This article considers random coefficient models (RCMs) for time-series-cross-section data. These models allow for unit to unit variation in the model parameters. The heart of the article compares the finite sample properties of the fully pooled estimator, the unit by unit (unpooled) estimator, and the (maximum likelihood) RCM estimator. The maximum likelihood estimator RCM performs well, even where the data were generated so that the RCM would be problematic. In an appendix, we show that the most common feasible generalized least squares estimator of the RCM models is always inferior to the maximum likelihood estimator, and in smaller samples dramatically so.

AB - This article considers random coefficient models (RCMs) for time-series-cross-section data. These models allow for unit to unit variation in the model parameters. The heart of the article compares the finite sample properties of the fully pooled estimator, the unit by unit (unpooled) estimator, and the (maximum likelihood) RCM estimator. The maximum likelihood estimator RCM performs well, even where the data were generated so that the RCM would be problematic. In an appendix, we show that the most common feasible generalized least squares estimator of the RCM models is always inferior to the maximum likelihood estimator, and in smaller samples dramatically so.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34047228678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34047228678&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/pan/mpl001

DO - 10.1093/pan/mpl001

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 182

EP - 195

JO - Political Analysis

JF - Political Analysis

SN - 1047-1987

IS - 2

ER -