Race, Space, and the Urban South

Then and Now

J. Rosie Tighe, Elana Needle, Robert Hawkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

More than half a century after Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka and the Civil Rights Movement, the cities at the heart of America’s racial conflict with itself have changed socioeconomically, culturally, and politically. Although many of these changes resulted in quality–of-life improvements for racial minorities, some questions remain about lingering bastions of segregation in the South. Using a critical race theory (CRT) lens, in this article we investigate four cities that were important to the Civil Rights Movement—Greensboro, North Carolina, Little Rock, Arkansas, Memphis, Tennessee, and Montgomery, Alabama—to examine demographic, economic, and sociocultural trends and how they affect racial minority groups. We find that, despite considerable improvement in terms of poverty rate, unemployment, and income, blacks continue to remain substantially behind whites in these cities, indicating that desegregation and access to opportunity has done little to close the black-white opportunity gap.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)96-113
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Policy Practice
Volume14
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2015

Fingerprint

segregation
minority
civil rights movement
unemployment rate
civil rights
poverty
income
trend
economics
education
Group

Keywords

  • opportunity
  • race
  • segregation
  • socioeconomic outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Race, Space, and the Urban South : Then and Now. / Tighe, J. Rosie; Needle, Elana; Hawkins, Robert.

In: Journal of Policy Practice, Vol. 14, No. 2, 03.04.2015, p. 96-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tighe, J. Rosie ; Needle, Elana ; Hawkins, Robert. / Race, Space, and the Urban South : Then and Now. In: Journal of Policy Practice. 2015 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 96-113.
@article{212b761dbdd8471f88857c4f2241e3a1,
title = "Race, Space, and the Urban South: Then and Now",
abstract = "More than half a century after Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka and the Civil Rights Movement, the cities at the heart of America’s racial conflict with itself have changed socioeconomically, culturally, and politically. Although many of these changes resulted in quality–of-life improvements for racial minorities, some questions remain about lingering bastions of segregation in the South. Using a critical race theory (CRT) lens, in this article we investigate four cities that were important to the Civil Rights Movement—Greensboro, North Carolina, Little Rock, Arkansas, Memphis, Tennessee, and Montgomery, Alabama—to examine demographic, economic, and sociocultural trends and how they affect racial minority groups. We find that, despite considerable improvement in terms of poverty rate, unemployment, and income, blacks continue to remain substantially behind whites in these cities, indicating that desegregation and access to opportunity has done little to close the black-white opportunity gap.",
keywords = "opportunity, race, segregation, socioeconomic outcomes",
author = "Tighe, {J. Rosie} and Elana Needle and Robert Hawkins",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/15588742.2014.995784",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "96--113",
journal = "Journal of Policy Practice",
issn = "1558-8742",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race, Space, and the Urban South

T2 - Then and Now

AU - Tighe, J. Rosie

AU - Needle, Elana

AU - Hawkins, Robert

PY - 2015/4/3

Y1 - 2015/4/3

N2 - More than half a century after Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka and the Civil Rights Movement, the cities at the heart of America’s racial conflict with itself have changed socioeconomically, culturally, and politically. Although many of these changes resulted in quality–of-life improvements for racial minorities, some questions remain about lingering bastions of segregation in the South. Using a critical race theory (CRT) lens, in this article we investigate four cities that were important to the Civil Rights Movement—Greensboro, North Carolina, Little Rock, Arkansas, Memphis, Tennessee, and Montgomery, Alabama—to examine demographic, economic, and sociocultural trends and how they affect racial minority groups. We find that, despite considerable improvement in terms of poverty rate, unemployment, and income, blacks continue to remain substantially behind whites in these cities, indicating that desegregation and access to opportunity has done little to close the black-white opportunity gap.

AB - More than half a century after Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka and the Civil Rights Movement, the cities at the heart of America’s racial conflict with itself have changed socioeconomically, culturally, and politically. Although many of these changes resulted in quality–of-life improvements for racial minorities, some questions remain about lingering bastions of segregation in the South. Using a critical race theory (CRT) lens, in this article we investigate four cities that were important to the Civil Rights Movement—Greensboro, North Carolina, Little Rock, Arkansas, Memphis, Tennessee, and Montgomery, Alabama—to examine demographic, economic, and sociocultural trends and how they affect racial minority groups. We find that, despite considerable improvement in terms of poverty rate, unemployment, and income, blacks continue to remain substantially behind whites in these cities, indicating that desegregation and access to opportunity has done little to close the black-white opportunity gap.

KW - opportunity

KW - race

KW - segregation

KW - socioeconomic outcomes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927648548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927648548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15588742.2014.995784

DO - 10.1080/15588742.2014.995784

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 96

EP - 113

JO - Journal of Policy Practice

JF - Journal of Policy Practice

SN - 1558-8742

IS - 2

ER -