Race, law, and health: Examination of 'Stand Your Ground' and defendant convictions in Florida

Nicole Ackermann, Melody Goodman, Keon Gilbert, Cassandra Arroyo-Johnson, Marcello Pagano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous analyses of Stand Your Ground (SYG) cases have been primarily descriptive. We examine the relationship between race of the victim and conviction of the defendant in SYG cases in Florida from 2005 to 2013. Using a regression analytic approach, we allow for simultaneous examination of multiple factors to better understand existing interrelationships. Data was obtained from the Tampa Bay Times SYG database (237 cases) which was supplemented with available online court documents and/or news reports. After excluding cases which were, still pending as of January 2015; had multiple outcomes (because of multiple suspects); and missing information on race of victim and weapon of victim, our final analytic sample has 204 cases. We chose whether the case resulted in a conviction as the outcome. We develop logistic regression models using significant bivariate predictors as candidates. These include race of the victim (White, non-White), whether the defendant could have retreated from the situation, whether the defendant pursued the victim, if the victim was unarmed, and who was the initiator of the confrontation. We find race of the victim to be a significant predictor of case outcome in this data set. After controlling for other variables, the defendant is two times (OR = 2.1, 95% CI [1.07, 4.10]) more likely to be convicted in a case that involves White victims compared to those involving non-White victims. Our results depict a disturbing message: SYG legislation in Florida has a quantifiable racial bias that reveals a leniency in convictions if the victim is non-White, which provides evidence towards unequal treatment under the law. Rather than attempting to hide the outcomes of these laws, as was done in Florida, other states with SYG laws should carry out similar analyses to see if their manifestations are the same as those in Florida, and all should remediate any injustices found.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-201
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume142
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

examination
Law
Health
health
Logistic Models
Racism
Weapons
Legislation
Databases
Conviction
news report
regression
weapon
candidacy
logistics
legislation
Therapeutics
trend
evidence
Datasets

Keywords

  • Florida
  • Law
  • Race
  • Stand Your Ground
  • USA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • History and Philosophy of Science

Cite this

Race, law, and health : Examination of 'Stand Your Ground' and defendant convictions in Florida. / Ackermann, Nicole; Goodman, Melody; Gilbert, Keon; Arroyo-Johnson, Cassandra; Pagano, Marcello.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 142, 01.10.2015, p. 194-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ackermann, Nicole ; Goodman, Melody ; Gilbert, Keon ; Arroyo-Johnson, Cassandra ; Pagano, Marcello. / Race, law, and health : Examination of 'Stand Your Ground' and defendant convictions in Florida. In: Social Science and Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 142. pp. 194-201.
@article{72ee568ee53549af95c48c9bdd15ffbd,
title = "Race, law, and health: Examination of 'Stand Your Ground' and defendant convictions in Florida",
abstract = "Previous analyses of Stand Your Ground (SYG) cases have been primarily descriptive. We examine the relationship between race of the victim and conviction of the defendant in SYG cases in Florida from 2005 to 2013. Using a regression analytic approach, we allow for simultaneous examination of multiple factors to better understand existing interrelationships. Data was obtained from the Tampa Bay Times SYG database (237 cases) which was supplemented with available online court documents and/or news reports. After excluding cases which were, still pending as of January 2015; had multiple outcomes (because of multiple suspects); and missing information on race of victim and weapon of victim, our final analytic sample has 204 cases. We chose whether the case resulted in a conviction as the outcome. We develop logistic regression models using significant bivariate predictors as candidates. These include race of the victim (White, non-White), whether the defendant could have retreated from the situation, whether the defendant pursued the victim, if the victim was unarmed, and who was the initiator of the confrontation. We find race of the victim to be a significant predictor of case outcome in this data set. After controlling for other variables, the defendant is two times (OR = 2.1, 95{\%} CI [1.07, 4.10]) more likely to be convicted in a case that involves White victims compared to those involving non-White victims. Our results depict a disturbing message: SYG legislation in Florida has a quantifiable racial bias that reveals a leniency in convictions if the victim is non-White, which provides evidence towards unequal treatment under the law. Rather than attempting to hide the outcomes of these laws, as was done in Florida, other states with SYG laws should carry out similar analyses to see if their manifestations are the same as those in Florida, and all should remediate any injustices found.",
keywords = "Florida, Law, Race, Stand Your Ground, USA",
author = "Nicole Ackermann and Melody Goodman and Keon Gilbert and Cassandra Arroyo-Johnson and Marcello Pagano",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "194--201",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race, law, and health

T2 - Examination of 'Stand Your Ground' and defendant convictions in Florida

AU - Ackermann, Nicole

AU - Goodman, Melody

AU - Gilbert, Keon

AU - Arroyo-Johnson, Cassandra

AU - Pagano, Marcello

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Previous analyses of Stand Your Ground (SYG) cases have been primarily descriptive. We examine the relationship between race of the victim and conviction of the defendant in SYG cases in Florida from 2005 to 2013. Using a regression analytic approach, we allow for simultaneous examination of multiple factors to better understand existing interrelationships. Data was obtained from the Tampa Bay Times SYG database (237 cases) which was supplemented with available online court documents and/or news reports. After excluding cases which were, still pending as of January 2015; had multiple outcomes (because of multiple suspects); and missing information on race of victim and weapon of victim, our final analytic sample has 204 cases. We chose whether the case resulted in a conviction as the outcome. We develop logistic regression models using significant bivariate predictors as candidates. These include race of the victim (White, non-White), whether the defendant could have retreated from the situation, whether the defendant pursued the victim, if the victim was unarmed, and who was the initiator of the confrontation. We find race of the victim to be a significant predictor of case outcome in this data set. After controlling for other variables, the defendant is two times (OR = 2.1, 95% CI [1.07, 4.10]) more likely to be convicted in a case that involves White victims compared to those involving non-White victims. Our results depict a disturbing message: SYG legislation in Florida has a quantifiable racial bias that reveals a leniency in convictions if the victim is non-White, which provides evidence towards unequal treatment under the law. Rather than attempting to hide the outcomes of these laws, as was done in Florida, other states with SYG laws should carry out similar analyses to see if their manifestations are the same as those in Florida, and all should remediate any injustices found.

AB - Previous analyses of Stand Your Ground (SYG) cases have been primarily descriptive. We examine the relationship between race of the victim and conviction of the defendant in SYG cases in Florida from 2005 to 2013. Using a regression analytic approach, we allow for simultaneous examination of multiple factors to better understand existing interrelationships. Data was obtained from the Tampa Bay Times SYG database (237 cases) which was supplemented with available online court documents and/or news reports. After excluding cases which were, still pending as of January 2015; had multiple outcomes (because of multiple suspects); and missing information on race of victim and weapon of victim, our final analytic sample has 204 cases. We chose whether the case resulted in a conviction as the outcome. We develop logistic regression models using significant bivariate predictors as candidates. These include race of the victim (White, non-White), whether the defendant could have retreated from the situation, whether the defendant pursued the victim, if the victim was unarmed, and who was the initiator of the confrontation. We find race of the victim to be a significant predictor of case outcome in this data set. After controlling for other variables, the defendant is two times (OR = 2.1, 95% CI [1.07, 4.10]) more likely to be convicted in a case that involves White victims compared to those involving non-White victims. Our results depict a disturbing message: SYG legislation in Florida has a quantifiable racial bias that reveals a leniency in convictions if the victim is non-White, which provides evidence towards unequal treatment under the law. Rather than attempting to hide the outcomes of these laws, as was done in Florida, other states with SYG laws should carry out similar analyses to see if their manifestations are the same as those in Florida, and all should remediate any injustices found.

KW - Florida

KW - Law

KW - Race

KW - Stand Your Ground

KW - USA

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951923212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84951923212&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.012

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.08.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 26313247

AN - SCOPUS:84951923212

VL - 142

SP - 194

EP - 201

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

ER -