Race and Recession: Effects of Economic Scarcity on Racial Discrimination

Amy R. Krosch, Tom R. Tyler, David Amodio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When the economy declines, existing racial disparities typically expand, suggesting that economic scarcity may promote racial discrimination. To understand this pattern, we examined the effect of perceived scarcity on resource allocations to Black and White American recipients, and tested whether this effect depends on a decision maker's motivation to respond without prejudice. We proposed that scarcity would lead to increased discrimination among those with relatively low internal motivation but not those high in internal motivation. Indeed, we found that when resources were framed as scarce (vs. abundant or a control condition), low-motivation participants allocated less to Black than White recipients, whereas high-motivation participants allocated more to Black than White recipients (Studies 1 and 2). This pattern was strongest when decisions could be made deliberatively (Study 3), and anti-Black allocation bias emerged even in a non-zero-sum context (Studies 4 and 5), suggesting a strategic bias directed against Black recipients rather than in favor of White recipients. These findings indicate that the psychological perception of scarcity can produce racial bias in the distribution of economic resources, depending on the motivations of the decision maker-an effect that may contribute to the increase in racial disparities observed during economic stress. (PsycINFO Database Record

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Sep 14 2017

Fingerprint

Economic Recession
Racism
recession
racism
Motivation
recipient
economics
Economics
decision maker
trend
resources
Resource Allocation
prejudice
discrimination
Psychology
economy

Keywords

  • Discrimination
  • Intergroup bias
  • Prejudice
  • Scarcity
  • Threat

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Race and Recession : Effects of Economic Scarcity on Racial Discrimination. / Krosch, Amy R.; Tyler, Tom R.; Amodio, David.

In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14.09.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c484b729b714da2a72a52f240593e04,
title = "Race and Recession: Effects of Economic Scarcity on Racial Discrimination",
abstract = "When the economy declines, existing racial disparities typically expand, suggesting that economic scarcity may promote racial discrimination. To understand this pattern, we examined the effect of perceived scarcity on resource allocations to Black and White American recipients, and tested whether this effect depends on a decision maker's motivation to respond without prejudice. We proposed that scarcity would lead to increased discrimination among those with relatively low internal motivation but not those high in internal motivation. Indeed, we found that when resources were framed as scarce (vs. abundant or a control condition), low-motivation participants allocated less to Black than White recipients, whereas high-motivation participants allocated more to Black than White recipients (Studies 1 and 2). This pattern was strongest when decisions could be made deliberatively (Study 3), and anti-Black allocation bias emerged even in a non-zero-sum context (Studies 4 and 5), suggesting a strategic bias directed against Black recipients rather than in favor of White recipients. These findings indicate that the psychological perception of scarcity can produce racial bias in the distribution of economic resources, depending on the motivations of the decision maker-an effect that may contribute to the increase in racial disparities observed during economic stress. (PsycINFO Database Record",
keywords = "Discrimination, Intergroup bias, Prejudice, Scarcity, Threat",
author = "Krosch, {Amy R.} and Tyler, {Tom R.} and David Amodio",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1037/pspi0000112",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race and Recession

T2 - Effects of Economic Scarcity on Racial Discrimination

AU - Krosch, Amy R.

AU - Tyler, Tom R.

AU - Amodio, David

PY - 2017/9/14

Y1 - 2017/9/14

N2 - When the economy declines, existing racial disparities typically expand, suggesting that economic scarcity may promote racial discrimination. To understand this pattern, we examined the effect of perceived scarcity on resource allocations to Black and White American recipients, and tested whether this effect depends on a decision maker's motivation to respond without prejudice. We proposed that scarcity would lead to increased discrimination among those with relatively low internal motivation but not those high in internal motivation. Indeed, we found that when resources were framed as scarce (vs. abundant or a control condition), low-motivation participants allocated less to Black than White recipients, whereas high-motivation participants allocated more to Black than White recipients (Studies 1 and 2). This pattern was strongest when decisions could be made deliberatively (Study 3), and anti-Black allocation bias emerged even in a non-zero-sum context (Studies 4 and 5), suggesting a strategic bias directed against Black recipients rather than in favor of White recipients. These findings indicate that the psychological perception of scarcity can produce racial bias in the distribution of economic resources, depending on the motivations of the decision maker-an effect that may contribute to the increase in racial disparities observed during economic stress. (PsycINFO Database Record

AB - When the economy declines, existing racial disparities typically expand, suggesting that economic scarcity may promote racial discrimination. To understand this pattern, we examined the effect of perceived scarcity on resource allocations to Black and White American recipients, and tested whether this effect depends on a decision maker's motivation to respond without prejudice. We proposed that scarcity would lead to increased discrimination among those with relatively low internal motivation but not those high in internal motivation. Indeed, we found that when resources were framed as scarce (vs. abundant or a control condition), low-motivation participants allocated less to Black than White recipients, whereas high-motivation participants allocated more to Black than White recipients (Studies 1 and 2). This pattern was strongest when decisions could be made deliberatively (Study 3), and anti-Black allocation bias emerged even in a non-zero-sum context (Studies 4 and 5), suggesting a strategic bias directed against Black recipients rather than in favor of White recipients. These findings indicate that the psychological perception of scarcity can produce racial bias in the distribution of economic resources, depending on the motivations of the decision maker-an effect that may contribute to the increase in racial disparities observed during economic stress. (PsycINFO Database Record

KW - Discrimination

KW - Intergroup bias

KW - Prejudice

KW - Scarcity

KW - Threat

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029318878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85029318878&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/pspi0000112

DO - 10.1037/pspi0000112

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

ER -