Quantitative leverage through qualitative knowledge

Augmenting the statistical analysis of complex causes

Sanford Gordon, Alastair Smith

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    Abstract

    Social scientific theories frequently posit that multiple causal mechanisms may produce the same outcome. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to observe which mechanism was responsible. For example, IMF scholars conjecture that nations enter IMF agreements both out of economic need and for discretionary domestic political reasons. Typically, though, all we observe is the fact of agreement, not its cause. Partial observability probit models (Poirier 1980, Journal of Econometrics 12:209-217; Braumoeller 2003, Political Analysis 11:209-233) provide one method for the statistical analysis of such phenomena. Unfortunately, they are often plagued by identification and labeling difficulties. Sometimes, however, qualitative studies of particular cases enlighten us about causes when quantitative studies cannot. We propose exploiting this information to lend additional structure to the partial observability approach. Monte Carlo simulation reveals that by anchoring "discernible" causes for a handful of cases about which we possess qualitative information, we obtain greater efficiency. More important, our method proves reliable at recovering unbiased parameter estimates when the partial observability model fails. The paper concludes with an analysis of the determinants of IMF agreements.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)233-255
    Number of pages23
    JournalPolitical Analysis
    Volume12
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jun 2004

    Fingerprint

    IMF
    statistical analysis
    cause
    econometrics
    determinants
    efficiency
    simulation
    economics

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Sociology and Political Science

    Cite this

    Quantitative leverage through qualitative knowledge : Augmenting the statistical analysis of complex causes. / Gordon, Sanford; Smith, Alastair.

    In: Political Analysis, Vol. 12, No. 3, 06.2004, p. 233-255.

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

    @article{ab81439e09ab433c8697de5f020576a4,
    title = "Quantitative leverage through qualitative knowledge: Augmenting the statistical analysis of complex causes",
    abstract = "Social scientific theories frequently posit that multiple causal mechanisms may produce the same outcome. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to observe which mechanism was responsible. For example, IMF scholars conjecture that nations enter IMF agreements both out of economic need and for discretionary domestic political reasons. Typically, though, all we observe is the fact of agreement, not its cause. Partial observability probit models (Poirier 1980, Journal of Econometrics 12:209-217; Braumoeller 2003, Political Analysis 11:209-233) provide one method for the statistical analysis of such phenomena. Unfortunately, they are often plagued by identification and labeling difficulties. Sometimes, however, qualitative studies of particular cases enlighten us about causes when quantitative studies cannot. We propose exploiting this information to lend additional structure to the partial observability approach. Monte Carlo simulation reveals that by anchoring {"}discernible{"} causes for a handful of cases about which we possess qualitative information, we obtain greater efficiency. More important, our method proves reliable at recovering unbiased parameter estimates when the partial observability model fails. The paper concludes with an analysis of the determinants of IMF agreements.",
    author = "Sanford Gordon and Alastair Smith",
    year = "2004",
    month = "6",
    doi = "10.1093/pan/mph017",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "12",
    pages = "233--255",
    journal = "Political Analysis",
    issn = "1047-1987",
    publisher = "Oxford University Press",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Quantitative leverage through qualitative knowledge

    T2 - Augmenting the statistical analysis of complex causes

    AU - Gordon, Sanford

    AU - Smith, Alastair

    PY - 2004/6

    Y1 - 2004/6

    N2 - Social scientific theories frequently posit that multiple causal mechanisms may produce the same outcome. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to observe which mechanism was responsible. For example, IMF scholars conjecture that nations enter IMF agreements both out of economic need and for discretionary domestic political reasons. Typically, though, all we observe is the fact of agreement, not its cause. Partial observability probit models (Poirier 1980, Journal of Econometrics 12:209-217; Braumoeller 2003, Political Analysis 11:209-233) provide one method for the statistical analysis of such phenomena. Unfortunately, they are often plagued by identification and labeling difficulties. Sometimes, however, qualitative studies of particular cases enlighten us about causes when quantitative studies cannot. We propose exploiting this information to lend additional structure to the partial observability approach. Monte Carlo simulation reveals that by anchoring "discernible" causes for a handful of cases about which we possess qualitative information, we obtain greater efficiency. More important, our method proves reliable at recovering unbiased parameter estimates when the partial observability model fails. The paper concludes with an analysis of the determinants of IMF agreements.

    AB - Social scientific theories frequently posit that multiple causal mechanisms may produce the same outcome. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to observe which mechanism was responsible. For example, IMF scholars conjecture that nations enter IMF agreements both out of economic need and for discretionary domestic political reasons. Typically, though, all we observe is the fact of agreement, not its cause. Partial observability probit models (Poirier 1980, Journal of Econometrics 12:209-217; Braumoeller 2003, Political Analysis 11:209-233) provide one method for the statistical analysis of such phenomena. Unfortunately, they are often plagued by identification and labeling difficulties. Sometimes, however, qualitative studies of particular cases enlighten us about causes when quantitative studies cannot. We propose exploiting this information to lend additional structure to the partial observability approach. Monte Carlo simulation reveals that by anchoring "discernible" causes for a handful of cases about which we possess qualitative information, we obtain greater efficiency. More important, our method proves reliable at recovering unbiased parameter estimates when the partial observability model fails. The paper concludes with an analysis of the determinants of IMF agreements.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=22944470406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=22944470406&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1093/pan/mph017

    DO - 10.1093/pan/mph017

    M3 - Review article

    VL - 12

    SP - 233

    EP - 255

    JO - Political Analysis

    JF - Political Analysis

    SN - 1047-1987

    IS - 3

    ER -