Quantitative evaluation of the community research fellows training program

Lucy D.Agostino McGowan, Jewel D. Stafford, Vetta Lynn Thompson, Bethany Johnson-Javois, Melody Goodman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context: The community research fellows training (CRFT) programis a community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative for the St. Louis area. This 15-week program, based on a Master in Public Health curriculum, was implemented by the Division of Public Health Sciences at Washington University School of Medicine and the Siteman Cancer Center. Objectives: We measure the knowledge gained by participants and evaluate participant and faculty satisfaction of the CRFT program both in terms of meeting learning objectives and actively engaging the community in the research process. Participants: We conducted analyses on 44 community members who participated in the CRFT program and completed the baseline and follow-up knowledge assessments. Main outcome measures: Knowledge gain is measured by a baseline and follow-up assessment given at the first and final session. Additionally, preand post-tests are given after the first 12 sessions. To measure satisfaction, program evaluations are completed by both the participants and faculty after each topic. Mid-way through the program, a mid-term evaluation was administered to assess the program's community engagement. We analyzed the results from the assessments, preand post-tests, and evaluations. Results: The CRFT participants' knowledge increased at follow-up as compared with baseline on average by a 16.5 point difference (p>0.0001). Post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores for 11 of the 12 sessions. Both participants and faculty enjoyed the training and rated all session well. Conclusion: The CRFT program was successful in increasing community knowledge, participant satisfaction, and faculty satisfaction. This success has enhanced the infrastructure for CBPR as well as led to CBPR pilot projects that address health disparities in the St. Louis Greater Metropolitan Area.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number179
JournalFrontiers in Public Health
Volume3
Issue numberJUL
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 16 2015

Fingerprint

Education
Community-Based Participatory Research
Research
Public Health
Program Evaluation
Curriculum
Medicine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Learning
Health
Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Community education
  • Community-based participatory research
  • Health disparities
  • Health education
  • Public health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Quantitative evaluation of the community research fellows training program. / McGowan, Lucy D.Agostino; Stafford, Jewel D.; Thompson, Vetta Lynn; Johnson-Javois, Bethany; Goodman, Melody.

In: Frontiers in Public Health, Vol. 3, No. JUL, 179, 16.07.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McGowan, Lucy D.Agostino ; Stafford, Jewel D. ; Thompson, Vetta Lynn ; Johnson-Javois, Bethany ; Goodman, Melody. / Quantitative evaluation of the community research fellows training program. In: Frontiers in Public Health. 2015 ; Vol. 3, No. JUL.
@article{c1098131ff3745daade8542ab42588fb,
title = "Quantitative evaluation of the community research fellows training program",
abstract = "Context: The community research fellows training (CRFT) programis a community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative for the St. Louis area. This 15-week program, based on a Master in Public Health curriculum, was implemented by the Division of Public Health Sciences at Washington University School of Medicine and the Siteman Cancer Center. Objectives: We measure the knowledge gained by participants and evaluate participant and faculty satisfaction of the CRFT program both in terms of meeting learning objectives and actively engaging the community in the research process. Participants: We conducted analyses on 44 community members who participated in the CRFT program and completed the baseline and follow-up knowledge assessments. Main outcome measures: Knowledge gain is measured by a baseline and follow-up assessment given at the first and final session. Additionally, preand post-tests are given after the first 12 sessions. To measure satisfaction, program evaluations are completed by both the participants and faculty after each topic. Mid-way through the program, a mid-term evaluation was administered to assess the program's community engagement. We analyzed the results from the assessments, preand post-tests, and evaluations. Results: The CRFT participants' knowledge increased at follow-up as compared with baseline on average by a 16.5 point difference (p>0.0001). Post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores for 11 of the 12 sessions. Both participants and faculty enjoyed the training and rated all session well. Conclusion: The CRFT program was successful in increasing community knowledge, participant satisfaction, and faculty satisfaction. This success has enhanced the infrastructure for CBPR as well as led to CBPR pilot projects that address health disparities in the St. Louis Greater Metropolitan Area.",
keywords = "Community education, Community-based participatory research, Health disparities, Health education, Public health",
author = "McGowan, {Lucy D.Agostino} and Stafford, {Jewel D.} and Thompson, {Vetta Lynn} and Bethany Johnson-Javois and Melody Goodman",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "16",
doi = "10.3389/fpubh.2015.00179",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
journal = "Frontiers in Public Health",
issn = "2296-2565",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "JUL",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative evaluation of the community research fellows training program

AU - McGowan, Lucy D.Agostino

AU - Stafford, Jewel D.

AU - Thompson, Vetta Lynn

AU - Johnson-Javois, Bethany

AU - Goodman, Melody

PY - 2015/7/16

Y1 - 2015/7/16

N2 - Context: The community research fellows training (CRFT) programis a community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative for the St. Louis area. This 15-week program, based on a Master in Public Health curriculum, was implemented by the Division of Public Health Sciences at Washington University School of Medicine and the Siteman Cancer Center. Objectives: We measure the knowledge gained by participants and evaluate participant and faculty satisfaction of the CRFT program both in terms of meeting learning objectives and actively engaging the community in the research process. Participants: We conducted analyses on 44 community members who participated in the CRFT program and completed the baseline and follow-up knowledge assessments. Main outcome measures: Knowledge gain is measured by a baseline and follow-up assessment given at the first and final session. Additionally, preand post-tests are given after the first 12 sessions. To measure satisfaction, program evaluations are completed by both the participants and faculty after each topic. Mid-way through the program, a mid-term evaluation was administered to assess the program's community engagement. We analyzed the results from the assessments, preand post-tests, and evaluations. Results: The CRFT participants' knowledge increased at follow-up as compared with baseline on average by a 16.5 point difference (p>0.0001). Post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores for 11 of the 12 sessions. Both participants and faculty enjoyed the training and rated all session well. Conclusion: The CRFT program was successful in increasing community knowledge, participant satisfaction, and faculty satisfaction. This success has enhanced the infrastructure for CBPR as well as led to CBPR pilot projects that address health disparities in the St. Louis Greater Metropolitan Area.

AB - Context: The community research fellows training (CRFT) programis a community-based participatory research (CBPR) initiative for the St. Louis area. This 15-week program, based on a Master in Public Health curriculum, was implemented by the Division of Public Health Sciences at Washington University School of Medicine and the Siteman Cancer Center. Objectives: We measure the knowledge gained by participants and evaluate participant and faculty satisfaction of the CRFT program both in terms of meeting learning objectives and actively engaging the community in the research process. Participants: We conducted analyses on 44 community members who participated in the CRFT program and completed the baseline and follow-up knowledge assessments. Main outcome measures: Knowledge gain is measured by a baseline and follow-up assessment given at the first and final session. Additionally, preand post-tests are given after the first 12 sessions. To measure satisfaction, program evaluations are completed by both the participants and faculty after each topic. Mid-way through the program, a mid-term evaluation was administered to assess the program's community engagement. We analyzed the results from the assessments, preand post-tests, and evaluations. Results: The CRFT participants' knowledge increased at follow-up as compared with baseline on average by a 16.5 point difference (p>0.0001). Post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores for 11 of the 12 sessions. Both participants and faculty enjoyed the training and rated all session well. Conclusion: The CRFT program was successful in increasing community knowledge, participant satisfaction, and faculty satisfaction. This success has enhanced the infrastructure for CBPR as well as led to CBPR pilot projects that address health disparities in the St. Louis Greater Metropolitan Area.

KW - Community education

KW - Community-based participatory research

KW - Health disparities

KW - Health education

KW - Public health

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014704156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014704156&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00179

DO - 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00179

M3 - Article

VL - 3

JO - Frontiers in Public Health

JF - Frontiers in Public Health

SN - 2296-2565

IS - JUL

M1 - 179

ER -