### Abstract

In my recent paper [1] there is a mistake in the proof of Corollary 3. The first line of the displayed equation in that proof asserts that (Formula presented.) However, since the paper uses complex-valued representations, the integrand on the right here may not retain the absolute value of that on the left. Without this equality, the proof of Corollary 3 can no longer be reduced to an application of Lemma 2. However, it can be proved directly from Schur Orthogonality along very similar lines to the proof of Lemma 2.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Journal | Combinatorics Probability and Computing |

DOIs | |

State | Accepted/In press - Sep 22 2015 |

### Fingerprint

### ASJC Scopus subject areas

- Applied Mathematics
- Theoretical Computer Science
- Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Statistics and Probability

### Cite this

**Quantitative Equidistribution for Certain Quadruples in Quasi-Random Groups : Erratum.** / AUSTIN, TIM.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative Equidistribution for Certain Quadruples in Quasi-Random Groups

T2 - Erratum

AU - AUSTIN, TIM

PY - 2015/9/22

Y1 - 2015/9/22

N2 - In my recent paper [1] there is a mistake in the proof of Corollary 3. The first line of the displayed equation in that proof asserts that (Formula presented.) However, since the paper uses complex-valued representations, the integrand on the right here may not retain the absolute value of that on the left. Without this equality, the proof of Corollary 3 can no longer be reduced to an application of Lemma 2. However, it can be proved directly from Schur Orthogonality along very similar lines to the proof of Lemma 2.

AB - In my recent paper [1] there is a mistake in the proof of Corollary 3. The first line of the displayed equation in that proof asserts that (Formula presented.) However, since the paper uses complex-valued representations, the integrand on the right here may not retain the absolute value of that on the left. Without this equality, the proof of Corollary 3 can no longer be reduced to an application of Lemma 2. However, it can be proved directly from Schur Orthogonality along very similar lines to the proof of Lemma 2.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84943784732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84943784732&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S0963548315000243

DO - 10.1017/S0963548315000243

M3 - Article

JO - Combinatorics Probability and Computing

JF - Combinatorics Probability and Computing

SN - 0963-5483

ER -