Quantitative assessment of participant knowledge and evaluation of participant satisfaction in the CARES training program

Melody Goodman, Xuemei Si, Jewel D. Stafford, Adesuwa Obasohan, Cheryl Mchunguzi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the Community Alliance for Research Empowering Social change (CARES) training program was to (1) train community members on evidencebased public health, (2) increase their scientific literacy, and (3) develop the infrastructure for community-based participatory research (CBPR). Objectives: We assessed participant knowledge and evaluated participant satisfaction of the CARES training program to identify learning needs, obtain valuable feedback about the training, and ensure learning objectives were met through mutually beneficial CBPR approaches. Methods: A baseline assessment was administered before the first training session and a follow-up assessment and evaluation was administered after the final training session. At each training session a pretest was administered before the session and a posttest and evaluation were administered at the end of the session. After training session six, a midtraining evaluation was administered. We analyze results from quantitative questions on the assessments, pre- and post-tests, and evaluations. Results: CARES fellows knowledge increased at follow-up (75% of questions were answered correctly on average) compared with baseline (38% of questions were answered correctly on average) assessment; post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores in 9 out of 11 sessions. Fellows enjoyed the training and rated all sessions well on the evaluations. Conclusions: The CARES fellows training program was successful in participant satisfaction and increasing community knowledge of public health, CBPR, and research methodology. Engaging and training community members in evidence-based public health research can develop an infrastructure for community-academic research partnerships.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-368
Number of pages8
JournalProgress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Social Change
training program
social change
Education
Community-Based Participatory Research
evaluation
Research
community
Public Health
public health
Learning
infrastructure
learning objective
Research Design
research approach
literacy

Keywords

  • Community research training
  • Community-academic partnerships
  • Community-based participatory research
  • Social change
  • Suburban population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Quantitative assessment of participant knowledge and evaluation of participant satisfaction in the CARES training program. / Goodman, Melody; Si, Xuemei; Stafford, Jewel D.; Obasohan, Adesuwa; Mchunguzi, Cheryl.

In: Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2012, p. 361-368.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0a6c9a0d055e449ca39da33545709a45,
title = "Quantitative assessment of participant knowledge and evaluation of participant satisfaction in the CARES training program",
abstract = "Background: The purpose of the Community Alliance for Research Empowering Social change (CARES) training program was to (1) train community members on evidencebased public health, (2) increase their scientific literacy, and (3) develop the infrastructure for community-based participatory research (CBPR). Objectives: We assessed participant knowledge and evaluated participant satisfaction of the CARES training program to identify learning needs, obtain valuable feedback about the training, and ensure learning objectives were met through mutually beneficial CBPR approaches. Methods: A baseline assessment was administered before the first training session and a follow-up assessment and evaluation was administered after the final training session. At each training session a pretest was administered before the session and a posttest and evaluation were administered at the end of the session. After training session six, a midtraining evaluation was administered. We analyze results from quantitative questions on the assessments, pre- and post-tests, and evaluations. Results: CARES fellows knowledge increased at follow-up (75{\%} of questions were answered correctly on average) compared with baseline (38{\%} of questions were answered correctly on average) assessment; post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores in 9 out of 11 sessions. Fellows enjoyed the training and rated all sessions well on the evaluations. Conclusions: The CARES fellows training program was successful in participant satisfaction and increasing community knowledge of public health, CBPR, and research methodology. Engaging and training community members in evidence-based public health research can develop an infrastructure for community-academic research partnerships.",
keywords = "Community research training, Community-academic partnerships, Community-based participatory research, Social change, Suburban population",
author = "Melody Goodman and Xuemei Si and Stafford, {Jewel D.} and Adesuwa Obasohan and Cheryl Mchunguzi",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1353/cpr.2012.0051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "6",
pages = "361--368",
journal = "Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action",
issn = "1557-0541",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative assessment of participant knowledge and evaluation of participant satisfaction in the CARES training program

AU - Goodman, Melody

AU - Si, Xuemei

AU - Stafford, Jewel D.

AU - Obasohan, Adesuwa

AU - Mchunguzi, Cheryl

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Background: The purpose of the Community Alliance for Research Empowering Social change (CARES) training program was to (1) train community members on evidencebased public health, (2) increase their scientific literacy, and (3) develop the infrastructure for community-based participatory research (CBPR). Objectives: We assessed participant knowledge and evaluated participant satisfaction of the CARES training program to identify learning needs, obtain valuable feedback about the training, and ensure learning objectives were met through mutually beneficial CBPR approaches. Methods: A baseline assessment was administered before the first training session and a follow-up assessment and evaluation was administered after the final training session. At each training session a pretest was administered before the session and a posttest and evaluation were administered at the end of the session. After training session six, a midtraining evaluation was administered. We analyze results from quantitative questions on the assessments, pre- and post-tests, and evaluations. Results: CARES fellows knowledge increased at follow-up (75% of questions were answered correctly on average) compared with baseline (38% of questions were answered correctly on average) assessment; post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores in 9 out of 11 sessions. Fellows enjoyed the training and rated all sessions well on the evaluations. Conclusions: The CARES fellows training program was successful in participant satisfaction and increasing community knowledge of public health, CBPR, and research methodology. Engaging and training community members in evidence-based public health research can develop an infrastructure for community-academic research partnerships.

AB - Background: The purpose of the Community Alliance for Research Empowering Social change (CARES) training program was to (1) train community members on evidencebased public health, (2) increase their scientific literacy, and (3) develop the infrastructure for community-based participatory research (CBPR). Objectives: We assessed participant knowledge and evaluated participant satisfaction of the CARES training program to identify learning needs, obtain valuable feedback about the training, and ensure learning objectives were met through mutually beneficial CBPR approaches. Methods: A baseline assessment was administered before the first training session and a follow-up assessment and evaluation was administered after the final training session. At each training session a pretest was administered before the session and a posttest and evaluation were administered at the end of the session. After training session six, a midtraining evaluation was administered. We analyze results from quantitative questions on the assessments, pre- and post-tests, and evaluations. Results: CARES fellows knowledge increased at follow-up (75% of questions were answered correctly on average) compared with baseline (38% of questions were answered correctly on average) assessment; post-test scores were higher than pre-test scores in 9 out of 11 sessions. Fellows enjoyed the training and rated all sessions well on the evaluations. Conclusions: The CARES fellows training program was successful in participant satisfaction and increasing community knowledge of public health, CBPR, and research methodology. Engaging and training community members in evidence-based public health research can develop an infrastructure for community-academic research partnerships.

KW - Community research training

KW - Community-academic partnerships

KW - Community-based participatory research

KW - Social change

KW - Suburban population

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867872168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867872168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2012.0051

DO - 10.1353/cpr.2012.0051

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 361

EP - 368

JO - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

JF - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action

SN - 1557-0541

IS - 3

ER -