Quality Appraisal of Child Oral Health–Related Quality of Life Measures: A Scoping Review

C. Yang, Y. O. Crystal, Ryan Ruff, A. Veitz-Keenan, R. C. McGowan, Richard Niederman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background: Children’s oral health–related quality of life (COHQoL) measures are well known and widely used. However, rigorous systematic reviews of these measures and analyses of their quality are in absence. Objectives: To systematically review and quantitatively assess the quality of COHQoL measures through a scoping review. Data Sources: Systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), HaPI (Health and Psychosocial Instruments), and DOSS (Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source). Study Eligibility: The measure’s focus was COHQoL; the child age ranged from 5 to 14 years; the publication was either a research article or a systematic review and related to caries; and it was written in English or had an English abstract. Two authors independently selected the studies. Disagreements were reconciled by group discussions with a third author. Appraisal: The International Society for Quality of Life Research minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures were used for quality appraisal. Synthesis: Descriptive analysis. Results: We identified 18 measures. Their quality scores ranged from 9.5 to 15.0 on a scale of 16. The quality appeared to bear no relationship to the citation and use of these measures. However, elements of these measures might be more useful than others, depending on the age-specific use and primary quality concerns. Limitations: Some of the information on the minimum standards of the 18 measures cannot be found in the existing literature. Measures published without English abstract were not searched. Conclusions: The quality of these measures is suboptimal. Researchers and practitioners in this field should exercise caution when choosing and using these measures. Efforts at improving the quality of the COHQoL measures, such as refining existing ones or developing new measures, are warranted. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Researchers, clinician scientists, and clinicians can use the results of this study when deciding which oral health–related quality of life measure they wish to use in children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJDR Clinical and Translational Research
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Research Personnel
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health
Dentistry
Research
PubMed
Publications
Nursing
Databases
Exercise

Keywords

  • child dentistry
  • oral hygiene; surveys and questionnaires
  • patient outcomes
  • pediatric dentistry
  • systematic reviews and evidence-based medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dentistry(all)

Cite this

Quality Appraisal of Child Oral Health–Related Quality of Life Measures : A Scoping Review. / Yang, C.; Crystal, Y. O.; Ruff, Ryan; Veitz-Keenan, A.; McGowan, R. C.; Niederman, Richard.

In: JDR Clinical and Translational Research, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{4012554bff414114bf2d90caff893cd2,
title = "Quality Appraisal of Child Oral Health–Related Quality of Life Measures: A Scoping Review",
abstract = "Background: Children’s oral health–related quality of life (COHQoL) measures are well known and widely used. However, rigorous systematic reviews of these measures and analyses of their quality are in absence. Objectives: To systematically review and quantitatively assess the quality of COHQoL measures through a scoping review. Data Sources: Systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), HaPI (Health and Psychosocial Instruments), and DOSS (Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source). Study Eligibility: The measure’s focus was COHQoL; the child age ranged from 5 to 14 years; the publication was either a research article or a systematic review and related to caries; and it was written in English or had an English abstract. Two authors independently selected the studies. Disagreements were reconciled by group discussions with a third author. Appraisal: The International Society for Quality of Life Research minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures were used for quality appraisal. Synthesis: Descriptive analysis. Results: We identified 18 measures. Their quality scores ranged from 9.5 to 15.0 on a scale of 16. The quality appeared to bear no relationship to the citation and use of these measures. However, elements of these measures might be more useful than others, depending on the age-specific use and primary quality concerns. Limitations: Some of the information on the minimum standards of the 18 measures cannot be found in the existing literature. Measures published without English abstract were not searched. Conclusions: The quality of these measures is suboptimal. Researchers and practitioners in this field should exercise caution when choosing and using these measures. Efforts at improving the quality of the COHQoL measures, such as refining existing ones or developing new measures, are warranted. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Researchers, clinician scientists, and clinicians can use the results of this study when deciding which oral health–related quality of life measure they wish to use in children.",
keywords = "child dentistry, oral hygiene; surveys and questionnaires, patient outcomes, pediatric dentistry, systematic reviews and evidence-based medicine",
author = "C. Yang and Crystal, {Y. O.} and Ryan Ruff and A. Veitz-Keenan and McGowan, {R. C.} and Richard Niederman",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2380084419855636",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "JDR Clinical and Translational Research",
issn = "2380-0844",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality Appraisal of Child Oral Health–Related Quality of Life Measures

T2 - A Scoping Review

AU - Yang, C.

AU - Crystal, Y. O.

AU - Ruff, Ryan

AU - Veitz-Keenan, A.

AU - McGowan, R. C.

AU - Niederman, Richard

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Children’s oral health–related quality of life (COHQoL) measures are well known and widely used. However, rigorous systematic reviews of these measures and analyses of their quality are in absence. Objectives: To systematically review and quantitatively assess the quality of COHQoL measures through a scoping review. Data Sources: Systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), HaPI (Health and Psychosocial Instruments), and DOSS (Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source). Study Eligibility: The measure’s focus was COHQoL; the child age ranged from 5 to 14 years; the publication was either a research article or a systematic review and related to caries; and it was written in English or had an English abstract. Two authors independently selected the studies. Disagreements were reconciled by group discussions with a third author. Appraisal: The International Society for Quality of Life Research minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures were used for quality appraisal. Synthesis: Descriptive analysis. Results: We identified 18 measures. Their quality scores ranged from 9.5 to 15.0 on a scale of 16. The quality appeared to bear no relationship to the citation and use of these measures. However, elements of these measures might be more useful than others, depending on the age-specific use and primary quality concerns. Limitations: Some of the information on the minimum standards of the 18 measures cannot be found in the existing literature. Measures published without English abstract were not searched. Conclusions: The quality of these measures is suboptimal. Researchers and practitioners in this field should exercise caution when choosing and using these measures. Efforts at improving the quality of the COHQoL measures, such as refining existing ones or developing new measures, are warranted. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Researchers, clinician scientists, and clinicians can use the results of this study when deciding which oral health–related quality of life measure they wish to use in children.

AB - Background: Children’s oral health–related quality of life (COHQoL) measures are well known and widely used. However, rigorous systematic reviews of these measures and analyses of their quality are in absence. Objectives: To systematically review and quantitatively assess the quality of COHQoL measures through a scoping review. Data Sources: Systematic literature search of PubMed, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database), HaPI (Health and Psychosocial Instruments), and DOSS (Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source). Study Eligibility: The measure’s focus was COHQoL; the child age ranged from 5 to 14 years; the publication was either a research article or a systematic review and related to caries; and it was written in English or had an English abstract. Two authors independently selected the studies. Disagreements were reconciled by group discussions with a third author. Appraisal: The International Society for Quality of Life Research minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures were used for quality appraisal. Synthesis: Descriptive analysis. Results: We identified 18 measures. Their quality scores ranged from 9.5 to 15.0 on a scale of 16. The quality appeared to bear no relationship to the citation and use of these measures. However, elements of these measures might be more useful than others, depending on the age-specific use and primary quality concerns. Limitations: Some of the information on the minimum standards of the 18 measures cannot be found in the existing literature. Measures published without English abstract were not searched. Conclusions: The quality of these measures is suboptimal. Researchers and practitioners in this field should exercise caution when choosing and using these measures. Efforts at improving the quality of the COHQoL measures, such as refining existing ones or developing new measures, are warranted. Knowledge Transfer Statement: Researchers, clinician scientists, and clinicians can use the results of this study when deciding which oral health–related quality of life measure they wish to use in children.

KW - child dentistry

KW - oral hygiene; surveys and questionnaires

KW - patient outcomes

KW - pediatric dentistry

KW - systematic reviews and evidence-based medicine

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068319279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068319279&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/2380084419855636

DO - 10.1177/2380084419855636

M3 - Review article

JO - JDR Clinical and Translational Research

JF - JDR Clinical and Translational Research

SN - 2380-0844

ER -