Qualitative Research in Nursing and Health Professions Regulation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Qualitative research is critical for studies about regulatory issues in nursing and across all health professions. When in-depth stakeholder perspectives are needed, qualitative approaches are often the best methodological choice to ensure their viewpoints and experiences are captured when evaluating the consequences of policy implementation or when informing regulation design. Unlike traditional qualitative health care studies that involve patients or providers in single settings, regulatory studies often have complex challenges related to the available sample sizes, sampling strategies, and data collection approaches. Reporting qualitative findings in ways that are informative, useful, and dialogue provoking about regulatory issues must go beyond inserting long quotes with a single sentence explanation. Artfully capturing the participants’ stories within the regulatory matter under study is vital for understanding potential and actual consequences of regulations. This article provides an overview of common methodological challenges researchers encounter when conducting qualitative research on professional regulation issues and offers solutions to enhance the quality, rigor, and trustworthiness of the findings. The recommendations may prove useful to researchers examining regulatory issues in nursing and other health professions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)15-26
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Nursing Regulation
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2018

Fingerprint

Health Occupations
Qualitative Research
Nursing
Research Personnel
Sample Size
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • Credentialing
  • government regulation
  • licensure
  • policy
  • professional autonomy
  • qualitative research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Nursing (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Qualitative Research in Nursing and Health Professions Regulation. / Squires, Allison; Dorsen, Caroline.

In: Journal of Nursing Regulation, Vol. 9, No. 3, 01.10.2018, p. 15-26.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff35a36177fc4ab49957048e672aa0a3,
title = "Qualitative Research in Nursing and Health Professions Regulation",
abstract = "Qualitative research is critical for studies about regulatory issues in nursing and across all health professions. When in-depth stakeholder perspectives are needed, qualitative approaches are often the best methodological choice to ensure their viewpoints and experiences are captured when evaluating the consequences of policy implementation or when informing regulation design. Unlike traditional qualitative health care studies that involve patients or providers in single settings, regulatory studies often have complex challenges related to the available sample sizes, sampling strategies, and data collection approaches. Reporting qualitative findings in ways that are informative, useful, and dialogue provoking about regulatory issues must go beyond inserting long quotes with a single sentence explanation. Artfully capturing the participants’ stories within the regulatory matter under study is vital for understanding potential and actual consequences of regulations. This article provides an overview of common methodological challenges researchers encounter when conducting qualitative research on professional regulation issues and offers solutions to enhance the quality, rigor, and trustworthiness of the findings. The recommendations may prove useful to researchers examining regulatory issues in nursing and other health professions.",
keywords = "Credentialing, government regulation, licensure, policy, professional autonomy, qualitative research",
author = "Allison Squires and Caroline Dorsen",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S2155-8256(18)30150-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "15--26",
journal = "Journal of Nursing Regulation",
issn = "2155-8256",
publisher = "National Council of State Boards of Nursing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative Research in Nursing and Health Professions Regulation

AU - Squires, Allison

AU - Dorsen, Caroline

PY - 2018/10/1

Y1 - 2018/10/1

N2 - Qualitative research is critical for studies about regulatory issues in nursing and across all health professions. When in-depth stakeholder perspectives are needed, qualitative approaches are often the best methodological choice to ensure their viewpoints and experiences are captured when evaluating the consequences of policy implementation or when informing regulation design. Unlike traditional qualitative health care studies that involve patients or providers in single settings, regulatory studies often have complex challenges related to the available sample sizes, sampling strategies, and data collection approaches. Reporting qualitative findings in ways that are informative, useful, and dialogue provoking about regulatory issues must go beyond inserting long quotes with a single sentence explanation. Artfully capturing the participants’ stories within the regulatory matter under study is vital for understanding potential and actual consequences of regulations. This article provides an overview of common methodological challenges researchers encounter when conducting qualitative research on professional regulation issues and offers solutions to enhance the quality, rigor, and trustworthiness of the findings. The recommendations may prove useful to researchers examining regulatory issues in nursing and other health professions.

AB - Qualitative research is critical for studies about regulatory issues in nursing and across all health professions. When in-depth stakeholder perspectives are needed, qualitative approaches are often the best methodological choice to ensure their viewpoints and experiences are captured when evaluating the consequences of policy implementation or when informing regulation design. Unlike traditional qualitative health care studies that involve patients or providers in single settings, regulatory studies often have complex challenges related to the available sample sizes, sampling strategies, and data collection approaches. Reporting qualitative findings in ways that are informative, useful, and dialogue provoking about regulatory issues must go beyond inserting long quotes with a single sentence explanation. Artfully capturing the participants’ stories within the regulatory matter under study is vital for understanding potential and actual consequences of regulations. This article provides an overview of common methodological challenges researchers encounter when conducting qualitative research on professional regulation issues and offers solutions to enhance the quality, rigor, and trustworthiness of the findings. The recommendations may prove useful to researchers examining regulatory issues in nursing and other health professions.

KW - Credentialing

KW - government regulation

KW - licensure

KW - policy

KW - professional autonomy

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054272604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054272604&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S2155-8256(18)30150-9

DO - 10.1016/S2155-8256(18)30150-9

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 15

EP - 26

JO - Journal of Nursing Regulation

JF - Journal of Nursing Regulation

SN - 2155-8256

IS - 3

ER -